Verification and Validation Methods Sample Clauses

Verification and Validation Methods. ‌ The majority of test and calibration data are reviewed and verified manually from data forms and calibration sheets. Verification of test data that are entered into the ETIS database is a manual review of transcribed data. Personnel responsible for data entry verification/validation are given in AE SOP 4.15.2. ETIS contains features that will alert the user to data that exceed CFR requirements or equipment calibration limits. Data that are determined to be out of limits are verified for correct entry otherwise the data are a test nonconformance. QA for PM sample filters is assisted by FRIS. The software will alert the user to filter conditioning data, checkout time, or reference filter weight changes that exceed CFR requirements. Filter data that are determined to be out of limits are test nonconformances.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Verification and Validation Methods a. Describes process for data verification and validation, providing SOPs and indicating what data validation software should be used, if any D2, pg. 26
Sample 1
Verification and Validation Methods. D.2.1 Documentation, Data Reduction and Reporting Documentation will include the sampling reports, copy of the chain-of-custody, and field QA controls with the analytical results. Data reduction will occur in accordance with the laboratory’s analytical SOPs for each parameter. If difficulties are encountered during sample analyses, a brief description of the problem will be provided. Data derived from sampling events undertaken for projects under the oversight of the BVCP will be reported to the BVCP Project Manager as discussed in Section C.2. Reports to Management.
Sample 1
Verification and Validation Methods. All data records will be checked visually prior to data entry into either the CCAMP database or other electronic formats. Any corrections will be written directly on the datasheet. VMP staff will conduct all reviews and the MBNEP’s QA Officer will review all datasheets and all data entry into CCAMP and other electronic formats. Laboratory QA Officers will perform checks of all of their records. All submittals by laboratories will be reviewed by the MBNEP Program Manager. Any questions with the data submitted by the laboratories will be addressed with the appropriate laboratory personnel who verify the data. Once any issues have been resolved, the data can be loaded into the CCAMP database and other electronic formats. Data validation is conducted by the MBNEP QA Officer and is done by a manual review of the data. The MBNEP QA Officer is responsible for verifying and validating all datasheets, chain of custody forms, maintenance logs and calibration logs. The MBNEP QA Officer also validates the data entry into the CCAMP database and other electronic formats, as well as any calculations. Issues will be noted. Reconciliation and correction will be done by a committee composed of the MBNEP QA Officer and VMP staff with input, if applicable, from laboratory directors and from the RWQCB QA Officer. Any special notes on decisions regarding data usability will be entered in the ‘Notes’ column of the CCAMP database. If it has been determined that the data should not be used in future calculations, it will be flagged as such in the electronic format.
Sample 1
Verification and Validation Methods. Data collected in the field will be validated and verified by the Project QA Officer. Reconciliation and correction will be the responsibility of the Project Director. Laboratory validation and verification of the data generated is the responsibility of each laboratory. Each laboratory supervisor maintains analytical reports in a database format as well as all QA/QC documentation for the laboratory. The Project Director is responsible for oversight of data collection and the initial analysis of the raw data obtained from the field and the contracted laboratory. The Project Director responsibilities also include the generation of rough drafts of quarterly and final reports. The Project Director has final oversight on the submission of quarterly and final reports.
Sample 1
Verification and Validation Methods. D2.1 Data Verification Data verification includes checking that results have been transferred correctly from the original hand-written, hard copy field and analytical laboratory documentation to the project databases. The goal of data verification is to identify and correct data reporting errors. For analytical laboratories that utilize the Xxxxx-specific EDD spreadsheets, data checking of reported analytical results begins with automatic QC checks that have been built into the spreadsheets. In addition to these automated checks, a detailed manual data verification effort will be performed for 10% of all samples and TEM analytical results collected as part of this sampling effort. This data verification process utilizes Site-specific SOPs (see Appendix B) developed to ensure TEM results and field sample information in the project databases is accurate and reliable: ▪ EPA-XXXXX-09 – SOP for TEM Data Review and Data Entry Verification – This Site-specific SOP describes the steps for the verification of TEM analyses, based on a review of the laboratory benchsheets, and verification of the transfer of results from the benchsheets into the project database. ▪ EPA-XXXXX-11 - SOP for FSDS Data Review and Data Entry Verification – This Site-specific SOP describes the steps for the verification of field sample information, based on a review of the FSDS form, and verification of the transfer of results from the FSDS forms into the project database. An FSDS review is performed on all samples selected for TEM or PLM data verification. The data verification review ensure that any data reporting issues are identified and rectified to limit any impact on overall data quality. If issues are identified during the data verification, the frequency of these checks may be increased as appropriate. Data verification will be performed by appropriate technical staff that are familiar with project- specific data reporting, analytical methods, and investigation requirements. The data verifier will prepare a data verification report (template reports are included in the SOPs) to summarize any issues identified and necessary corrections. A copy of this report will be provided to the appropriate project data manager, LC, and the EPA RPM. The data verifier will also transmit the results of the data verification, including any electronic files summarizing identified discrepancies, via email to the EPA Region 8 data manager (Xxxxx.Xxxxxx@xxx.xxx) for resolution. A follow-up email will be...
Sample 1

