Shared Decision Sample Clauses

Shared Decision. Making The District and the Union agree that Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is a process in which the School Leadership Team (SLT) will work collaboratively with the Principal in identifying issues, defining goals relative to the Academic Achievement Plan, developing school budgets and formulating policy and the implementation of such. The uniqueness of each school community requires that the organizational and instructional issues discussed are determined by the SLT. The District and the Union agree that in order to achieve SDM at the school level, the SLT must agree to participate in required SDM training and work cooperatively in order to bring about changes, which may include significant restructuring of instruction.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building- level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions will be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships,1 along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision-making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; 1 The National Labor-Management Partnership includes the American Association of School Administrators (AASA), the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP), the National Education Association (NEA), and the National School Boards Association (NSBA). • School schedules and calendars, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations, policies, and support departments, and adhering to state law and regulations around school calendars; • Resource and staff deployment, being cognizant of and in coordination with district operations and policies; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions), subject to MOUs reflecting such changes to working conditions if applicable; • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students, which may also include release time for educators for professional learning and collaboration, consistent with the requirements of 14 Delaware Code section 1335; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices. As the instructional and operational leader of their school, principals will conduct regular and frequent meetings with their ELT and site-based Community Council to ensure voices and perspectives are heard and represented in their decisions.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Shared Decision making Plan. Each school building shall provide a plan in writing by October 1 to SKEA and the District for making shared or site-based decisions each school year. This plan shall be used for the decisions identified in the collective bargaining agreement as being “shared” or “site-based” and other types of decisions identified in the plan. The plan for shared decision-making shall be developed and agreed upon by a consensus of the certificated staff assigned to the building, except that if true consensus cannot be reached, it shall be approved by a vote of at least 85% of the certificated staff assigned to the building. Buildings which already have a shared decision-making plan are not required to develop a new one each year, but must confirm the consensus on that plan each year prior to October 1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Shared Decision. Making The teaching staff, administration and Board of Education of Shawnee Heights U.S.D. believe that teachers share in decision-making through participatory management with membership on District Quality Council, Site-based Councils, Exit Standards Committee, North Central Steering Committee and sub-committees, Quality Performance Accreditation Committees and other committees required by state mandate or formed out of necessity to address management objectives.
Sample 1Sample 2
Shared Decision. Making: School-based, shared decision-making and building level autonomy are key to meeting student need. Key decisions should be made by school leaders working with the school’s Educator Leader Team, consistent with the key principles of Labor Management Partnerships, along with a site-based Community Council supporting each school. The WLC should explore training and expertise to make sure this shared decision- making is effectively structured. The specific types of school-based decisions and flexibilities that schools will now be enabled to determine at the building level, to ensure that work is done with educators, includes but is not limited to: • School culture and identity; • School schedules and calendars; • Resource and staff deployment; • Certain working conditions (including professional learning topics, professional learning schedules, and interventions); • Well-rounded, equitable, engaging enrichment opportunities for students; and • New hires, staffing priorities, and customized mentoring practices.
Sample 1
Shared Decision. Making In order to xxxxxx shared decision-making in the Scottsdale Unified School District, the Executive Board of SSPA or designees appointed by the Executive Board, will participate in all major decisions affecting District policies and procedures.
Sample 1

Related to Shared Decision

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • The Decision If mediation fails or is not appropriate and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the arbitrator's decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case. With respect to grievances involving customer complaints, the following will apply:

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • COURT'S DECISION 33.01 In the event of any articles or portions of this Agreement being held improper or invalid by any Court of Law or Labour Relations Board, such decision shall not invalidate any other portions of this Agreement than those directly specified by such decision to be invalid, improper or otherwise unenforceable.

  • Independent Credit Decision The Assignee (a) acknowledges that it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement and the Schedules and Exhibits thereto, together with copies of the most recent financial statements of the Borrower, and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit and legal analysis and decision to enter into this Assignment and Acceptance; and (b) agrees that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Assignor, the Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit and legal decisions in taking or not taking action under the Credit Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.