Main achievements Sample Clauses

Main achievements. <Content>
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Main achievements. All the JRA2 activities are grouped into three tasks. Task TJRA2.1 has been working on novel architectural paradigms. The two major research studies on multi-stage software router architecture and flow-based virtualisation platform are reported in this deliverable. Task TJRA2.2 has been working on novel concepts for fair sharing, security, accounting and business models. Proper solutions for both the security issues in current and future FEDERICA as well as the business mechanisms optimised for FEDERICA and generalised to any future virtualised infrastructure are given in this deliverable. The fairness issues are also discussed in details. Task TJRA2.3 has been working on the IPsphere-FEDERICA interoperability prototype. The related achievements are reported in separated deliverables but the concept of interconnected or federated virtualisation capable infrastructures motivated all the aforementioned research areas of JRA2.
Sample 1
Main achievements. It is important to remember some figures concerning this regional group. It is a considerable area of 12 millions km2 (four times bigger than the EU) with a population of more than 225 millions inhabitants, with Brazil representing 79% of the population. With regards to GDP, it is estimated as the fourth biggest economy after NAFTA, EU and Japan. It is undoubtedly one of the biggest centres attracting investment thanks to its natural resources21. From a macroeconomic point of view, here are some important indicators. Table 1- Mercosur Economic indicators provided by IMF Indicator Year Brazil Argentina Paraguay Uruguay Growth (%) 2004 4.9 9 4 12.3 2005 3.3 7.5 3 6 2006 (1) 3.5 4.2 3.5 4 Inflation (%) 2004 6.6 4.4 4.3 9.2 2005 6.8 9.5 4.8 5.2 2006 (1) 4.6 10.4 4.7 6.5
Sample 1
Main achievements. ‌ Subtask 6.1.1: • Efficient communication channel implemented between STAGE-STE and SolarPACES ExCo, thus providing updated information to non-European Countries that are not participating in STAGE-STE. • Implementation of a formal Liason between IEC/TC-117 and SolarPACES • Preparation of a comprehensive solar fuels roadmap document for two selected countries (Australia and South Africa). • Initialization of a solar fuels roadmap for China (2015-16). Subtask 6.1.2: • Fluent collaboration with ISES International Headquarters in Freiburg and with ISES Europe. • International dissemination of STAGE-STE at international level and beyond the classical CSP community (collaboration in webinars) • STAGE-STE presence in ISES Solar World Congress (Korea 2015) and Regional Congresses (e.g. Latin-American in Queretaro, Mexico 2014) through organization of specific Forum and technical sessions Subtask 6.1.3: • Implementation of a communication line between CTAER and Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Deputy Director - Knowledge, Policy and Finance Centre of XXXXX, to discuss possible collaboration between XXXXX and STAGE-STE to avoid duplications and maximise synergies. • Identification of many activities carried out by XXXXX of interest to STAGE-STE.
Sample 1
Main achievements. Sets a new energy efficiency target for the EU for 2030 of 32.5%, with an upwards revision clause by 2023; - Will extend the annual energy saving obligation beyond 2020, which will attract private investments and support the emergence of new market actors; - Will deliver real energy savings in the next period 2021-2030 and beyond, coming from new energy efficiency renovations or other measures undertaken in the next decade; - Will strengthen rules on individual metering and billing of thermal energy by giving consumers - especially those in multi-apartment building with collective heating systems – clearer rights to receive more frequent and more useful information on their energy consumption, enabling them to better understand and control their heating bills. - Will require Member States to have in place transparent, publicly available national rules on the allocation of the cost of heating, cooling and hot water consumption in multi-apartment and multi- purpose buildings with collective systems for such services. - Will tackle existing market, behavioural and regulatory barriers in order to increase security of supply, competitiveness of EU industries, reduce energy bills of consumers and health costs for society, thereby also addressing energy poverty and exploiting the positive impacts on economic growth and employment. Next steps Following this political agreement, the text of the Directive will have to be formally approved by the European Parliament and the Council. Once endorsed by both co-legislators in the coming months, the updated Energy Efficiency Directive will be published in the Official Journal of the Union and will enter into force 20 days after publication. Member States will have to transpose the new elements of the Directive into national law 18 months after its entry into force.
Sample 1

Related to Main achievements

  • Targets a) Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will:

  • Performance Measure The specific representation of a process or outcome that is relevant to the assessment of performance; it is quantifiable and can be documented

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.