Related to Verification and Validation Methods

  • Inspection and Verification The Secured Parties and such persons as the Secured Parties may reasonably designate shall have the right to inspect the Collateral, all records related thereto (and to make extracts and copies from such records) and the premises upon which any of the Collateral is located, to discuss the Grantor’s affairs with the officers of the Grantor and its independent accountants and to verify under reasonable procedures the validity, amount, quality, quantity, value, condition and status of, or any other matter relating to, the Collateral, including, in the case of collateral in the possession of any third Person, by contacting any account debtor or third Person possessing such Collateral for the purpose of making such a verification. Out-of-pocket expenses in connection with any inspections by representatives of the Secured Parties shall be (a) the obligations of the Grantor with respect to any inspection after the Secured Parties’ demand payment of the Notes or (b) the obligation of the Secured Parties in any other case.

  • MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project. Project team may use in- house expertise of the project demonstration site or use third party vendor for measurement and verification (M&V) of GHG and energy consumption reduction. The Recipient shall: • Enter into agreement with M&V subcontractor per Task 1.9 • Coordinate site visits with the M&V subcontractor at the demonstration sites • Develop M&V protocol for pre-installation measurement (and calculation): o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that are to be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified. o Ensure installation of sub-metering equipment and data loggers for pre/post data analysis. • Prepare and provide a detailed M&V Plan for each project demonstration site to include but not be limited to: o Description of the monitoring equipment and instrumentation which will be used. o Description of the key input parameters and output metrics which will be measured. o Description of the M&V protocol and analysis methods to be employed. o Description of the independent, third-party M&V services to be employed, if applicable. • Perform three months (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of pre- installation measurements (and calculations) based on the M&V protocol for pre- installation. • Prepare and provide a Pre-Installation M&V Findings Report for each demonstration site that includes M&V protocol, pre-install measurements (and calculations), analysis, and results performed in this task. • Develop M&V protocol for post-installation measurements (and calculations) of: o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that will be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified  Perform 12 months or two seasons, for seasonal facilities, (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of post-installation measurements based on M&V protocol for post-installation. • Provide a summary of post-installation M&V progress in Progress Report(s) (see subtask 1.5) which shall include but not be limited to: o A narrative on operational highlights from the reporting period, including any stoppages in operation and why; and o A summary of M&V findings from the reporting period. • Analyze post-installation electrical, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions. • Prepare and provide a Post-Installation M&V Findings Report for each demonstration site that includes M&V protocol, pre and post install measurements (and calculations), analysis, and results performed in this task. Results should at a minimum report on the reduction of electricity, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel usage and reductions of GHG emissions that directly result from this project and include the following: o Provide all key assumptions used to estimate and determine energy and GHG reductions (and additions, if applicable). o Provide all key assumptions used to estimate projected benefits, including targeted market sector (e.g., population and geographic location), projected market penetration, baseline and projected energy use and cost, operating conditions, and emission reduction calculations. o Discuss whether the energy and GHG emission reductions identified in section II.C were met. • Prepare a CPR Report #2 in accordance with subtask 1.3. • Participate in a CPR Meeting #2.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

  • Validation Mechanism To be eligible for articulation, the student must show evidence of their CompTIA A+ certification and it must have been issued within three (3) years prior to their enrollment in the program.

