Regulatory Relief Requested Sample Clauses

Regulatory Relief Requested. On July 27, l999 a proposed site-specific Federal Rule which set forth the regulatory changes identified below was published in the Federal Register (pages 40696-40715).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Regulatory Relief Requested. A. Testing Agreement -- For Potential License Exceedences During PEMS Development, Validation And Calibration
Sample 1
Regulatory Relief Requested. International Paper seeks regulatory flexibility in two areas: A. Testing Agreement -- For Potential Exceedences During PEMS Development, Validation and Calibration IP requests flexibility to exceed WFI emission limits in order to fully develop, test and calibrate the PEMS technology. These scheduled exceedences are critical so that IP, EPA, ME DEP, the Town of Xxx and stakeholders can confirm the PEMS’ ability to identify license exceedences. If, during model development, the PEMS model is not presented with examples of what constitutes an exceedence, it will have no way of identifying such exceedences if they actually occur during use of the PEMS. A PEMS can interpolate data; it cannot extrapolate. Thus, data points outside the system’s “experience” would be blind spots. The terms that apply to any potential exceedences are set forth in the attached Testing Agreement, the terms of which are incorporated by reference into this FPA. (Attached as Appendix 2). ME DEP has issued a parallel agreement in the form of a Testing Agreement Letter to IP. (Attached as Appendix 3). The Agencies intend for both agreements to provide IP with the same level of flexibility to exceed WFI emission limits for the purposes set forth in the FPA. IP must comply, however, with the more stringent requirements of EPA’s Testing Agreement, unless additional requirements or limitations that are not inconsistent with this agreement are explicitly or implicitly required through implementation of Maine’s Testing Agreement Letter. Thus, IP may permissibly exceed license limits on the WFI only during the time frames and in accordance with the exact terms as set forth in the Testing Agreement and Test Plan (the latter is attached as Appendix 4). IP shall operate the WFI in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements at all other times during the project term. While the Testing Agreement should be consulted for the applicable and exact terms that have been negotiated and agreed to, the most significant of its terms provide that:
Sample 1
Regulatory Relief Requested. Conditional Exemption from the Definition of Hazardous Waste Relating to RCRA Part B Permitting Requirements - On-Site Treatment of Pyrotechnic Wastes.
Sample 1
Regulatory Relief Requested. Conditional Exemption from the Definition of Hazardous Waste Relating to RCRA Part B Permitting Requirements - On-Site Treatment of Pyrotechnic Wastes. Autoliv is proposing that EPA explore the benefits of more streamlined and flexible RCRA regulation of pyrotechnic hazardous wastes from the automobile airbag industry that are treated in industrial furnaces. The project signatories agree that this application can be characterized as a conditional exemption from the definition of hazardous waste. In effect, EPA acknowledges that these particular pyrotechnic wastes do not need to be regulated as hazardous waste, due to its low potential risks and treatment in an industrial furnace rather than an open burning/open detonation (OB/OD) unit. Autoliv will comply with many of the general facility standards of RCRA, and is not seeking relief from all RCRA management protections. Through this project Autoliv intends to be able to treat its waste pyrotechnic materials on-site without obtaining a RCRA Part B permit from the State of Utah that is normally required for thermal destruction. The waste as referenced in Autoliv’s Project Proposal is reactive only and does not contain significant amounts of hazardous constituents (See the Environmental Performance Summary Calculations section of the Autoliv Proposal at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/projectxl/Autoliv/page2.htm. for more detailed information on waste composition). In order to implement this project, EPA will grant a conditional exemption from the definition of hazardous waste, for the specific waste that is subject to this agreement. The effect of EPA granting the conditional exemption is that a RCRA Part B permit will not be required. In summary, the waste pyrotechnics, generated on-site at the Autoliv facility, will be exempted from regulation as hazardous wastes and thus, 40 CFR Part 262 through Part 270 when treated in the MRF in accordance with the provisions in the Site-Specific Rule. The facility will continue to comply with certain general RCRA conditions on facility operations, as described in this agreement, and which will be specified in the Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for the Autoliv Facility and any State of Utah regulations that grant the conditional exemption. The project signatories believe that processing pyrotechnic materials in the MRF can be both cost-effective and achieve superior environmental results as compared to open burning. Project signatories believe that this project meets the intent...
Sample 1
Regulatory Relief Requested. On , l999 a proposed site-specific federal rule which set forth the regulatory changes identified below was published in the Federal Register.
Sample 1
Regulatory Relief Requested. A. Reduced regulatory inspections from NBC of Participating Tier 1 facilities (40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(v))
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Regulatory Relief Requested. Narragansett Bay Commission seeks regulatory flexibility in three areas: A. Reduced regulatory inspections from NBC of Participating Tier I facilities (40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(v)). As part of this project, NBC will reduce its regulatory oversight (i.e. compliance inspections) for the up to ten Tier 1 metal finishing companies. Pursuant to 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(v), NBC must inspect each SIU once per year. Under this project, NBC would reduce this requirement to once every two years for the period of this XL Project. Time and effort saved by NBC regulatory personnel conducting fewer inspections of companies that meet appropriate Project XL criteria will allow for more focused attention on compliance inspections, monitoring and regulating more problematic (Tier 2) companies. NBC believes that additional resources spent on problematic companies will result in improved measurable environmental performance. The reduced sampling requirement can also be considered an incentive for exemplary performance. NBC would continue to perform at least one compliance sampling event per year.
Sample 1

