Ranking Criteria. Within 1st and 2nd priorities as stated above, teachers will be ranked according to the following criteria:
Ranking Criteria. 1. Provide quality off-highway vehicle trail experience that focus on customer service and resource protection. Points 20 Factors: • Directional infrastructure, public information or related projects • Meets an unfulfilled demand or deficiency for off-highway vehicle trail opportunities • Reroute projects for recreational experience, customer service and resource protection issues
Ranking Criteria. Each potential acquisition that meets all of the minimum criteria is scored by adding up points it receives from meeting one or more of the following “ranking criteria.” Points between 0 and the indicated maximum number are awarded for each criterion, depending on the degree to which the acquisition would satisfy each criterion. Factors used by the Working Group members to assign points are listed under each criterion. Each potential acquisition is first evaluated based on resource issues, manageability, and other considerations, and a subtotal score is calculated.
Ranking Criteria. All criteria categories will be ranked in a range of high, medium or low. Projects that receive the highest ranking will be considered first for funding approval. Applicants are responsible for ensuring that applications include full and accurate information so that a fair assessment can be completed. High Ranking – HR (score of 5) Medium Ranking – MR (score of 3) Low Ranking – LR (score of 1) 15.1 APPLICANT 1) Non-allocated community that does not receive a gas tax allocation – HR 2) Regional projects between two or more communities (with at least one being a non-allocated community) – HR 3) Community that receives a gas tax allocation – MR 15.2 PREVIOUS COMMUNITY FUND (CF) FUNDING 1) Has received less than $300,000 (in total) CF funding – HR 2) Has received $300,000 or more (in total) CF funding – LR 15.3 TOTAL GAS TAX FUNDS (Allocated and/or CF) IN THE PROJECT: 1) Under $750,000 – HR 2) Between $750,000 and $1.5 million – MR 3) Over $1.5 million – LR 15.4 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY 1) Projects within an Infrastructure Capital Plan summary for the period of the Gas Tax Extension Program (2010-2014), as per section 12.0 of the CF Guidelines. – HR 2) Projects not addressed in a infrastructure capital plan – LR 15.5 OUTCOMES AND MEASURABLES (as set out in the outcomes indicators schedule of the gas tax agreement. See attached) 1) Project has the most beneficial outcomes and measurables – HR 2) Project has limited positive outcomes and measurables – MR 15.6 PROJECT SUBMISSION 1) Highest priority project submitted in current round.– HR 2) All other submitted applications submitted in current round. - LR 15.7 PROVINCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 1) Project considered a high priority in the provincial infrastructure plan. - HR 2) Project is referenced in the provincial infrastructure plan. - MR 3) Project is not included in the provincial infrastructure plan. - LR 15.8 ELIGIBLE PROJECT CATEGORIES * Please refer to the section 3.0 of the CF Guidelines for a more detailed description of the categories. 1) - Water projects - HR - Wastewater projects, including storm sewer separation projects that provide solutions to address the CWSMMWE – HR 2) - Public transit infrastructure projects - MR - Local roads and bridges projects – MR - Community energy systems projects - MR 3) - Solid waste management – LR - Storm sewer separation projects that do not provide solutions to address the CWSMMWE - LR 15.9 TIMELINESS 1) Project able to start within 6 months – HR 2) Proje...
Ranking Criteria. In order to effectuate the purposes of this chapter, parcels for which REAP applications have been received shall be ranked according to the criteria and the point values assigned thereto as set forth herein. Points shall be rounded to the first decimal (e.g. Under criteria A.1., a property with 740 feet of shared boundary with a park would receive 1 point for sharing a boundary, plus 1.48 points for the length of the shared boundary, which when rounded to the first decimal would be 1.5 points, for a total of 2.5 points for that criteria).
Ranking Criteria. 7.1 Project Category
Ranking Criteria. Each potential acquisition that meets all of the minimum criteria is scored by adding up points it receives from meeting one or more of the following “ranking criteria.” Points between 0 and the indicated maximum number are awarded for each criterion, depending on the degree to which the acquisition would satisfy each criterion. Factors used by the Working Group members to assign points are listed under each criterion. Each potential acquisition is first evaluated based on resource issues, manageability, and other considerations, and a subtotal score is calculated. Additional points are awarded if the property is located within Xxxxx County as a criterion for prioritization under the SNPLMA. The eligibility for funding under the FLTFA (in holding, or adjacent to a federally designated area and containing exceptional resource values) is determined and the date the in holding was established, as defined in the FLTFA, as a criterion for prioritization under the FLTFA.