  • Limitations on Reverse Engineering, Decompilation, and Disassembly You may not reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software, except and only to the extent that such activity is expressly permitted by applicable law notwithstanding this limitation.

  • Certain Calculations and Tests (a) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement or any Loan Document to the contrary, when calculating any applicable ratio or determining other compliance with this Agreement (including the determination of compliance with any provision of this Agreement which requires that no Default or Event of Default has occurred, is continuing or would result therefrom) in connection with a Specified Transaction undertaken in connection with the consummation of a Limited Condition Acquisition, the date of determination of such ratio and determination of whether any Default or Event of Default has occurred, is continuing or would result therefrom or other applicable covenant shall, at the option of the Borrower (the Borrower’s election to exercise such option in connection with any Limited Condition Acquisition, an “LCA Election”), be deemed to be the date the definitive agreements for such Limited Condition Acquisition are entered into (the “LCA Test Date”) and if, after such ratios and other provisions are measured on a Pro Forma Basis after giving effect to such Limited Condition Acquisition and the other Specified Transactions to be entered into in connection therewith (including any incurrence of Indebtedness and the use of proceeds thereof) as if they occurred at the beginning of the four consecutive fiscal quarter period being used to calculate such financial ratio ending prior to the LCA Test Date, the Borrower could have taken such action on the relevant LCA Test Date in compliance with such ratios and provisions, such provisions shall be deemed to have been complied with. For the avoidance of doubt, (x) if any of such ratios are exceeded as a result of fluctuations in such ratio (including due to fluctuations in Consolidated EBITDA of the Borrower) at or prior to the consummation of the relevant Limited Condition Acquisition, such ratios and other provisions will not be deemed to have been exceeded as a result of such fluctuations solely for purposes of determining whether the Limited Condition Acquisition is permitted hereunder and (y) such ratios and other provisions shall not be tested at the time of consummation of such Limited Condition Acquisition or related Specified Transactions. If the Borrower has made an LCA Election for any Limited Condition Acquisition, then in connection with any subsequent calculation of any ratio or basket availability with respect to any other Specified Transaction on or following the relevant LCA Test Date and prior to the earlier of the date on which such Limited Condition Acquisition is consummated or the date that the definitive agreement for such Limited Condition Acquisition is terminated or expires without consummation of such Limited Condition Acquisition, any such ratio or basket shall be calculated on a Pro Forma Basis assuming such Limited Condition Acquisition and other transactions in connection therewith (including any incurrence of Indebtedness and the use of proceeds thereof) have been consummated; provided, that (other than solely with respect to the incurrence test under which such Limited Condition Acquisition is being made) Consolidated EBITDA, Consolidated Total Assets or assets and Consolidated Net Income of any target of such Limited Condition Acquisition can only be used in the determination of the relevant ratio and baskets if and when such Limited Condition Acquisition has closed.

  • SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 4.3.1 The Contractor shall supervise and direct the Work, using his / her best skill and attention. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for coordinating all portions of the Work under the Contract. All aspects of the Project shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the State. Contractor guarantees to repair, replace, re-execute or otherwise correct any defect in workmanship, materials, or the like that fails to conform to the requirements of this Contract or that appears during the progress of the Work or within one year of final acceptance by the State.

  • Testing Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests, and will not be obligated to perform additional procedures on any Review Receivable or to provide any information other than a Review Report. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may provide additional information in a Review Report about any Review Receivable that it determines in good faith to be material to the Asset Representations Review.

  • Inspection and Rejection of Nonconforming Goods (a) Buyer shall inspect the goods within five days of receipt (“Inspection Period”). Xxxxx will be deemed to have accepted the goods unless it notifies Seller in writing of any Nonconforming Goods during the Inspection Period and furnishes documentation reasonably required by Seller. “

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.