University Review Committee Sample Clauses

University Review Committee. The powers of the University Review Committee with respect to renewal of probation and tenure shall be:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
University Review Committee. The University Review Committee shall be the same in the case of promotions as it is in the case of tenure.
University Review Committee. The powers of the University Review Committee with respect to promotions shall be:
University Review Committee. The University shall have a review committee to consider tenure and other matters specifically assigned to this committee in the Agreement. The University Review Committee shall be made up of nine tenured or continuing employees plus the Vice-President Academic and Xxxxxxx who shall be chair. The nine employees shall be nominated to this committee by the Nominations Committee of Council and approved by Council with the length of their term specified so as to ensure a reasonable turnover of membership. Employees shall not be nominated for membership if they have served on the University Review Committee in the previous three years or if they have agreed to serve on a College review committee in that academic year. In addition to those members mentioned above, two nominees of the Association shall serve as observers on the University Review Committee with voice, but without vote. The Nominations Committee of Council shall strive to achieve representation from a wide range of disciplinary areas while also respecting the commitment of diversity (Article 7).
University Review Committee. (a) There shall be a University Review Committee which shall review the qualifications and performance of all Faculty Members being considered for renewal, promotion or tenure. The Committee shall consist of the Vice- President, Academic and Research or their designate, who shall be the chairperson and have a vote; one (1) Xxxx from the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Science or the Xxxxx School of Business other than that of the candidate under consideration, to be appointed by the Employer; three (3) Faculty members with one from each of the Faculties of Arts, Science and the Xxxxx School of Business to be elected under the auspices of the Senate each year in April as provided in paragraph (b) hereof. In the case of a candidate being considered for promotion to the rank of Full Professor, at least two members of the University Review Committee shall be Faculty Members holding the rank of Full Professor drawn as necessary from a panel elected under the auspices of Senate. If no vacancy exists on the Committee through the operation of Article 11.1.40(c), these members (i.e., panel members holding the rank of Full Professor) shall replace the regular members elected to the Committee that year with the lesser plurality.
University Review Committee. (a) There shall be a University Review Committee which shall review the qualifications and performance of all Faculty Members being considered for renewal, promotion or tenure. The Committee shall consist of the Academic Vice-President or his/her designate, who shall be the chairperson and have a vote; one (1) Xxxx from the Faculty of Arts, Commerce or Science other than that of the candidate under consideration, to be appointed by the Employer; three (3) Faculty members with one from each of the Faculties of Arts, Commerce and Science to be elected under the auspices of the Senate each year in April as provided in paragraph (b) hereof. In the case of a candidate being considered for promotion to the rank of Professor, at least two members of the University Review Committee shall be Faculty Members holding the rank of Professor drawn as necessary from a panel elected under the auspices of Senate. If no vacancy exists on the Committee through the operation of Article 11.1.40(c), these members (i.e., panel members holding the rank of Full Professor) shall replace the regular members elected to the Committee that year with the lesser plurality.
University Review Committee. (a) There shall be a University Review Committee which shall review the qualifications and performance of all Faculty Members being considered for renewal, promotion or tenure. The Committee shall consist of the Academic Vice-President or his/her designate, who shall be the chairperson and have a vote; one (1) Xxxx from faculties other than that of the candidate under consideration, to be appointed by the Employer; three (3) Faculty members (with no more than two from any one Faculty and no more than one from any one Department), each of whom shall have completed at least three years’ full-time service at the University and two (2) of whom shall be tenured, to be elected under the auspices of the Senate each year in April as provided in paragraph (b) hereof. In the case of a candidate being considered for promotion to the rank of Professor, at least two members of the University Review Committee shall be Faculty Members holding the rank of Professor drawn as necessary from a panel elected under the auspices of Senate. If no vacancy exists on the Committee through the operation of Article 11.1.40(c), these members shall replace the regular members elected to the Committee that year with the lesser plurality.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
University Review Committee. (a) There shall be a University Review Committee which shall review the qualifications and performance of all Faculty Members being considered for renewal, promotion or tenure. The Committee shall consist of the Vice-President, Academic and Research or their designate, who shall be the chairperson and have a vote; one (1) Xxxx from the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Science or the Xxxxx School of Business other than that of the candidate under consideration, to be appointed by the Employer; three (3) Faculty members with one from each of the Faculties of Arts, Science and the Xxxxx School of Business to be elected under the auspices of the Senate each year in April as provided in paragraph (b) hereof. The University Review Committee shall follow article 10.4.4(b) in terms of composition. In the case of a candidate being considered for promotion to the rank of Full Professor, at least two members of the University Review Committee shall be Faculty Members holding the rank of Full Professor. If additional Full Professors are required, they may be drawn as necessary from a panel elected under the auspices of Senate. If no vacancy exists on the Committee through the operation of Article 11.1.40(c), these members (i.e., panel members holding the rank of Full Professor) shall replace the regular members elected to the Committee that year with the lesser plurality.

