Institutional Cooperation Sample Clauses
The Institutional Cooperation clause establishes a framework for collaboration and coordination between the parties' respective institutions. It typically outlines the responsibilities of each institution, such as sharing information, resources, or expertise, and may set up joint committees or regular meetings to facilitate ongoing cooperation. This clause ensures that both parties work together effectively to achieve shared objectives, minimizing misunderstandings and promoting efficient project execution.
Institutional Cooperation. A. During the period of this agreement, both institutions agree to:
i. arrange articulation meetings to consider appropriate major course equivalencies between NeSCC and ETSU. As needed, academic affairs officials at each institution will arrange annual articulation meetings with the appropriate faculty, ▇▇▇▇, or chair of the respective academic program to discuss topics including, but not limited to, curricular changes, student success initiatives, and other transfer topics.
Institutional Cooperation. (a) With due regard to their respective competences, institutional settings and operational frameworks, the Parties shall inform and consult with each other, as appropriate, on issues of mutual interest, including legal, regulatory and development issues, on which cooperation may ▇▇▇▇▇▇ the purposes of the Parties.
(b) Where issues of mutual interest are identified and the Parties consider that they may profit from cooperation and resulting synergies, the Parties shall define an appropriate structure for the planning, execution and monitoring of their cooperation, as well as for the dissemination of results.
(c) The Parties will exchange their publications concerning issues of common interest and related fields.
(d) Appropriate arrangements may be made from time to time for reciprocal representation of CERLALC and WIPO at meetings convened under their respective auspices, which consider matters in which the other Party has an interest.
(e) The Parties shall meet, face to face or by remote means, at least annually to take stock of progress and identify possible new areas of cooperation.
(f) Each Party shall appoint a Representative who shall coordinate relations with the other Party, including between technical experts of the Parties, and who shall keep the Head of his or her Organization informed. Any change of Representative shall be communicated in writing to the other Party.
Institutional Cooperation. The secretariats:
a) will investigate and actively pursue cross-representation between the organs of their respective instruments, notably: Conferences/Meetings of the Parties; regional meetings; the CMS Scientific Council, AEWA Technical Committee and the Ramsar Scientific and Technical Review Panel. They will ensure that the need for, and scope of cooperation between Ramsar, CMS and AEWA is clearly reflected in their respective Strategic Plans.
b) will keep under review how far the mechanisms and methodologies already developed are complementary, and advise their respective Conferences/ Meetings of the Parties on the adoption of joint standards, criteria and methodologies. They will ensure that work on future guidelines (e.g., those proposed by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ on environmental impact assessment, or the AEWA Conservation Guidelines) is coordinated, and that, if possible, any new guidelines that are applicable to all three instruments are adopted by their respective decision-making bodies. To further assist with institutional cooperation and linkages at all levels, the following will be undertaken: – will exchange their annual work plans, and the annual Joint Work Programmes between them will form an integral part of these. – will advise one another, well in advance, of planned or proposed regional or sub-regional meetings with the intention of seeking opportunities for joint-hosting of such meetings (see below under Joint Conservation Action). – exchange advice on their national Administrative Authorities and Focal Points, members of Standing Committees1, and scientific bodies and take measures to encourage working partnership between these personnel/agencies etc to promote integrated approaches to implementation of Ramsar, CMS and AEWA. – exchange advice on project initiatives they are undertaking on a regular basis, including the AEWA International Implementation Priorities 2000-2004, the CMS Information Management and Strategic Plans, the MedWet Initiative, the Evian Project and the proposed Participatory Management Advisory Service of Ramsar. – will provide materials/stories/information for inclusion in their respective newsletters/bulletins and websites. – will assist one another, as appropriate, with the identification of suitable permanent staff and interns by sharing advice on highly rated candidates. - The secretariats will facilitate the application of existing arrangements that allow for the scientific/technical bodies of each instrument to have officia...
