Our Team Clause Samples

The "Our Team" clause defines the individuals or roles within the service provider's organization who will be responsible for delivering the contracted services. It typically lists key personnel, their qualifications, or their specific responsibilities, and may outline procedures for substituting team members if necessary. This clause ensures that the client knows who will be working on their project, providing transparency and helping to maintain consistent service quality throughout the engagement.
Our Team. 4.1 We will use reasonable efforts to ensure that our Representatives named in the Letter are available to provide the Services. However, if we need to, we may replace or reassign any Representative at any time on reasonable notice to you. 4.2 Each of us agrees that, during the term of this Agreement and for a period of six months after it ends, we will not directly or indirectly solicit for employment a Representative of the other. However, both of us may advertise or recruit generally in the media.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Our Team. 4.1 Each of us agrees that, during the term of this Agreement and for a `period of twelve months after it ends, neither of us will directly or indirectly employ or contract any Representative of the other who is involved with the Services and Deliverables. A fee of $40,000 will be payable to the other party in the event that this term is breached.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Our Team. Competitive gymnastics is fun work at North Shore Gymnastics. We feel that gymnastics should be fun, yet constructive, thereby making practice enjoyable for everyone involved. Let’s face it, practice is 2-3 hours long, at least three time a week year round. The children and coaches spend a lot of time together, so if the work at hand is fun, is it work? The team is expected to train for the entire practice session including conditioning. We promote friendly competition in the gym. As with our staff, demeaning or condescending behavior from our gymnasts will not be tolerated and will be corrected immediately. We train as a team, compete as a team and have fun as a team.
View Source
Our Team. Given the multi-dimensional nature of the COVID-19 crisis and the nature of the tasks included in the Request for Cost Proposal, we have outlined an approach that combines ongoing access to McKinsey’s leadership team, subject matter experts, and as-needed surges of research and analytic support throughout the entire period of performance – plus a four-week surge of a dedicated team. This team structure will allow the work to ramp-up as requested, surge with focused support to drive quick progress on the most time-intensive deliverables, and then provide ongoing counsel, analysis, and refinement over the longer period. Our leadership team throughout the period of performance will include ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Senior Partner), ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (Senior Partner), ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Partner), ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇ (Partner), ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (Partner), ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Senior Expert), ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Associate Partner), ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Engagement Manager), and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Engagement Manager). We will draw in additional expertise from leading McKinsey experts in public health and healthcare, fiscal/tax assessment, economic development, and crisis and disaster response, and bring in analytic support from our research and insights team as needed. As part of our global and US efforts supporting institutions on the COVID-19 crisis, we have stood up a central COVID-19 Response team for the US public sector in addition to a Global Public ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇- ▇▇ Response team. These central teams ensure best practices and learnings gathered in supporting COVID-19 responses efforts globally can help inform New Jersey’s response. We also have dedicated COVID-19 response teams by sector (e.g., banking, real estate, pharmaceuticals, retail, logistics) who can give NJEDA and the State unparalleled insight into the concerns, likely responses, and industry dynamics as the crisis evolves. Our four-week surge of support will include a full-time Engagement Manager plus three dedicated Associates and/or Analysts. See Appendix A for additional details on our team and proposed staff.
View Source
Our Team. At etc there is a strong desire to establish a sense of community with everyone involved throughout all stages of a project. We keep channels of communication open — projects seem to move along more rapidly when everyone involved knows what to expect. Canyon Mountain Heights Subdivision– Canyon City, OR Little Canyon Mountain Height Subdivision – Canyon City, OR ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Fork Estates Subdivision – Long Creek, OR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Butte Subdivision – Prineville, OR Rivers Edge Subdivision – Spray, OR Cracker Creek Subdivision – Sumpter, OR Indian Rock Subdivision Phase I & II – Prineville, OR Stone Ridge Subdivision – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ID ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Minor Partion Improvements – John Day, OR Lundy Minor Partion Improvements – Canyon City, OR ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Partion Improvements – Canyon City, OR ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Minor Partion Improvements – John Day, OR ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Partion Land Development – Condon, OR Canyon East Farmworkers Housing – Madras, OR Strawberry Apartment Site Rehab – Prairie City, OR Valley View Addition – ▇▇▇▇ Day, OR Step Foreward Homes Site Design/Planning – John Day, OR Crest Butte Apartments Site Design – Bend, OR Castle Rock Apartments – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, OR Grant County Ag Facility at Fairgrounds – John Day, OR JD Rents Site Design – John Day, OR Sunriver Plaza Parking, Access, and Drainage Rebuild – Sunriver, OR Bank of Eastern Oregon Parking Lot Rebuild – John Day, OR 1188 Brew Pub Frontage Improvements – John Day, OR Valley View Addition – John Day, OR ▇▇▇▇▇ City USFS Work Center Site Improvements – ▇▇▇▇▇ City, OR Vale Senor Center Site Improvements – Vale, OR Unity USFS Site Improvements – Unity, OR Columbia River Health Clinic – Boardman, OR ▇▇▇▇▇ City Armory Parking Lot Improvements – ▇▇▇▇▇ City, OR ▇▇▇▇▇ Butte Emergency Communications Tower – Grant County, OR Grant County Road Department Storage Shed – ▇▇▇▇ Day, OR Head Start Facility – Umatilla, OR Warm Springs Fire Management Facility – Warm Springs, OR Community Presbyterian Church Site Improvements – Redmond, OR ▇▇▇▇ Day Fire Hall – John Day, OR
