Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. The NS Mayport Project, as described in this Agreement, meets EPA's Project XL criteria. See 60 Fed. Reg. 27, 282, et seq. (May 23, 1995). The criteria and the basis for stating that they are met are summarized below.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. A. Anticipated Superior Environmental Performance This project will result in superior environmental performance by reducing the risk of childhood lead poisoning by allowing more lead abatements to occur in residential housing units. Specifically, it is anticipated that 12 additional lead abatement projects will be performed by LSB with the current funding available from HUD. This would spare approximately 25 to 30 additional children from lead poisoning. Moreover, on a national level, this Policy Memorandum may ultimately spare thousands of children from lead poisoning.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. A. Environmental Results As set forth in Section II.D. above, this agreement contains a series of enforceable commitments and project goals designed to enhance environmental performance throughout the duration of this project. Again, the core element of this proposal is the performance ratio, which is designed to promote continuous environmental improvement. In addition, Xxxxxxxx has provided a number of other specific commitments also outlined in Section II.D.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. A. Environmental Results The Laboratory XL Project will achieve superior environmental performance, beyond that which is achieved by the current RCRA regulatory system, in three key areas, which are described more fully in the following pages:
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. MSD’s project, as described in this Agreement, meets EPA=s Project XL criteria. See 60 Fed. Reg. 27,282, et seq. (May 23, 1995). The criteria and the basis for stating that they are met are summarized below.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. A. Superior Environmental Performance (SEP) There are two parts to demonstrating whether a project provides SEP. The first part (Tier 1) of the analysis must show that this XL project will provide equivalent public health protection as compliance with the LCR. The second part (Tier 2) of the analysis must show that this project goes beyond providing equivalent public health protection, and in fact will provide superior environmental performance. Based on a qualitative analysis, USEPA believes this project meets the Tier 1 and Tier 2 criteria of public health protection. However, USEPA intends to evaluate the project quantitatively prior to project implementation.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. 2“Coal Remining – Best Management Practices Guidance Manual,” EPA, March 2000. This document is available on the EPA website at: xxx.xxx.xxx/XXX/xxxxx/xxxx/
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. The Atlantic Steel redevelopment, as described in this Agreement, meets EPA's Project XL criteria. See 60 Fed. Reg. 27,282, et seq. (May 23, 1995). The criteria and the bases for stating that they are met are summarized below.
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria. A. Anticipated Superior Environmental Performance
Project Xl Acceptance Criteria
