Stakeholder Interviews Clause Samples
Stakeholder Interviews. Face-to-face interviews with selected stakeholders such as key City personnel, community leaders, School District, and user group stakeholders, etc., to provide the opportunity to gain valuable perspective. These interviews seek insight into the City’s values, strengths, weaknesses, unique attributes, distinctive competencies, and initiatives as well as identify any private sector and/or non-profit organizations and their capabilities to compete or collaborate with the City in delivery of recreation and swimming programs and services. This process lays the groundwork for an engaging and active Public Involvement Process. Consultants will work with Staff to identify and schedule interviewees, with a maximum of eight (8) interviews to be scheduled over the course of one day.
Stakeholder Interviews. Our team will conduct key stakeholder interviews and small group meetings to incorporate this input into the planning process. The interviews and meetings can be conducted with representatives from Earlham Community Schools, economic development groups, major landowners and developers, business owners, and other civic and neighborhood organizations. Members of our team will contact, via email, the community stakeholders and community groups as identified by the Advisory Committee and schedule individual and small group meetings to be held virtually via video conference calls. (Estimated 1-day of virtual meetings)
Stakeholder Interviews. ENGINEER conduct up to four (4) focus group meetings or small group stakeholder interviews.
D3.4.1 Stakeholder interview transcripts and stakeholder feedback report
Stakeholder Interviews. ▇▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇ will conduct individual interviews with key stakeholders in the study area to better understand the context of the area and specific expectations. The interviews will be brief (approximately one hour), informal, and designed to elicit issues and concerns from the stakeholders as well as provide an opportunity to inform stakeholders about the project. ▇▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇ will conduct up to sixteen (16) one‐on‐one interviews with elected officials, partner public agencies, community leaders, property owners, development community representatives, neighborhood organizations, and other key stakeholders. These interviews will allow ▇▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇ to discuss current initiatives and available information; project expectations; and identify key issues that need to be addressed. • Community Workshop #1 – ▇▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇ will develop advertising materials and facilitate an evening public workshop which will introduce the project to the broader Downtown Cheyenne community. The intent of the workshop is to give the public the opportunity to be engaged early in the process, while giving the Kimley‐Horn team and MPO the ability to understand public issues, concerns, and objectives while learning the community’s key expectations for the corridor. • Community Workshop #1 announcement and advertising material for City publication and distribution, including: o Twelve (12), reusable public meeting announcement boards • A memorandum summarizing up to sixteen (16) stakeholder interviews • A memorandum summarizing PSC meeting #1 and Community Workshop #1 • PowerPoint presentation for the PSC meeting #1 and Community Workshop #1
Stakeholder Interviews. Understanding views, opinions, and concerns related to expanded interstates and tolling will help INDOT develop effective, messaging and communications tools. The most effective way to gain this insight is one-on-one interviews conducted via phone. The average interview will last 30 minutes and will follow an approved interview questionnaire. • The interviews will investigate INDOT topics of interest related to tolling as well as areas that will help us understand potential threats and barriers to a statewide tolling program. Interviewers will also ask interviewees about the benefits of improved and expanded interstates on their communities, businesses and industries. • Stakeholders and thought leaders representing key audiences (e.g., business owners, environmental justice leaders, rural residents, urban commuters, etc.) are likely candidates to be interviewed. A total of 50 interviews will be conducted and a high-level summary will be produced of commonly held beliefs, initial reactions and persuasive arguments that will help INDOT achieve its goals and objectives.
Stakeholder Interviews. One-on-one and/or small group interviews shall be completed by the Contractor early in the project before the first facilitated meeting of the Policy Advisory Group. Up to 20 stakeholder interview meetings shall be conducted by the Contractor, which shall be comprised of interviews with: members of the Policy Advisory Group, Project Working Group and the Citizen Advisory Committee, the Mayor, and up to four other key stakeholders. Additional stakeholders may include members of the Chamber of Commerce or other business oriented groups, members of the MTA’s Citizens’ Advisory Council or their organizations, and others designated by the Policy Advisory Group and Project Working Group. The Contractor’s objective for these interviews will be to conduct a confidential conversation, to the extent allowed by law, on a wide range of topics, including: • In what areas is MTA currently successful? What are the most important areas for improvement? • Are there markets, which MTA does not serve well now that should be served? What are the growth markets in terms of geography, trip purpose, population market segment, and time of day? • What can MTA and the City in general do to facilitate regional travel using transit? • What are the things riders want most from MTA and how best to provide them? • What are the things drivers and other employees want most from MTA and how best to provide them? • Given the trade-offs inherent in service planning (e.g., speed versus stop spacing, transit priority versus moving traffic, frequent service on fewer routes versus shorter walk access), which should be MTA’s top priorities? • Are there infrastructure and fleet issues (vehicle types, passenger facility needs) that should be considered in the planning process? • Are there examples of other properties that “get it right” that could serve as models for MTA in any key areas? Are there peer systems to which to compare MTA? • What are the barriers preventing MTA from achieving its vision, and how can these barriers be mitigated? • If a sustainable financial operation is a key goal, what are the most promising avenues for increasing revenue and/or reducing costs? • Are there new funding measures that would have broad support in the City? • Do MTA’s existing service design policies provide the necessary guidance to redevelop the system? The Contractor’s objective for these interviews shall be a broad, freewheeling conversation that will be kept confidential during the process, to the exte...
Stakeholder Interviews. Interviews with key stakeholders identified in 2.1 above will be conducted to establish contacts and understand the various points of view that will influence the progress of the project. The interviews will help identify key issues to be addressed by the project and the formulation of an effective public involvement strategy. Where necessary, follow-up interviews will be conducted to expand on key issues and lines of communication will be established to ensure that critical information can be accurately communicated.
Stakeholder Interviews. COMPANY will conduct individual interviews with high influence stakeholders during the Feasibility Study. The high influence stakeholders will likely include the following (one (1) meeting assumed, unless otherwise noted):
▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Property Management – two (2) meetings;
ii. KCFPD (specifically, Fabyan Forest Preserve) – two (2) meetings;
iii. The Holmstad Property Management and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Health Center;
iv. Holmstad residents;
v. City of Batavia; and
vi. City of Geneva.
Stakeholder Interviews. GENERAL STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
Stakeholder Interviews. Consultant will conduct 6 interviews with people such as: service providers for people experiencing homelessness, members of the Hispanic/Latino community, service providers, policy makers, and residents of the City confronting housing affordability issues. The focus of the interviews is on people with unmet housing needs within the City, especially communities who are typically underrepresented in public discussions. (Task 3)
