CEQA Findings. On April 26, 2012, by Motion No. 18588, the Commission certified as adequate, accurate and complete the FEIR for the LRDP Project, which includes the Cathedral Hill Project. On May 16, 2012, an appeal of Planning Commission Motion No. 18588 certifying the FEIR was filed with the Board and on March 12, 2013, by Motion No. M13-042, the Board rejected the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR and found the FEIR to be complete, adequate, and objective, and reflecting the independent judgment of the City in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31. On May 23, 2013, by Motion No. 18880, the Commission adopted findings, including a statement of overriding considerations and an MMRP, pursuant to CEQA. In accordance with the actions contemplated herein, the Commission has reviewed the FEIR, including the FEIR Addendum for the revised CPMC LRDP Project, and adopts and incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein the findings, including the statement of overriding considerations, pursuant to CEQA, adopted by the Commission on May 23, 2013, in Motion No. 18880.
CEQA Findings. On April 26, 2012, by Motion No. 18588, the Commission certified as adequate, accurate and complete the FEIR for the LRDP Project, which includes the St. Luke's Campus Hospital and MOB Project. On May 16, 2012, an appeal of Planning Commission Motion No. 18588 certifying the FEIR was filed with the Board and on March 12, 2013, by Motion No. M13- 042, the Board rejected the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Planning Commission to certify the FEIR and found the FEIR to be complete, adequate, and objective, and reflecting the independent judgment of the City in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and Chapter
CEQA Findings. The proposed project may be found categorically exempt under Section 15311 (Accessory Structures) of the State Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15311 allows construction or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premise signs. There are no unusual circumstances creating the reasonable possibility of significant environmental effects. No cumulative impacts will occur as a result of the project. The project will not affect an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern and will not result in damage to scenic resources. The project is not located on a site which is included on any list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, the project may be considered exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Implementation Guidelines.
CEQA Findings. Proposed resolution finding that based on the lead agency Santa Xxxxxxxxx Water District’s (SMWD) December 20, 2013 Final Initial Study (as revised on February 5, 2014), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP), and SMWD’s Resolution No. 2014-02-02 approving and adopting the MND and MMRP, the proposed project presents no new significant or substantially more severe environmental impacts beyond those already considered.
CEQA Findings. 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. and California Code of Regulations, §15000, et seq.) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines (“Existing Facilities”). The project meets all of the requirements of this exemption, as follows:
CEQA Findings. The Review Authority must make the required California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings of fact for each project subject to the Subdivision Map Act.
CEQA Findings. On , by Motion No. , the Planning Commission 19 certified as adequate, accurate and complete the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") 20 for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public 21 Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"). A copy of Planning Commission Motion 22 No. is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. . Also, on , by 23 Motion No. , the Planning Commission adopted findings, including a rejection of 24 alternatives and a statement of overriding considerations (the "CEQA Findings") and a 25 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP"). These Motions are on file with the 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 1 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. . In accordance with the actions 2 contemplated herein, this Board has reviewed the FEIR and related documents, and adopts 3 as its own and incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein the CEQA Findings, 4 including the statement of overriding considerations, and the MMRP.
CEQA Findings. In coordination with City staff, Ascent will prepare CEQA Findings of Fact (Findings) and, if necessary, a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the City’s use. The Findings will specify mitigation measures incorporated into the project and will explain why other measures, if any, have been found to be infeasible. If applicable, the Findings will also identify feasible project alternatives that could reduce adverse environmental effects but are not being implemented, with an explanation as to why they are infeasible. Ascent will prepare an administrative draft of the Findings and will submit (electronically in Word) to the City for review and comment. Once comments are received, Ascent will incorporate comments and deliver an electronic file of the final Findings to the City.
