Development Process. The Parties desire to process the Project as a priority project as expeditiously as is reasonably feasible. To streamline the Agency’s review process and to facilitate the timely implementation of the Project, the Parties agree that the Project Site shall no longer be divided into Sub Phases and Developer shall not be required to apply for and obtain Approval of Sub-Phase Applications which is redundant to the Major Phase Application process. Section 1.4 of the DDA is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
Development Process. (1) Subject to the terms of the DDA, Developer shall develop the Project Site in a series of Major Phases and, within each Major Phase, in a series of Sub-Phases. The DDA includes a process for Developer’s submittal of Major Phase Applications and Sub-Phase Applications, and for the Agency’s review and grant of Major Phase Approvals and Sub-Phase Approvals. The anticipated order of development of Major Phases, and Sub-Phases in each Major Phase, including the Completion of Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Lots and Agency Lots, is set forth in the Schedule of Performance.
(2) As set forth in Section 2.3, and subject to satisfaction of the requirements of this Below-Market Rate Housing Plan, Developer shall preliminarily identify the number of anticipated Below-Market Rate Units for each anticipated Residential Project in a Major Phase Application, and may revise such number in a Sub-Phase Application. The final number of Below-Market Rate Units for each Residential Project shall be specified in the applicable Assignment and Assumption Agreement.
(3) Subject to the terms of the DDA: (i) upon receipt of a Sub-Phase Approval, Developer shall construct Infrastructure within such Sub-Phase in accordance with the Schedule of Performance; (ii) when it enters into Assignment and Assumption Agreements and Transfers Market Rate Lots and Stand-Alone Workforce Lots to Vertical Developers (including Developer and Affiliates of Developer) for the construction of Residential Projects, Developer shall do so consistent with this Below-Market Rate Housing Plan; and (iii) Developer shall Complete the Infrastructure for the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Lots and the Agency Lots in accordance with the Schedule of Performance.
(4) As set forth in the DDA, twenty-five percent (25%) of the Market Rate Lots and Stand-Alone Workforce Lots in each Major Phase shall be offered for sale to Vertical Developers by an auction or other process Approved by Developer and the Agency.
(5) Subject to the terms of the DDA, upon receipt of a Vertical Approval a Vertical Developer may construct, as applicable, Residential Project(s) that must include the number of Below-Market Rate Units for such Residential Project(s) as are set forth in the applicable Vertical Approval.
Development Process. (a) The Trustee must hold, manage, invest and exploit the Development Land as follows:
(i) in consultation with the Investment Committee (if there is one);
(ii) by exercising the Trustee’s investment powers in accordance with clause 19, Schedule 5 and the Investment Policy or Default Investment Policy (as the case requires); and
(iii) by ensuring that Property Development Activities are undertaken by one or more Noongar Boodja Development Corporations.
(b) The Trustee is not permitted to Distribute the Development Land pursuant to clause 17 or otherwise.
Development Process. The development process for the Project is as set forth in the Scope of Work and Schedule of Advances, and any material changes to the Scope of Work and Schedule of Advances must be agreed to by both Parties. In the event either Party desires changes to the Scope of Work and Schedule of Advances due to practical concerns related to the Project, including unforeseen circumstances or events, the Parties shall promptly meet and confer to consider alternatives and determine, if possible, a change to the Scope of Work and Schedule of Advances. For
Development Process. The planning stage of the comprehensive cancer plan was initiated with a leadership institute sponsored by the CDC and the American Cancer Society (ACS). Representatives from the Maryland State Council on Cancer Control, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and ACS attended the leadership institute and met several times to discuss initial planning xxxxxx- xxxx. A Core Planning Team (CPT) was formed in April 2001 and included representatives from the Maryland DHMH, ACS, University of Maryland, Xxxxx Xxxxxxx University, and local health departments. The CPT developed a grant application for funding from CDC to develop a comprehensive cancer plan. In October 2001, DHMH was awarded a cooperative agreement from CDC, on behalf of the CPT, to develop a com- prehensive cancer plan. The membership of the CPT was then expanded to include representation from other nonprofit, health care, and community organizations from around the state. The overarching goal was to have broad repre- sentation within a small practical group that could reach consensus and make efficient decisions. The pur- pose of the CPT was to provide oversight and guidance to the development of an updated Maryland Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan. Among its many activities, the CPT developed the overall framework in which the plan would be devel- oped, drafted the outline of chapters to be included in the plan, determined the committees that would be formed, and assisted with recruiting membership for each committee. The CPT has continued to meet on an ongoing basis to provide direction to the development of the plan.