Related to Regulatory Relief Requested

  • Regulatory Reporting Ultimus agrees to provide reports to the federal and applicable state authorities, including the SEC, and to the Funds’ Auditors. Applicable state authorities are those governmental agencies located in states in which the Fund is registered to sell shares.

  • Regulatory Except as described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Final Prospectus: (i) the Company has not received notice from any Governmental Entity (as defined below) alleging or asserting noncompliance with any Applicable Regulations (as defined below) or Authorizations (as defined below); (ii) the Company is and has been in material compliance with federal, state or foreign statutes, laws, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to the Company (collectively, “Applicable Regulations”); (iii) the Company possesses all licenses, certificates, approvals, clearances, consents, authorizations, qualifications, registrations, permits, and supplements or amendments thereto required by any such Applicable Regulations and/or to carry on its businesses as now conducted (“Authorizations”) and such Authorizations are valid and in full force and effect and the Company is not in violation of any term of any such Authorizations; (iv) the Company has not received notice of any claim, action, suit, proceeding, hearing, enforcement, investigation, arbitration or other action from any Governmental Entity or third party alleging that any product, operation or activity is in violation of any Applicable Regulations or Authorizations or has any knowledge that any such Governmental Entity or third party is considering any such claim, litigation, arbitration, action, suit, investigation or proceeding, nor, has there been any material noncompliance with or violation of any Applicable Regulations by the Company that could reasonably be expected to require the issuance of any such communication or result in an investigation, corrective action, or enforcement action by any Governmental Entity; and (v) the Company has not received notice that any Governmental Entity has taken, is taking or intends to take action to limit, suspend, modify or revoke any Authorizations or has any knowledge that any such Governmental Entity has threatened or is considering such action. Neither the Company nor, to the Company’s knowledge, any of its directors, officers, employees or agents has been convicted of any crime under any Applicable Regulations. “Governmental Entity” shall be defined as any arbitrator, court, governmental body, regulatory body, administrative agency or other authority, body or agency (whether foreign or domestic) having jurisdiction over the Company or any of its properties, assets or operations.

