REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT Sample Clauses

REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team has reviewed the Strategic Assessment (completed as part of the first stage of the process – Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. Preferred Option Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility. The short list of options have been scored as below: 6e) a New build at Xxxxxxx Street with 879 points, followed by option 6d) a New build at Xxxxx Xxxx with 632 points. There is then a gap to the very similarly scoring options 4b) to Refurbish Xxxxx Xxxx with 435 points; 5c) a New build on adjacent car park site with 431 points and 5d) a New build at Lochgelly North School also with 431 points. Option 1 (The “Status Quo”) was placed last in this analysis with 256 points. Consequently, option 6e) represents a clearly favoured option for all stakeholders, with 6d) a clear 2nd place. There is thereafter very little to choose between the balance of options, none of which score terribly highly. It is important to note however that all options scored considerably higher than Option 1, “Do nothing” in most variations, with only option 5d) ever scoring less and then only when considering “clinical” group scoring in isolation. In summary, it is possible to conclude that all of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process:  Are likely to support Option 6e) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes.  Do not support the “do nothing” option in any way.  See little difference between the relative merits of options 5b), 5d) and 4b). The outturn of this appraisal provides NHS Fife with a clearly preferred strategic direction in support of developing a business case for a new build solution in Lochgelly to deliver the developing service model. This will be further explored in an Outline Business Case along with a financial option appraisal of the options available. In summary NHS Fife intend to:  Conduct a formal financial appraisal relating to the options considered in order to agree an overall preferred option and rationale.  Continue to monitor any material issues that may alter this current position in any way and formally re-visit and review them throughout the business case process as appropriate.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (completed as part of the first stage of the process – Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged.
Sample 1
REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (completed as part of the first stage of the process – Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. PREFERRED OPTION Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility to support delivery of integrated health and social care for the Kincardine community. All of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process: Are likely to support Option 6d) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes. Do not support the ‘do nothing’ option in any way. See little difference between the relative merits of options 6b) and 6c). NHS Fife and Fife Health and Social Care Partnership have summarised the need for change in and around the facilities in Kincardine under a number of defined headings within the IAD. These are: Integrated clinical and care functionality (capacity) issues which have been identified as those problems associated with a lack of local space (area) that is essential for safe, effective, timely and appropriately compliant service delivery, e.g., a lack of clinical support, administrative support, group, sanitary, teaching and specialist areas. Service capacity related issues that predicate the need for change based on a lack of available physical capacity across the service delivery model that are hampering the delivery of integrated care locally. Clinical functionality (configuration) issues that seriously challenge the delivery of safe and effective modern services, e.g., access issues, room design, sound attenuation, security, patient flow, etc. Building and fabric issues including overall condition, suitability, statutory compliance issues and backlog maintenance.
Sample 1
REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT. The Project Team have reviewed the Strategic Assessment (Appendix 1) and the position in terms of the need for change, the benefits that need addressed, the links with National Investment Priorities and the prioritisation scoring, the position remains unchanged. PREFERRED OPTION Overall, the non-financial option appraisal process has identified that the current preferred strategic option is for the service to be delivered from a new build facility. All of the stakeholder groups engaged in this process: Are likely to support Option 6e) as an overall preferred option, unless something radical changes. Do not support the “do nothing” option in any way. See little difference between the relative merits of options 5b), 5d) and 4b). NHS Fife and Fife Health and Social Care Partnership have summarised the need for change in and around the facilities in Lochgelly under a number of defined headings within the IAD. These are: Integrated clinical and care functionality (capacity) issues which have been identified as those problems associated with a lack of local space (area) that is essential for safe, effective, timely and appropriately compliant service delivery, e.g., a lack of clinical support, administrative support, group, sanitary, teaching, group work and specialist areas Service capacity related issues that predicate the need for change based on a lack of available physical capacity across the service delivery model that are hampering the delivery of integrated care locally Clinical functionality (configuration) issues that seriously challenge the delivery of safe and effective modern services, e.g., access issues, room design, sound attenuation, security, patient flow, etc Building and fabric issues including overall condition, suitability, statutory compliance issues and backlog maintenance A ppendix 1 – Strategic Assessment Lochgelly Health Centre Condition Report Current configuration / layout of Lochgelly Health Centre NHS Fife Estates maintain records on the suitability and condition of buildings in its estate. Below is the current information relating to the Lochgelly Health Centre building. Status O Building Engineering Statutory Fire Backlog (C and Below) £121,746 £0 £133,280 £0 Quality C (Not Satisfactory) Space Utilisation O (Overcrowded) Functional Suitability C (Unsatisfactory) Figure used from surveys were complete in December 2012 ccupied GIA (m2) 779 Land Value £70,200 Net Book Value £560,353 Tenure Owned Appendix 2 - Benefits Register Benefi...
Sample 1

Related to REVIEW OF STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Needs Assessment 1. The Contractor shall conduct a cultural and linguistic group-needs assessment of the eligible client population in the Contractor’s service area to assess the language needs of the population and determine what reasonable steps are necessary to ensure meaningful access to services and activities to eligible individuals. [22 CCR 98310, 98314] The group-needs assessment shall take into account the following four (4) factors:

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

  • Geotechnical Engineer « »« » « » « » « » « »

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.