System Inspections Sample Clauses

System Inspections. Customer will notify Company when the installation of the Customer System is complete by providing Company with a copy of the applicable city/county final inspection permit associated with the installation. Following its receipt of such notice and permit, Company will perform an Acceptance Test on the Customer System to verify the installation and system performance are in compliance with the System Qualifications. If the Company determines the Customer System is not in compliance with the System Qualifications for any reason, Company will notify Customer of such noncompliance. Company will have no further obligation under this Agreement until all such deficiencies are remedied by Customer to Company’s reasonable satisfaction and the Customer System is in compliance with the System Qualifications. Company shall have the right to conduct periodic inspections of the Customer System during the Term upon notice to Customer. Such inspections may include, without limitation, reading the Customer System’s solar production meter as necessary to verify compliance with the System Qualifications. Customer shall provide Company with reasonable access to the Customer System to conduct any such inspection.

System Inspections. The City may inspect the Grantee's cable system during and after construction. The City shall have the right to inspect the cable system, subscriber installations, and the Grantee's equipment used in the maintenance of that cable system at any time to determine compliance with the Franchise Agreement, Enabling Ordinance, and applicable federal, state and local laws. The City shall provide five (5) business days written notice to the Grantee of such inspection, which need not include the specific locations to be inspected. Any testing of the system necessary to accomplish such inspections shall only be performed in the presence of an authorized employee of the Grantee and only after reasonable advance notice to the Grantee. The Grantee shall be notified in writing of any violations found during the course of inspections. If, based on subscriber complaints or its own investigation, the City reasonably believes that the cable system may not be operating in compliance with the requirements of the Franchise or the Enabling Ordinance, it may provide the Grantee written details and require the Grantee to perform tests and to prepare a report to the City on the results of those tests, including a report identifying any problem found and steps taken to correct the problem. Subject to Grantee’s right to dispute such alleged violations, the Grantee must bring violations of this Franchise or applicable law into compliance or must take all reasonable and practicable steps toward compliance within thirty (30) days of the date it receives notice. Notwithstanding the forgoing, in the case of violations which result in public health or safety problems the Grantee shall act as soon as possible to remedy such violations. Inspection does not relieve the Grantee of its obligation to build in compliance with all provisions of the Franchise. This provision is subject to any federal law limitations on the City’s authority.

System Inspections. (a) The Parties will perform a joint inspection of the Relevant Infrastructure and Project Company must produce and deliver to MDOT a report (a “Preliminary System Condition Report”) for review and approval in accordance with the Submittal Requirements not less than 30 months prior to the Scheduled Expiry Date or such shorter period before the Expiry Date as is required by MDOT, that: (i) identifies the condition and each element of the Relevant Infrastructure in relation to the Handback Requirements; (ii) assesses Project Company’s plan related to capital replacement (which, for greater certainty, will include consideration of energy consumption), and Project Company’s proposed strategy and the consistency of Project Company’s proposed strategy with the Project Management Plan; (iii) identifies any works required to ensure all the elements of the Relevant Infrastructure will meet the Handback Requirements on the Expiry Date (the “Handback Works”), and specifying the year in which each of those Handback Works would be required; (iv) specifies an estimate of the costs that would be required to perform the Handback Works (the “Handback Works Costs”); and (v) details how the Handback Works Costs were calculated. (b) The Parties will perform another inspection of the Relevant Infrastructure and Project Company must produce and deliver to MDOT an updated System Condition Report (a “Prefinal System Condition Report”) on the first anniversary of the date of the original Preliminary System Condition Report or such shorter period before the Expiry Date as is required by MDOT for review and approval in accordance with the Submittal Requirements. (c) The Project Management Plan must be amended and updated, as applicable, to include all Handback Works identified in either the Preliminary System Condition Report or the Prefinal System Condition Report (as reviewed and amended in accordance with the Submittal Requirements) not already included in the then current Project Management Plan. (d) Project Company must carry out the Handback Works at its own cost notwithstanding that the actual cost of the Handback Works may be higher than the Handback Works Costs. (e) Either Party may dispute the Preliminary System Condition Report or the Prefinal System Condition Report, including the Handback Works and the Handback Works Costs, in accordance with Schedule 4 - Dispute Resolution Procedure. In the event that a final determination in accordance with Schedule 4 - Dispute Resolu...