Quality Performance. ▪ Eliminate negative customer/client feedback; ▪ Improve compliance with Company quality assurance policy.
Quality Performance. A. Contractor, shall participate in the development of a written quality improvement plan which shall be approved by MVEMSA.
Quality Performance. If the failure rate of the Portal Measurement Module exceeds specified limits, (e.g. as per Section 3.5) and/or the Philips field failure rate is higher than the expectation (i.e. for Portal Measurement Module less than 4% the first year with a decrease to 1% the second year), Diametrics commits to initiate an SCAR, DAR or CAR driven corrective action project for quality / reliability improvements on Portal Measurement Modules (material, processes, subassemblies) effective per the SCAR or CAR. The goal for the Portal Measurement Module is not to exceed an annual failure rate (AFR) of 4% the first year with a decrease to 1% the second year for the Portal Measurement Module within a one year rolling period starting when the contract becomes effective: AFR = # units failed/ #units shipped by Philips (annualized) Diametrics and Philips will do a monthly failure clearance on a common basis before entering the numbers into the calculation.
Quality Performance. Plexus and Customer agree to discuss the agreed upon quarterly quality metrics for the program.
Quality Performance. The supplier must guarantee the total quality of the goods supplied. We require of our suppliers to commit to strive for a quality rejects level of 0 ppm. Every product must meet our customer and Quadrants specifications. Every delivery with a quality problem on the product, package, and shipment will give rise to demerits and thus will affect supplier’s evaluation. At the start of a new project the first 3 deliveries will have an entrance control. If no major non conformities have occurred, the product will have the level of QA (Quality Assured) product. In case of a major problem the quality status becomes NOT QA product. Quadrant CMS will send a complaint. The supplier needs to send back an 8D report according ISO/TS 16949. (Quadrant CMS can provide a template of an 8D report). All suppliers are evaluated in their own commodity group. The quality performance will be send out by the quality purchasing report F655/1. The table here under gives the levels of evaluation: QA% Mention ≥95% sufficient Write ≥85%- 95% insufficient Action plan ≥75%- 85% Unacceptable Audit <75% after consultation Deleted After consultation management review For suppliers which are below the level of the unacceptability of 75% they will be invited to discuss their action plan and also an audit at the supplier’s premises. If no real improvement occurs after all these actions the customer will be informed for a change over after supplier.
Quality Performance. 3.1 No. Port State Control Detentions
Quality Performance. SUPPLIER shall comply with the quality performance metrics, including but not limited to, the following: Cumulative Yield, Defects per Million Opportunities (DPMO), defect and process paretos and corrective action for agreed upon process control points in the manufacturing process, incoming inspection or outgoing inspection.
Quality Performance. In no event shall a minimum Acceptance Quality Level of 10% (“AQL”) for non-conforming or rejected items be exceeded. WRT’s or WRE’s, as applicable, responsibility for non-conforming items or rightly rejected items shall be to promptly repair or replace such items and to implement reasonable preventative measures at WRT’s or WRE’s expense to insure that the AQL is maintained. In the event a minimum Acceptance Quality Level of 10% (“AQL”) for non-conforming or rejected items is exceeded, MG shall have the right exercisable in its sole discretion to return all of the items described in the purchase order at WRT’s cost. All items shipped under this Agreement may be inspected pursuant to Section 4.8 below.
Quality Performance. Xxxxxx Machine Company LLC requires that all parts and products purchased meet the full requirements as specified by the Purchase Order, the drawings, specifications, and any Quality Notes therein. This includes expected documentation required upon delivery. Suppliers are expected to maintain at least a 98 percent Quality Rating. Percentage is determined by prime received parts divided by the PO quantity.
Quality Performance. Quality performance shall be assessed on a PAA by PAA ------------------- basis using groundwater analysis to gauge restoration progress. To allow the state staffs to evaluate restoration progress in terms of improvements in water quality, URI shall do the following: Collect water quality data at least once every two weeks from each extractor well in the areas currently under active restoration; data shall at a minimum include Conductivity, (or TDS), uranium (as U\\3\\O\\8\\), Ca, pH, and SO\\4\\. At least one time during the term of this Agreement, collect water quality data as described above from all production area baseline xxxxx in areas previously considered restored. In addition, other xxxxx, as selected by the Commission, shall be sampled for Radium-226. Submit water quality sampling data in both tabular and graphic form to facilitate comparison to past restoration progress reports, Submit restoration water quality progress reports monthly. Determination of final restoration shall be done in accordance with standard state procedures, as found in 30 TAC 331.107. Before final restoration is confirmed, URI shall obtain stability samples from all production area baseline xxxxx and analyze for those parameters listed in the restoration table