  • Authority Relative to this Agreement The Company has the requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and, subject to approval of this Agreement by the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding Shares in accordance with the MBCL, to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby (other than, with respect to the Merger, the approval of this Agreement by the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding Shares in accordance with the MBCL). This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming this Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of Parent and Newco, constitutes the valid and binding agreement of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except that the enforcement hereof may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws now or hereafter in effect relating to creditors' rights generally and (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). The Company has taken, or will take in accordance with Section 6.14, all action necessary to ensure that, so long as this Agreement shall not have been terminated pursuant to Article VIII hereof, no "Rights" (as that term is defined in that certain Rights Agreement dated as of September 23, 1993 (the "Rights Agreement"), between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, a New York corporation) are issued or required to be issued to the stockholders of the Company by virtue of the execution and delivery of this Agreement or the Textron Voting Agreement. The Company and each Company Subsidiary have taken all necessary action to exempt the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Textron Voting Agreement from, or if necessary to challenge the validity or applicability of, any applicable "moratorium," "fair price," "business combination," "control share" or other state anti- takeover Laws (collectively, "Takeover Laws"), including, without limitation, Chapters 110C, 110D, 110E and 110F of the Massachusetts General Laws. Each of the Company and each Company Subsidiary has taken all action so that the entering into of this Agreement and the Textron Voting Agreement and the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and the Textron Voting Agreement do not and will not result in the grant of any rights to any person under the Articles of Organization or Articles or Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws or other governing instruments of the Company or any Company Subsidiary or restrict or impair the ability of Parent or any of its subsidiaries to vote, or otherwise to exercise the rights of a shareholder with respect to, shares of the Company or any Company Subsidiary that may be directly or indirectly acquired or controlled by it or to otherwise engage in transactions with the Company or any Company Subsidiary.

  • Regulatory Authority If any regulatory authority having jurisdiction (or any successor boards or agencies), a court of competent jurisdiction or other Governmental Authority with the appropriate jurisdiction (collectively, the ''Regulatory Body'') issues a rule, regulation, law or order that has the effect of cancelling, changing or superseding any term or provision of this Agreement (the ''Regulatory Requirement''), then this Agreement will be deemed modified to the extent necessary to comply with the Regulatory Requirement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Regulatory Body materially modifies the terms and conditions of this Agreement and such modification(s) materially affect the benefits flowing to one or both of the Parties, as determined by either of the Parties within twenty (20) business days of the receipt of the Agreement as materially modified, the Parties agree to attempt in good faith to negotiate an amendment or amendments to this Agreement or take other appropriate action(s) so as to put each Party in effectively the same position in which the Parties would have been had such modification not been made. In the event that, within sixty (60) days or some other time period mutually agreed upon by the Parties after such modification has been made, the Parties are unable to reach agreement as to what, if any, amendments are necessary and fail to take other appropriate action to put each Party in effectively the same position in which the Parties would have been had such modification not been made, then either Party shall have the right to unilaterally terminate this Agreement forthwith.

  • Appointing Authority If the grievance is not settled under Step 1, it may be formally submitted to the appointing authority. The grievance shall be submitted within seven (7) days after receipt of the written decision from Step 2 or the verbal decision of Step 1, whichever applies. Within seven (7) days after receipt of the written grievance, the appointing authority or designated representative shall meet with the employee. Within seven (7) days thereafter, a written decision shall be delivered to the employee.

  • Regulatory Filing In the event that this Interconnection Construction Service Agreement contains any terms that deviate materially from the form included in Attachment P or from the standard terms and conditions in this Appendix 2, the Transmission Provider shall file the executed Interconnection Construction Service Agreement on behalf of itself and the Interconnected Transmission Owner with FERC as a service schedule under the Tariff. Interconnection Customer may request that any information so provided be subject to the confidentiality provisions of Section 17 of this Appendix

  • Regulatory Good Standing Certification - Explanation - Continued If Vendor responded to the prior attribute that "No", Vendor is not in good standing, Vendor must provide an explanation of that lack of good standing here for TIPS consideration. No response

  • Regulatory Approval 25.1 The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement and any amendment or modification hereto will be filed with the Commission for approval in accordance with Section 252 of the Act and may thereafter be filed with the FCC. The Parties believe in good faith and agree that the services to be provided under this Agreement are in the public interest. Each Party covenants and agrees to fully support approval of this Agreement by the Commission or the FCC under Section 252 of the Act without modification.

  • Regulatory Agreement The Project is, as of the date of origination of the Funding Loan, in compliance with all requirements of the Regulatory Agreement to the extent such requirements are applicable; and the Borrower intends to cause the residential units in the Project to be rented or available for rental on a basis which satisfies the requirements of the Regulatory Agreement, including all applicable requirements of the Act and the Code and the Regulations, and pursuant to leases which comply with all applicable laws.

  • Regulatory References A reference in this Agreement to a section in the HIPAA Rules means the section as in effect or as amended.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.