View Source
Our Team. As part of this project we would draw expertise from across the organisation, a profile of senior staff who would be involved in this programme is provided below. These will be supplemented by development, analytical and production staff as required. Dr ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (Chief Executive Officer) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ has a degree in Pharmacy from Queen’s University, Belfast and an MSc in Pharmaceutical Sciences from the University of Sunderland. He has over 20 years of product development experience (R&D and commercial) covering a wide range of dosage forms and delivery systems. He previously worked for Sterling Winthrop, Sanofi, Chiroscience, Celltech and UCB. During the course of his career he has been involved in the development and commercialisation of a number of successful drug products, drug delivery technologies and patent filings. Immediately prior to joining Encap Drug Delivery he was Director of Product Technology Development for UCB Celltech. Dr ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (R&D Director) ▇▇▇▇ has over 11 years experience in the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Industry and immediately prior to joining Encap Drug Delivery was Director of Pharmaceutics at Aptuit (formerly Quintiles). She has a BSc (Hons) in Applied Biochemistry and a PhD from the University of Paisley, Scotland. ▇▇▇▇ joined Quintiles in 2001 as a Senior Formulation Scientist and rapidly progressed through supervisory and Management roles at the company. ▇▇▇▇ has an outstanding track record in drug product development, with particular emphasis on oral dosage forms. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Chief Scientific Officer) After a period within academic research, Massoud joined the pharmaceutical industry and became involved in product development, holding senior positions in a variety of areas including clinical trials manufacture (Phase I and II) and Quality Assurance. He joined Encap in 1997 and was appointed as Chief Scientific Officer in 2005. Massoud has over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry and is author/co-author of over 20 scientific papers and over 10 patents. Massoud gained his BSc in Chemistry from Tehran University and holds an MSc in Chemistry from Salford University. ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (Head of Process Development) Vic has a BSc (Hons) in Chemistry from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Watt University, an MSc in Kinetics and a PhD in N-nitroso compounds, also from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Watt University. Vic started his career as an analytical chemist in the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain’s Medicines Testing Laboratory in Edinb...
View Source
Our Team. The core team of recruitment professionals assigned to this project possess relevant experience, including many years of public service, consulting expertise and executive-search experience. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will serve as project director, providing strategic direction to the project manager, setting context, and providing useful insights to the County. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ will serve as the project manager and lead recruiter, using both his recruiting and subject-matter expertise in human resources to help clarify the County’s priorities and uncover and evaluate candidates. The proposed team also includes ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, whose past work with the County will assist in understanding the context for the search, and our recruitment support team who will conduct thorough research into prospects, support production of the recruitment brochure and ad postings, and ensure timely response to candidates. In addition, we will use the knowledge and networks of our team of special advisors to extend the reach and screening capabilities of this search. The qualifications of our team members are summarized below. ▇▇▇▇▇ is an experienced local government professional with over 25 years of experience leading organizational development, strategic and work force planning, executive recruitment, performance management, teambuilding, and facilitation engagements for public sector agencies. Early in her career, ▇▇▇▇▇ worked a professional executive recruitment firm, where she led candidate research efforts. Since then, she worked for the County of San Mateo and then in 2006 joined Management Partners. She is active in professional associations, including as past president of the Municipal Management Association of Northern California, founder of the Women’s Leadership Summit, and serves as the chair of the Cal-ICMA Talent Initiative. She is certified in a variety of professional assessment instruments, including the ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇ Type Indicator, DiSC, and CPI260 coaching assessment and leads our executive search practice. She has conducted executive recruitments for large and small public sector agencies across the west. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ has more than 20 years of collective experience in human resources and organizational development at various levels and across various disciplines including, state and municipal government, community and educational institutions. His areas of expertise include human development, process improvement, workforce planning, executive recruiting, stra...
View Source
Our Team. The provided profiles showcase a diverse group of accomplished in Program, Product AI with unique expertise and contributions to the field of artificial intelligence. Collectively, they bring a wealth of experience in generative AI, machine learning, and large language models (LLMs), with a strong emphasis on innovation, strategic alignment, and impactful solutions across industries. Together, these professionals represent a spectrum of AI expertise, from strategic leadership to technical engineering, all committed to advancing AI innovation and delivering high-value solutions that benefit industries and society alike.
View Source
Our Team. Our Laboratory Team consists of experienced scientists, molecular technologists, data analysts and public health professionals and is led by ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, M.D., an experienced molecular diagnostic pathologist and NIH-funded investigator.
