Patent Validity Any dispute regarding the validity of any Licensed Patent shall be litigated in the courts located in Santa Xxxxx County, California, and the parties agree not to challenge personal jurisdiction in that forum.
Authorization; Validity The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents have been duly and validly authorized by the Board of Directors of Buyer. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Buyer and (assuming the valid execution and delivery of this Agreement by Seller) constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement of Buyer enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.
Governing Law; Validity The interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Illinois without regard to the principle of conflicts of laws. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provisions of this Agreement, which other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
Legal validity Subject to any general principles of law limiting its obligations and referred to in any legal opinion required under this Agreement, each Finance Document to which it is a party is its legally binding, valid and enforceable obligation.
Due Execution, Validity, Enforceability This Loan Agreement and the Pledge Agreement have been duly executed and delivered by the Lender, and each constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the Lender, enforceable in accordance with its terms.
Enforcement of Licensed Patents Each party shall promptly notify the other in writing of any alleged or threatened infringement of any Patent included in the Licensed Patents of which such party becomes aware.
Unlawfulness and invalidity (a) It is or becomes unlawful for an Obligor to perform any of its obligations under the Finance Documents or any Transaction Security created or expressed to be created or evidenced by the Transaction Security Documents ceases to be effective.
Continued Validity A holder of shares of Common Stock issued upon the exercise of this Warrant, in whole or in part (other than a holder who acquires such shares after the same have been publicly sold pursuant to a Registration Statement under the Securities Act or sold pursuant to Rule 144 thereunder), shall continue to be entitled with respect to such shares to all rights to which it would have been entitled as Holder under Sections 9, 10 and 14 of this Warrant. The Company will, at the time of exercise of this Warrant, in whole or in part, upon the request of Holder, acknowledge in writing, in form reasonably satisfactory to Holder, its continuing obligation to afford Holder all such rights; provided, however, that if Holder shall fail to make any such request, such failure shall not affect the continuing obligation of the Company to afford to Holder all such rights.
Grant of License to Use Intellectual Property For the purpose of enabling the Notes Collateral Agent to exercise rights and remedies under this Agreement at such time as the Notes Collateral Agent shall be lawfully entitled to exercise such rights and remedies, each Grantor shall, upon request by the Notes Collateral Agent at any time after and during the continuance of an Event of Default, grant to the Notes Collateral Agent an irrevocable (until the termination of the Indenture) nonexclusive license (exercisable without payment of royalty or other compensation to the Grantors) to use, license or sublicense any of the Collateral now owned or hereafter acquired by such Grantor, and wherever the same may be located, and including in such license reasonable access to all media in which any of the licensed items may be recorded or stored and to all computer software and programs used for the compilation or printout thereof; provided, however, that nothing in this Section 3.03 shall require Grantors to grant any license that is prohibited by any rule of law, statute or regulation or is prohibited by, or constitutes a breach or default under or results in the termination of any contract, license, agreement, instrument or other document evidencing, giving rise to or theretofore granted, to the extent permitted by the Indenture, with respect to such property; provided, further, that such licenses to be granted hereunder with respect to Trademarks shall be subject to the maintenance of quality standards with respect to the goods and services on which such Trademarks are used sufficient to preserve the validity of such Trademarks. The use of such license by the Notes Collateral Agent may be exercised, at the option of the Notes Collateral Agent, during the continuation of an Event of Default; provided that any license, sublicense or other transaction entered into by the Notes Collateral Agent in accordance herewith shall be binding upon the Grantors notwithstanding any subsequent cure of an Event of Default.
Patent Invalidity Claim If a Third Party at any time asserts a claim that any Infinity Patent Right or Purdue Patent Right Covering a Royalty Bearing Product is invalid or otherwise unenforceable (an “Invalidity Claim”), whether as a defense in an infringement action brought by Infinity or Purdue pursuant to Section 7.3, in a declaratory judgment action or in a Third Party Infringement Claim brought against Infinity or Purdue, the Party Controlling such Patent Right (or Infinity with respect to any Joint Patent Right) shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to defend such Invalidity Claim and the other Party shall cooperate with the Party Controlling such Patent Right in preparing and formulating a response to such Invalidity Claim. If Infinity does not defend an Invalidity Claim brought against an Infinity Patent Right in the Territory or Purdue does not defend an Invalidity Claim brought against a Purdue Patent Right in the Territory, the other Party may defend such Invalidity Claim and the coordination provisions of Section 7.3(c) shall apply to such Invalidity Claim, mutatis mutandis as they apply to Licensed IP Infringement suits. Neither Party shall, without the consent of the other Party, settle or compromise any Invalidity Claim in any manner which would (a) have an adverse effect on such other Party’s Patent Rights or such other Party’s rights to Develop, Manufacture or Commercialize a Royalty Bearing Product hereunder or (b) be an admission of liability on behalf of such other Party (provided, however, that the Party initiating such suit may settle such suit without such consent if such settlement involves only the receipt of money from, or the payment of money to, such Third Party and the Party initiating such suit makes all such payments to such Third Party). The Party defending such Invalidity Claim shall bear all expenses with respect thereto and such Party’s counsel shall act as the ministerial liaison with the court, except (i) to the extent such Invalidity Claim is raised as a defense in an infringement action brought by Infinity or Purdue pursuant to Section 7.3, in which case the expense provisions of Section 7.3 shall apply and the counsel to such Party shall act as the ministerial liaison with the court, and (ii) to the extent such Invalidity Claim is raised in a Third Party Infringement Claim brought against Purdue, in which case Purdue shall bear all expenses with respect thereto and shall act as the ministerial liaison with the court.