Related to University Review Committee

  • Review Committee A Student may ask that the decision of the Housing Director or designee to deny the cancellation be reviewed. The review will be conducted by a committee consisting of University officials.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Development Committee As soon as practicable, the Parties will establish a joint development committee, comprised of up to [**] representatives of Verve and up to [**] representatives of Acuitas (the “JDC”). One such representative from each Party will be such Party’s Workplan Leader. Each Party may replace its Workplan Leader and other JDC representatives at any time upon written notice to the other Party, provided, however, that each Party shall use reasonable efforts to ensure continuity on the JDC. With the consent of the other Party (which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), each Party may invite non-voting employees and consultants to attend JDC meetings, subject to their agreement to be bound to the same extent as a permitted subcontractor under Section 3.1(i).

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Technical Committee 1. The Technical Committee shall comprise:

  • Joint Development Committee The Parties shall form a joint development committee (the “Joint Development Committee” or “JDC”), made up of an equal number of representatives of Merck and BioLineRx, which shall have responsibility of coordinating all regulatory and other activities under, and pursuant to, this Agreement. Each Party shall designate a project manager (the “Project Manager”) who shall be responsible for implementing and coordinating activities, and facilitating the exchange of information between the Parties, with respect to the Study. Other JDC members will be agreed by both Parties. The JDC shall meet as soon as practicable after the Effective Date and then no less than twice yearly, and more often as reasonably considered necessary at the request of either Party, to provide an update on the progress of the Study. The JDC may meet in person or by means of teleconference, Internet conference, videoconference or other similar communications equipment. Prior to any such meeting, the BioLineRx Project Manager shall provide an update in writing to the Merck Project Manager, which update shall contain information about the overall progress of the Study, recruitment status, interim analysis (if results available), final analysis and other information relevant to the conduct of the Study. In addition to a Project Manager, each Party shall designate an alliance manager (the “Alliance Manager”), who shall endeavor to ensure clear and responsive communication between the Parties and the effective exchange of information, and shall serve as the primary point of contact for any issues arising under this Agreement. The Alliance Managers shall have the right to attend all JDC meetings and may bring to the attention of the JDC any matters or issues either of them reasonably believes should be discussed, and shall have such other responsibilities as the Parties may mutually agree in writing. In the event that an issue arises and the Alliance Managers cannot or do not, after good faith efforts, reach agreement on such issue, the issue shall be elevated to the Head of Clinical Oncology for Merck and the Vice President of Medical Affairs or Business Development for BioLineRx.

  • JOINT LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18.01 A Joint Labour Management Committee shall be established to attend to those matters which are of mutual interest. To ensure its effectiveness the Committee shall be separate and apart from the grievance procedure.

  • Joint Committee 1. The Contracting Parties shall establish a Joint Committee (hereinafter referred to as “the Committee”) with a view to accomplishing the objectives of this Agreement. The functions of the Committee shall be:

  • Study Committee The parties shall utilize the Benefits Advisory Committee, with equal membership by the State and the VSEA, for the purpose of reviewing all issues related to health care and prescription drugs, and recommending changes to the bargaining committees. The parties shall also establish a special study committee to evaluate the current health plans, and make recommendations to the bargaining committees of the State and employees for sustainable savings in the health care plans.

  • JOINT LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE In order to encourage open communication, promote harmonious labor relations, and resolve matters of mutual concern, the parties agree to create a joint labor- management committee. The committee will be governed by the following principles:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.