Trends Sample Clauses

Trends. 1. Provide the trends seen on your book of business in the past three (3) years, along with your projections of trends for the coming three (3) years: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2. What are the most significant factors driving your trend assumptions for the next (3) three years?

Trends. 16 This is because views and reports for purposes that are based on pseudonymised and identifiable data often produce different numbers to those where the National Data Opt-Out is applied. 17 Additional details regarding the role-based access controls can be found in Schedule T (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/documents/ScheduleUcurrent.pdf ). There are five user access profiles in the TVS Care Record role based access control (RBAC) model for intelligence. These are18:

Trends. Trends is a graphic tool that shows your trends in spending over time. The view can be adjusted to be a three-month, sixth-month, nine-month, or one year view of your spending.

Trends. Describe any trends in the community that may affect the way in which the needs of persons living with HIV/AIDS are being addressed, and provide any other information important to the future provision of services to this population. Sources of Leveraging Report the source(s) of cash or in-kind leveraged federal, state, local or private resources used in the delivery of the HOPWA program and the amount of leveraged dollars. In Column [1], identify the type of leveraging. Some common sources of leveraged funds have been provided as a reference point. You may add Rows as necessary to report all sources of leveraged funds. Include Resident Rent payments paid by clients directly to private landlords. Do NOT include rents paid directly to a HOPWA program as this will be reported in the next section. In Column [2] report the amount of leveraged funds expended during the operating year. Use Column [3] to provide some detail about the type of leveraged contribution (e.g., case management services or clothing donations). In Column [4], check the appropriate box to indicate whether the leveraged contribution was a housing subsidy assistance or another form of support. [1] Source of Leveraging [2] Amount of Leveraged Funds [3] Type of Contribution [4] Housing Subsidy Assistance or Other Support Public Funding ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-Housing Assistance Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-Other Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Housing Choice Voucher Program Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Low Income Housing Tax Credit Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support HOME Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Shelter Plus Care Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Emergency Solutions Grant Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Public: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Public: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Public: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Public: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Public: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Private Funding Grants Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support In-kind Resources Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Private: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Private: Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Other Funding Grantee/Project Sponsor/Subrecipient (Agency) Cash Housing Subsidy Assistance Other Support Resident Rent Payments by Client to Private Landlord TOTAL (Sum of all Rows) Total Amount Program Income and Resident Ren...

Trends. Describe any trends in the community that may affect the way in which the needs of persons living with HIV/AIDS are being addressed, and provide any other information important to the future provision of services to this population. Sources of Leveraging TOTAL (Sum of all Rows) Total Amount Program Income and Resident Rent Payment Collected During the Operating Year 1. Program income (e.g. repayments) 2. Resident Rent Payments made directly to HOPWA Program 3. Total Program Income and Resident Rent Payments (Sum of Rows 1 and 2) Program Income and Resident Rent Payments Expended To Assist HOPWA Households 1. Program Income and Resident Rent Payment Expended on Housing Subsidy Assistance costs 2. Program Income and Resident Rent Payment Expended on Supportive Services and other non-direct housing costs 3. Total Program Income Expended (Sum of Rows 1 and 2) a. Total Short-term mortgage, rent and/or utility (STRMU) assistance b. Of the total STRMU reported on Row a, total who received assistance with mortgage costs ONLY.

Trends. There was a 21% decrease in the number of women and children staying in an emergency shelter during 2001 compared to 2000—a return to the 1998 level. For all groups, except African Americans, there was a drop in the number of women and children served in shelters. For African Americans, there was an increase in number from 44 in 2000 to 59 in 2001. Domestic Violence Solutions’ three 30 to 45–day emergency shelters are often filled to capacity. Researchers estimate that only 3% of battered women in the general population become residents at battered women's shelters. This would then indicate that, in Santa ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, upwards of 18,000 women per year experience partner abuse and either do not contact the shelter program near them or choose options other than entering the shelters. A continued focus on increasing public outreach and education will allow more people to access available services. Knowledge of available resources such as emergency shelters would likely increase the need for more or larger shelters than currently exist in Santa ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County.

Trends. The number of CalWORKs families decreased from 5,323 in December 1997 (just prior to the implementation of welfare reform) to 3,733 as of the end of December 2001. This represents a 29.9% decrease in the number of families receiving public assistance even as the county’s population has been increasing. The proportion of residents receiving CalWORKs cash assistance in the North and South portions of the county has been generally stable during the past five years with a slight increase in the proportion of cases from the North County recently (78% North and 22% South at the end of June 2002).

Trends. The purpose of this section is to provide a commentary on the context and possible explanations of trends in legislation and the implementation of the legislation within your country. Please structure your answers around the following questions. T.2.1 Please comment on any changes in penalties and definitions of core offences (offences of use, possession for personal use, supply (including production) of illicit drugs) in the legal framework since 2000. If possible discuss the possible reasons for change (e.g. political philosophy, changes in the drug situation, public debate, policy evaluation). T.2.2 Please comment on how the implementation of the law has changed since 2000. If possible discuss the possible reasons for change (e.g. new guidelines, availability of alternatives to punishment)

Trends. The purpose of this section is to provide a commentary on the context and possible explanations of trends in prevention within your country. Please structure your answers around the following questions. T.2.1 Please comment on the main changes in prevention interventions in the last 10 years and if possible discuss the possible reasons for change. For example, changes in demography, in patterns of drug use, in policy and methodology, in target groups or in types of interventions.