The Researcher. The Researcher is a “Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Fellow”. They are appointed as a member of staff at NTNU (see Contract of Employment). The Terms and Conditions of the employment are the same as those of other members of staff at NTNU appointed at a similar level. The duration of the period of the MSCA Fellowship will be: Start date: (Fill in) End date: (Fill in) The Researcher must conduct the MSCA research project according to the XX Xxxxx Agreement for: MSCA Fellowship Project Acronym: (Fill in) MSCA Fellowship Project Title: (Fill in) XX Xxxxx Agreement No: (Fill in) The location of the MSCA Fellowship will be NTNU, Campus XXX, Department XXX. The Researcher will be supervised during their stay at NTNU by (Fill in - Title, Name), hereinafter referred to as the "Supervisor(s)".
The Researcher. The Research Services will be performed by under the supervision and responsibility of Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed from time to time by Yissum (the “Researcher”).
The Researcher. The Research Services will be performed by Xxxx Xxxxx, D.V.S., a doctoral student working under the supervision and responsibility of Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed from time to time by Yissum (the “Res earcher”).
The Researcher. The Services will be performed by or under the sole control and supervision of Dx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed by Yissum, provided that the Company has authorized in advance and in writing the appointment of such qualified person (the “Researcher”).
The Researcher. 3.1 The Research will be performed by, or under the control and supervision of, Pxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (the “Researcher”). In the event that the Researcher, for any reason whatsoever, shall be unable to conduct the Research, or shall cease to be available for the performance of the undertakings set forth in this Agreement, Yissum shall use its best efforts to appoint, within 30 (thirty) days, a successor researcher whose identity shall be approved in advance by the Company (the “Successor Researcher”). Upon the Successor Researcher’s appointment, the Successor Researcher shall be deemed to be a Researcher for all purposes herein. Should the Parties not be able to agree on the identity of a Successor Researcher, notwithstanding their best efforts to do so, the Company shall have the right to terminate the Research and will bear no liability for such termination, provided that (i) no monies paid to Yissum for the Research pursuant to Section 5.1, below, will be refunded by Yissum to the Company, and (ii) the Company shall be responsible for the payment of any accrued fees and expenses due to Yissum based on work duly performed up to the date of termination and those irrevocable commitments entered into by Yissum prior to having received the Company’s written notice of termination.
The Researcher. The researcher is more often than not driven by a desire to see their work being used in some way or other. Whether that is seeing something on the shelves in the local shops or seeing a product being used beneficially by someone, the result is the same and brings a sense of satisfaction. The researcher also wants to be able to do more research. This may sound obvious, but researchers don’t like to be prevented from doing their work by IPR limitations, and they see themselves as free thinkers who come up with great ideas. Of course, money is still a motivation, and a researcher will often believe that their ideas have a high commercial value. This isn’t always true, and it may be that a great idea doesn’t offer a commercial organisation the opportunity to make the all-important profit, but this is not always obvious to the researcher owning the IP. In order to achieve these objectives, the researcher has a number of routes to market that they can take, each with advantages and disadvantages which must be carefully weighed up. On the assumption that the researcher has created a piece of identifiable intellectual property (IP) in the form perhaps of software, algorithm, design or simply unique knowledge, the first decision is whether to make the IP publically accessible or to retain ownership and aim to gain financial benefit from its exploitation. Software can be made available open source, or knowledge can be published in a publically accessible forum. This has the advantage that there is no obligation on the researcher to maintain or develop the research any further – anyone making use of their ideas might be expected to acknowledge its provenance, but would be free to make their own implementation and would take on the costs of development and support. The disadvantage to the researcher would be a loss of control over their ideas, and loss of any financial benefit that might accrue. A half- way house that is available is to release designs or software as “dual license”. This means that, for certain specified applications such as non-profit research, the IP can be used with an acknowledgement and without compromising original ownership. Any commercial exploitation of the IP would be licensed from the researcher. For their part, the researcher must ensure that the IP does not incorporate any “viral” open source elements (which corrupt the IP they are built into) or any commercial components, which may be used under an academic license during the research p...
The Researcher. The Services will be performed by or under the control and supervision of Prof. Avi Domb or such other qualified person as may be determined and appointed from time to time by Yissum (the “Researcher”).
