Structure of the Report. I. Introduction/ background. A summary, setting out key project aspects for the reader, must be included in this section.
Structure of the Report. The main part of the report focuses on the detailed analyses of the university-business cooperation from the perspective of employers (chapters 2-6). Firstly, the report provides analyses of the most frequent means of cooperation with higher educational institutions, following by identification of drivers and motives which lead to this cooperation as well as the barriers of this cooperation the companies are facing with. The report also provides the quantitative analyses of the outcomes and impact of the university-business cooperation and companies’ perceptions on universities and cooperation with them as well as qualitative analyses of the companies’ own experiences of university- business cooperation. Regarding the issues of the employability the report provides an insight into the acquired competences of the graduates from employers’ perspective and the recruitment mechanisms they use to hire new employees. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of university-business cooperation from the perspective of the employers in the first place provide policy implications. Chapter 7 includes analyses on university-business cooperation among employers on the EU level. Besides EMCOSU countries the analyses also include responses of employers from several other countries and regions that were involved in the large scale survey. Among the countries the survey was focused to Croatia, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Italy with additional regions comprising several countries: continental, ex-YU countries, Scandinavia and Russia. Chapter 8 comprises additional analyses among employers’ associations in EMCOSU countries and on EU level (few countries outside of the project consortium) from which the majority of them are xxxxxxxx of commerce and industry. Chapter 9 includes analyses of survey responses among experts of specific economic sectors. It focuses on three major sectors, namely industry, services and ICT. The employers’ associations representatives provided responses on their institutional cooperation with universities, but specific sector experts provided their views on the university-business cooperation of companies from their sector of expertise. All analyses provide results that can bring a great contribution to university-business cooperation in EMCOSU countries, but also on a broader EU level. The conclusions and policy implications are available in Chapter 10.
Structure of the Report. The aim of this report is to provide guidance on the management of HSE aspects for the design and applications of floating modules. The concise guidance is presented in Chapter 2. The guidance is based on information as detailed in the following chapters (see Figure 1 for a graphical presentation of the report structure). These chapters comprise: a hazard inventory elaborated in a risk register, with an evaluation of risks in accompanying texts (Chapter 3); food safety issues in relation to multi-use of islands including aquaculture (Chapter 0); ecosystem-module interactions, i.e. the impact of the floating modules on the ecosystem, and the impact of the ecosystem on food production and the (integrity of) floating structures (Chapter 5).
Structure of the Report. To address the objectives, this review has three sections. The first describes surveillance systems; the second describes and evaluates data sources used by those systems and the third describes methods of signal detection. These three elements will be introduced in this section.
Structure of the Report. The report is structured as follows: - Section 2: EIP intervention logic – presents the intervention logic of the EIP covering the main elements of the EIP, setting out the relationship between policy objectives, measures and anticipated outputs and outcomes. - Section 3: Analysis - this section provides an analysis of the existing set of indicators used to monitor the performance of the EIP, as established through desk research and the interviews. It examines all the main (large scale) “projects” and a selected number of smaller scale “projects”, assesses the rationale and the process through which they were established , identifies the main strengths and weaknesses and points to the issues and considerations related to their selection and monitoring.
Structure of the Report. This report is presented using the Business Case Framework developed by Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx from Work Package 1. The business case investigates future projections and tries to balance between vision and xxxxx- cial feasibility of implementing innovative concepts such as Space@Sea.
Structure of the Report. The work in WP7 is divided in three major tasks, dedicated to each separate case study, with a similar structure and organization:
Structure of the Report. The report is organised as follows. The methodology section describes the models adopted in the present study for prediction of the transient outflow from a shale gas well following a blowout, thermal radiation from the resulting jet fire and the explosion overpressure in the event of a delayed ignition of the released gas. Next the results obtained using the linked outflow, fire and explosion models based on their application to a hypothetical scenario involving the accidental blowout of a shale gas production well are presented and discussed. The pertinent data required for the modelling are taken from an existing well in the UK for which the relevant design, operational and prevailing ambient data are available. The simulation model predictions are presented in the form of 2D plots of thermal radiation and explosion over-pressure contours as a function of distance and time following well blowout. This data in turn forms the basis for determining the minimum safety distances taking into account defined thresholds for deferent severity harm scenarios. Conclusions section summarises the main findings and provides a discussion of the practical usefulness of the results in the context of risk assessment of shale xxxxx.
Structure of the Report. 39) This report commenced by offering a summary of the EU’s works on the regulatory environment for the shale gas industry (s 1.1), and is further divided into following parts (i) ‘Background’ (s 2), (ii), ‘Legislative Level’ (s 3), (iii) ‘Plans and Programmes: SEA’ (s 4), (iv) ‘Project Level: EIA’ (s 5), and (v) ‘Public Participation in other EU Legislation’ (s 6).
Structure of the Report. 1.8 The structure of the EIA Report is as follows: Section 2 – Project Background and Description Section 3 – Air Quality Section 4 – Noise Section 5 – Water Quality Section 6 – Waste Management Section 7 – Ecology Section 8 – Cultural Heritage Section 9 – Landscape and Visual Section 10 – Implementation Schedule of Recommended Mitigation Measures Section 11 – Conclusions