Development Process. In our development at Puissant Technologies, we do follow the popular methodologies in the industry – called the agile process or the agile development. In this process of development we try to be as much as interactive with the client as possible during the development cycle. This is beneficial for both the parties in view of the client’s satisfaction and the developer’s economical use of his time, money and energy.
Development Process. 1.4.1. The Protocol has been developed by all the Parties, building on previous bilateral and service specific agreements in Orkney. The Protocol adheres to the national model authorised by the Scottish Government Health Department. This ISP follows the same structure as the eCare model, though contains more detail. The intention has been to develop an over-arching statement of law and policy for all information-sharing applications. This will be supplemented by guidance procedures for specific applications which will adopt the common core procedures as their base line. The guidance procedures will set out the specific arrangements and responsibilities designated, any additional requirements, and the service level agreements for each application. This Protocol is expected to cut down the development time for guidance procedures.
1.4.2. This Protocol contains overarching principles for information-sharing between the Parties. All earlier agreements made on data sharing between the Parties, including the protocol between Orkney Islands Council Social Work Service and NHS Orkney, shall be reviewed to bring them into line with the principles agreed in this Protocol, where necessary. This Protocol does not apply to the Council’s and Northern Constabulary’s duties in relation to Sex Offenders, which are subject to a separate protocol.
Development Process. A process dedicated to reviewing new technologies and implementing development projects in order to provide a more robust software package with additional features and applications.
Development Process. All contractors, consultants, employees and other persons who contributed to the development, creation or conception of the GhostStep® Technology have entered into intellectual property assignment contracts with and in favour of the Seller whereby each such person has assigned or confirmed the Seller's ownership of all right, title and interest (except moral rights) that such person may possess in and to such any Intellectual Property developed, created or conceived by such person in connection with the GhostStep® Technology in favor of Seller, to the full extent permitted by applicable laws. Each such contractor, consultant, employee or other person has irrevocably waived in writing its moral rights, where applicable, to any developments created by it on behalf of the Seller in connection with the GhostStep® Technology; wherein said person was an employee, consultant or contractor, where appropriate, the consultant or contractor also obtained the necessary waiver(s) of moral rights from any and all of its own employees, consultants, and contractors involved in the creation of any such Intellectual Property, to the full extent permitted by applicable laws.
Development Process. All contractors, consultants, employees and other persons who contributed to the development, creation or conception of the Low Energy Cartridge (LEC) Technology have entered into intellectual property assignment contracts with and in favour of the Seller whereby each such person has assigned or confirmed the Seller's ownership of all right, title and interest (except moral rights) that such person may possess in and to such any Intellectual Property developed, created or conceived by such person in connection with the Low Energy Cartridge (LEC) Technology in favor of Seller, to the full extent permitted by applicable laws. Each such contractor, consultant, employee or other person has irrevocably waived in writing its moral rights, where applicable, to any developments created by it on behalf of the Seller in connection with the Low Energy Cartridge (LEC) Technology; wherein said person was an employee, consultant or contractor, where appropriate, the consultant or contractor also obtained the necessary waiver(s) of moral rights from any and all of its own employees, consultants, and contractors involved in the creation of any such Intellectual Property, to the full extent permitted by applicable laws.
