REVIEW COMMITTEE DECISION Sample Clauses

REVIEW COMMITTEE DECISION. Review COMMITTEE File Nos. 1005, 1009, 1028, 1030, 1325 and 1331 Humboldt Division Grievance Nos. X.Xx/X 19-70-2, X.Xx/X 19-70-6, and X.Xx/X 19-70-12 North Bay Division Grievance Nos. X.Xx/X 4-70-7 and X.Xx/X 4-70-9 Sacramento Division Grievance No. X.Xx./C-6-73-4 East Bay Division Grievance No. X.Xx/X 1-73-4 Subject of the Grievances Each of the grievances arose from similar facts. The grievants are employees who are not headquartered at the location where the temporary upgrade occurred. At the headquarters where the temporary vacancy occurred, Clerk C's or D's were upgraded to fill Clerk A or B positions. There were no immediate next-lower classifications in any of the offices concerned in these grievances. The contention, then, of each of the grievants is that he or she should have been temporarily assigned to the location where the vacancy occurred inasmuch as each would have been the successful bidder if the vacancy had been permanent rather than temporary. Discussion The Clerical Labor Agreement specifically deals with the question of filling temporary vacancies in Subsection 18.3(a): "Whenever a vacancy occurs in any job classification, Company may temporarily fill it by assignment. In making temporary assignments to fill job vacancies other than vacancies in beginner's classifications, Company shall first consider regular full-time employees at the headquarters in which the job vacancy exists in the order of their preferential consideration under Section 18.8." (Emphasis added.) Further, in Exhibit A - Lines of Progression - Division Clerical Departments, the following example of a temporary assignment is given: "Temporary upgrades shall take place within the department and headquarters in which the temporary vacancy exists provided there is a next-lower classification to the vacant classification in such department and headquarters. (Emphasis added.) Temporary upgrades into classifications where there is no next-lower classification to the vacancy within the department and headquarters shall be made in accordance with the lines of progression." As the facts point out, in these particular offices there was no immediate next-lower classification to the vacant A or B positions. The question, then, involves the second sentence of the example, and the question specifically is whether this opens the appointment to persons outside of the headquarters. The language of the example is certainly not crystal clear. It could be read to mean that, if there is n...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
REVIEW COMMITTEE DECISION. The decision of the review committee shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in UT Admin. R765-134. A hearing is not required.

Related to REVIEW COMMITTEE DECISION

  • Review Committee A Student may ask that the decision of the Housing Director or designee to deny the cancellation be reviewed. The review will be conducted by a committee consisting of University officials.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Advisory Committees The Board may appoint Advisory Committees to review design review applications, or provide input on other issues of concern to the Board or the Commission. These Advisory Committees include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

  • Committee Determination Any adjustments or other action pursuant to this Section 4 shall be made by the Committee, and the Committee's determination as to what adjustments shall be made or actions taken, and the extent thereof, shall be final and binding.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Committee Work All time spent by employees on Employer established committees and committees mentioned in this contract (including side letters) shall be considered time worked and shall be paid at the appropriate rate of pay. Time spent on committee work will not be counted towards the calculation of overtime.

  • Technical Committee 1. The Technical Committee shall comprise:

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • Study Committee The parties shall utilize the Benefits Advisory Committee, with equal membership by the State and the VSEA, for the purpose of reviewing all issues related to health care and prescription drugs, and recommending changes to the bargaining committees. The parties shall also establish a special study committee to evaluate the current health plans, and make recommendations to the bargaining committees of the State and employees for sustainable savings in the health care plans.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.