Institutional Cooperation. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and CMU agree to cooperate in the mutual recognition of their award programs and other academic cooperation as identified by the relevant academic staff from both institutions. This agreement is for the following pathway: ⮚ At CMU Master of Public Health or Master of International Public Health (Year 1) ⮚ At Griffith The articulation and credit transfer arrangements for entry to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Programs are detailed in the Articulation Schedule attached to this agreement. Additional programs may be added and amendments made to these programs through the appropriate authority at each institution. Full details of the articulation and credit transfer arrangements between the institutions are available from the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University Credit Precedent Database online ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.au/apply/credit-transfer/overseas-institutions. This website contains the most up-to-date information on these articulation arrangements and takes precedence over the content of the attached Articulation Schedule in the case of a discrepancy. Students must achieve a minimum GPA equivalent to 4.0 (on a 7.0-point scale) to be eligible for entry to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ programs. Each student will be enrolled at Griffith, subject to the relevant program entry requirements. The selection and admission of students into ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Programs is the responsibility of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Applications will be subject to meeting the necessary pre-requisites, including English language entry requirements. At the time of signing this agreement, the English language entry requirement for CMU students articulating to an approved undergraduate program at Griffith is a minimum overall band score 6.0 IELTS (Academic) with no sub- score less than 5.5, or equivalent. CMU students who do not meet the English language entry requirements may apply to enrol in the Direct Entry Program (DEP) conducted by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ English Language Institute (GELI). Upon successful completion of DEP, students will have met the English language proficiency requirement to enter their program of study directly, without needing to sit an external proficiency test. Further details of the GELI standard entry requirements can be found at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.au/international/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-english-language-institute. Students coming into Griffith on a pathway from CMU are required to complete the three-day (12 hour) Succeeding at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Program. It is a compulsory, free intensive short course for students from international partner universities...
Institutional Cooperation. 1. The Parties shall support direct cooperation between cultural institutions, associations of creators and other relevant organizations active in the field of culture from both states.
2. In order to facilitate the planning of dissemination of their artistic achievements, the Parties shall exchange information on cultural infrastructure of each Party.
Institutional Cooperation. UMSL and STLCC will develop and support activities that encourage interaction among their AFA/ BFA faculties and students.
Institutional Cooperation. 1. The Centre's cooperation with other bodies shall be guided by the principles of coordination, complementarity and added value in respect of any private sector development initiatives taken by public or private entities. The Centre shall exercise selectivity in undertaking its tasks.
2. The Centre may be called on by countries or regions to help prepare and execute national or regional indicative programmes concerning the private sector.
3. The Centre may be called on to execute, manage or co-manage special programmes undertaken by the Commission of the European Communities (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") for ACP countries.
Institutional Cooperation a) Each Secretariat will invite the other to be represented regularly in meetings of the Conference of the Parties of the other Convention, and other meetings covering matters of mutual interest.
b) Each Secretariat will identify the possibilities for the subsidiary bodies of its Convention to participate as observers at meetings of the other Convention.
c) The Secretariats will inform the respective focal points for each Contracting Party of their cooperative activities. In cases where the Contracting Parties have different focal points for the Conventions, the Secretariats will seek to promote consultation and cooperation between them.
Institutional Cooperation. 3.1 The Participants to this Letter of Intent are committed to working together in establishing the Renewable and Energy Efficiency Guarantee Window (RE and EE Window) projected to unlock commercial financing for renewable energy generation and energy efficiency investments in a portfolio, up to 25 million euros.
3.2 The Participants to this Letter of Intent hereby intend to use the financial instruments that may be offered by the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) which may include the counter-guarantee mechanisms to provide partial credit risk protection to the RE Window portfolio for both KCGF and its partner banks.
3.3 The Participants intend to take all relevant decisions jointly, after prior consultations.
Institutional Cooperation. With the aim of conducting the practical cooperation provided for in this memorandum of understanding, the Parties may propose, through the diplomatic channel or through the Joint Commission mentioned in section 5, the creation of ad hoc working groups to discuss and study possibilities for cooperation in the areas mentioned in section 2. To that end, the Parties shall encourage or promote cooperation between the public and/or private agencies of both nations, in accordance with their respective national laws and regulations.