IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT Sample Clauses

The Identification and Treatment clause outlines the procedures and responsibilities for recognizing and addressing specific issues, conditions, or risks within the scope of an agreement. Typically, this clause details how parties should identify relevant problems—such as defects, non-compliance, or hazards—and the steps required to remedy or mitigate them, which may include notification, assessment, and corrective action. Its core function is to ensure that any issues are promptly detected and effectively managed, thereby minimizing potential harm or disruption and clarifying each party’s obligations in such situations.
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Mitigation of Effects to Above Ground Historic Resources a. Development of a National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Listing for historic one-room schoolhouses in Champaign County, Ohio, including completion of a Multiple Property Documentation Form and one individual nomination of a schoolhouse. b. Development of a Teaching with Historic Places Lesson Plan focusing on the history of the Underground Railroad in Champaign County, Ohio. Once completed, the Multiple Property Listing and Teaching with Historic Places Lesson Plan shall be submitted to the USFWS and SHPO for review and comment and shared with the public according to the methods outlined in the mitigation plan. B. Identification and Mitigation Efforts for Archaeological Resources 1. Previously, Buckeye commissioned a Phase I archaeological survey of the direct APE for 52 proposed turbine locations and associated facilities established during development of the Buckeye Wind Farm (Xxxxxx and Xxxxx, 2011). The survey strategy and methods were based on a work plan developed in consultation with USFWS and SHPO (Church et al. 2010). Four historic-period archaeological sites, five prehistoric sites, and five prehistoric isolated finds were identified during the survey. All sites were either recommended as not eligible for inclusion on the NRHP or, in the case of site 33CH0415 that was recommended as potentially eligible for inclusion, Buckeye proposes to avoid the site through alteration of the Projects’ layout. Additional archaeological work will be performed to identify an alternative route for the direct APE that avoids the site, or if avoidance proves infeasible, a Phase II NRHP evaluation will be conducted on the portion of the site within the direct APE. The USFWS and SHPO have concurred with these recommendations. 2. Prior to the initiation of any construction or mitigation activities that could potentially disturb or damage archaeological resources within the direct APE, Buckeye shall carry out archaeological investigations in accordance with the strategy and methods presented in the work plan approved by USFWS and XXXX (Xxxxxxx xx al., 2012),
View SourceView Similar (3)
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Mitigation of Effects to Above Ground Historic Resources B. Identification and Mitigation Efforts for Archaeological Resources 1. Prior to the initiation of any construction or mitigation activities that could potentially disturb or damage archaeological resources, Xxxxxx Ridge shall carry out archaeological investigations in accordance with the provisions of IC 14-21-1, 312 IAC 21, 312 IAC 22, and the most current Guidebook for Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Inventory- Archaeological Sites and in accordance with the methodology set forth in this PA. USFWS shall ensure that all scopes of work for archaeological identification and evaluation produced by Xxxxxx Ridge include a plan for the treatment of human remains and funerary objects that might be encountered.
View Source
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Identification: In accordance with 36 CFR § 800.4(a) through (c), RUS, USFS, LLBO THPO, SHPO, the Utilities, and other consulting Indian tribes shall consult to identify the appropriate level of effort needed to identify historic properties, including those to which Indian tribes attach religious and cultural significance. The level of effort for the study shall meet the reasonable and good faith regulatory standard [36 CFR 800.6 § 800.4(b)] and be guided by the findings of the reports titled, “Summary Report of a Records Review and
View Source
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Identification: In accordance with 36 CFR § 800.4(a) through (c), RUS, USACE, USFWS, SHPOs, Consulting Tribes, and Dairyland shall consult to identify the appropriate level of effort needed to identify historic properties, including those to which Indian tribes attach religious and cultural significance. The level of effort for the study shall meet the reasonable and good faith regulatory standard [36 CFR 800.6 and 800.4(b)]. 1. In determining the level of effort for identification studies, RUS shall be guided by: a. The ACHP’s guidance on conducting archeology under Section 106 of the NHPA (April 3, 2009). b. Applicable guidance prepared by the USFWS (for refuge lands) and by the SHPOs in the respective states. c. The U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716), September 29, 1983). 2. RUS shall seek agreement with the consulting parties on the scope of any proposed identification study. When RUS determines that the proposed identification study meets the reasonable and good faith regulatory standard, it shall advise Dairyland in writing to implement the approved study. B. Upon completion of field testing/data gathering, and analysis, Dairyland shall submit a draft report describing the findings of the identification study to RUS for review and approval. 1. The draft survey report shall include a map or maps showing the APE and ROW along with the location of identified archeological, traditional or architectural resources. The draft report also shall contain recommendations regarding the potential National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility of identified resources; identify those resources for which additional study might be needed; and make recommendations regarding treatment, including those measures that might avoid adverse effects. 2. If RUS finds the draft acceptable, it shall submit the identification report to the USACE, USFWS, and relevant SHPO and Consulting Tribes for review. The consulting parties shall have thirty (30) days from receipt to provide written comments to RUS on the draft report. RUS shall ensure that written comments submitted in a timely manner are considered by Dairyland in preparation of the final identification report.
View Source

Related to IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT

  • Non-Identification Approved Users agree not to use the requested datasets, either alone or in concert with any other information, to identify or contact individual participants from whom data and/or samples were collected. Approved Users also agree not to generate information (e.g., facial images or comparable representations) that could allow the identities of research participants to be readily ascertained. These provisions do not apply to research investigators operating with specific IRB approval, pursuant to 45 CFR 46, to contact individuals within datasets or to obtain and use identifying information under an 2 The project anniversary date can be found in “My Projects” after logging in to the dbGaP authorized-access portal. IRB-approved research protocol. All investigators including any Approved User conducting “human subjects research” within the scope of 45 CFR 46 must comply with the requirements contained therein.

  • Identification When performing work on District property, Contractor shall be in appropriate work attire (or uniform, if applicable) at all times. If Contractor does not have a specific uniform, then Contractor shall provide identification tags and/or any other mechanism the District in its sole discretion determines is required to easily identify Contractor. Contractor and its employees shall (i) display on their clothes the above-mentioned identifying information and (ii) carry photo identification and present it to any District personnel upon request. If Contractor cannot produce such identification or if the identification is unacceptable to District, District may provide at its sole discretion, District-produced identification tags to Contractor, costs to be borne by Contractor.

  • Identification of Goods Identification of the goods shall not be deemed to have been made until both Buyer and Seller have agreed that the goods in question are to be appropriate to the performance of this Agreement.

  • Identification Cards Identification (“ID”) cards are issued by Us for identification purposes only. Possession of any ID card confers no right to services or benefits under this Contract. To be entitled to such services or benefits, Your Premiums must be paid in full at the time that the services are sought to be received.

  • Partnership Formation and Identification 6 2.1 Formation............................................................................................ 6 2.2 Name, Office and Registered Agent.................................................................... 6 2.3 Partners............................................................................................. 6 2.4