View Source

Related to Our Team

  • Project Team County’s Designated Representative for purposes of this Agreement is as follows: County shall have the right, from time to time, to change the County’s Designated Representative by giving A/E written notice thereof. With respect to any action, decision, or determination which is to be taken or made by County under this Agreement, the County’s Designated Representative may take such action or make such decision or determination or shall notify A/E in writing of an individual responsible for, and capable of, taking such action, decision, or determination, and shall forward any communications and documentation to such individual for response or action. Actions, decisions or determinations by County’s Designated Representative on behalf of County shall be done in his or her reasonable business judgment unless express standards or parameters therefor are included in this Agreement, in which case, actions taken by County’s Designated Representative shall be in accordance with such express standards or parameters. Any consent, approval, decision, or determination hereunder by County’s Designated Representative shall be binding on County; provided, however, County’s Designated Representative shall not have any right to modify, amend, or terminate this Agreement or executed Supplemental Agreement. County’s Designated Representative shall not have any authority to execute a Supplemental Agreement unless otherwise granted such authority by the Williamson County Commissioners Court. A/E shall have the right, from time to time, to change A/E’s Designated Representative by giving County written notice thereof. With respect to any action, decision, or determination which is to be taken or made by A/E under this Agreement, A/E’s Designated Representative may take such action or make such decision or determination, or shall notify County in writing of an individual responsible for and capable of taking such action, decision, or determination and shall forward any communications and documentation to such individual for response or action. Actions, decisions, or determinations by A/E’s Designated Representative on behalf of A/E shall be done in his or her reasonable business judgment unless express standards or parameters therefor are included in this Agreement, in which case, actions taken by A/E’s Designated Representative shall be in accordance with such express standards or parameters. Any consent, approval, decision, or determination hereunder by A/E’s Designated Representative shall be binding on A/E. A/E’s Designated Representative shall have the right to modify, amend, and execute Supplemental Agreements on behalf of A/E.

  • Steering Committee The Steering Committee is responsible for evaluating Project Proposals submitted by Participants, selecting the projects to be undertaken by the Program, and determining whether the projects are appropriate for development as an American National Standard. The Steering Committee is thus charged with implementing the strategic direction given to the Program by the Director and the Participants by selecting projects consistent with those strategic goals. The Steering Committee shall make its determinations using the guidelines set forth in these Governing Documents and as otherwise may be promulgated by the Director. The Steering Committee shall also provide recommendations to the Director regarding the relative priority of different Project Proposals and provide counsel and advice to the Director on such other issues as the Director may request. The Steering Committee shall assume such further responsibilities as the Director may from time to time direct. The Steering Committee shall use reasonable efforts to perform its responsibilities under the Governing Documents, to encourage compliance with the Governing Documents by all Participants, and to promote proper use of the Program’s intellectual property rights, in accordance with, and subject to, the needs of the Program in the context of its overall mission. The Steering Committee may establish one or more subcommittees to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. Except as provided in the Operating Procedures, a majority of the Steering Committee voting at a meeting is required to take or approve any action. A majority of the Steering Committee shall constitute a quorum for voting purposes. The Steering Committee consists of individuals appointed by the Director and the Director. There are no formal prerequisites to serve on the Steering Committee, although an effort will be made by the Director to include individuals on the Steering Committee who have technical and other expertise relevant to the Steering Committee’s responsibilities. To ensure fair representation of the varied groups that comprise the Program, seats on the Steering Committee will be divided in the following manner: Non-Profit Organizations 3 seats For-Profit Industry Partners 3 seats AAMC 1 seat Government 1 seat Health Professions Education and Training Programs 4 seats Director 1 seat If a seat cannot be appointed to an individual representing a government agency Participating Organization, that seat may be appointed to a non-profit organization or health professions education and training program. Steering Committee members may be nominated by the existing Steering Committee subject to maintaining the required allocation among the Participation Types. Final appointment is determined by the Director. Steering Committee members shall serve for a one-year term and may be re-appointed for up to three consecutive terms or until a successor from the Participation Type is identified. Steering Committee membership may resume after a minimum one-year hiatus from the last appointment. Appointment to the Steering Committee may not exceed 18 years total for the lifetime of the individual. A Steering Committee member may be removed by a two-thirds vote of the Steering Committee or by a two-thirds vote of all Participants within the Participation Type represented by the Steering Committee member. A substitute Steering Committee member may be appointed by majority vote of the Steering Committee who shall continue to serve until the next regularly scheduled appointment of that Steering Committee position. The Director appoints a Chair to preside over Steering Committee activities. The individual appointed to serve as Chair serves one year as Chair Elect, one year as Chair, and one year as Immediate Past Chair, but only to the extent such person remains on the Steering Committee. The responsibilities of the Chairs will be as follows: i. Chair Elect – Oversight of the Voting Body and its procedures ii. Chair – Oversight of Steering Committee Activities iii. Immediate Past Chair – Oversight of annual meeting Planning Committee and other community engagement activities. The Director appoints the Chair, which is reviewed by the Steering Committee and approved by the Voting Body. The Steering Committee, at its option, may appoint a Secretary and such other roles as the Steering Committee deems necessary to carry out the purposes of the Program. Those that hold these roles may be removed and successors appointed by majority vote of the Steering Committee.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.