Right to be forgotten. This right may apply where the sharing is based on Consent, Contract or Legitimate Interests, or where a Court Order has demanded that the information for an individual must no longer be processed. Should either circumstance occur, the receiving Partner must notify all Data Controllers party to this protocol, providing sufficient information for the individual to be identified, and explaining the basis for the application, to enable all Partners to take the appropriate action. ☐ GDPR Article 18 –
Right to be forgotten. You may ask us to remove the personal data we hold about you in certain circumstances; this removal may be effected by deletion or use of another technology that allows us to mask the information we have about you or your membership history such that it can no longer be used to personally identify you. It may not be possible for us to remove all of the information we hold about you where we have an ongoing membership relationship with you, or you have a pending or confirmed transaction with Interval or we otherwise have a legal basis to retain the information. However, please contact us to discuss how we can assist with your request. Other rights Where we process your data on the basis that you have consented to such processing, you have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by emailing xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or by contacting the Interval office which services your country of residence. A full list of Interval servicing offices can be found at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/web/cs?a=60&p=offices. In addition to the above, you may also ask us to stop or restrict processing of the personal data we have about you. You may also ask us to transfer your personal data to a third party in certain circumstances. If you would like any further information about these rights or how to exercise them, please contact us.
Right to be forgotten. The ‘right to be forgotten’ remains a challenging area of ethics on the internet, and the ongoing selling of personal data, data leaks and rapid changes in Terms and Conditions for online products is legally contested and frequently debated in both courts of law and software development companies. Drawing on considerations about both the difference in media between a printed thesis and an online, seemingly more ephemeral blog, I do not include texts that the bloggers have removed from their blogs. However, the ephemerality of blogs and online materials can be illusory, as many deleted blogs remain accessible through the Internet Archive or the Wayback machine. Nevertheless, I do not quote directly from them or from blogs that have been set to ‘Private’ in the course of my research in the final version of my thesis. When I do allude to them in the main text of the thesis, I have anonymised these sources. Thus, regardless of the ‘Retrieved’ dates in blog references, all blog posts bar one (which I clarify), were online in the public domain as of 30 August, 2016, although I have of course returned to check them before submission. Though this has slowed my progress, I considered it to be an ethically important position: if something is no longer in the public domain, it does not fall under the constraints I placed on my research. While I recognise that the completion of this thesis would mean that these quotations and discussions would be available, through my research, in a more static form, it nonetheless as closely as possible reflects the realities of writing about online phenomena. For the bloggers who give both their first and last names, I have included their first names and the names of their blogs. This makes it easy to find them, should their blogs still be online, but also means that they will not remain easily searchable based on their full names long after this thesis is completed. It also helps stylistically, as a writing device to reflect the informality of these networks.
Right to be forgotten. The Right to be Forgotten is also supported for the mobile app users who can request it and have certain data deleted so that third persons can no longer trace them as if they never participated in the Platform. Figure 45 and 46 illustrates the Right to be Forgotten functionality from the mobile application point-of-view. This option is nested inside the options area of the application.
Right to be forgotten. The right to require us to delete your personal information in certain situations
Right to be forgotten. The entity or organisation that controls the personal data collected from the users, needs to provide the ability to the user to delete any collected personal data, to cease any dissemination of the data and potentially have third parties halt processing of the data. • Data portability. User can ask from XxxxxXxxx to receive the personal data concerning them and have the right to transmit that data to another company. • Privacy by design. BehavAuth should collect and store only personal data that are necessary for the completion of the authentication process (data minimization), and refuse personal data access to people that are not immediately connected to the authentication process.
Right to be forgotten. You may reach out directly to the Pathways for Veterans Organization to request the removal of your personally identifiable contact information such as name, email, phone number, or address. The Organization’s contact information should be made available on their website, in a privacy policy on their website, or a contact page.
Right to be forgotten. If you wish to completely delete all your personal data that we hold, you should send a request to e-mail xxxx@xxx.xx. But we can do it only if the Agreement is terminated with you. - Right to refuse from receiving the information You can inform us about the reluctance of further receiving any marketing information from us by sending a request to the e-mail address xxxx@xxx.xx. If the Agreement is not terminated with you, we will still continue to send you the reports and necessary information in order to fulfill our obligations under the Agreement.
Right to be forgotten. You may request that Xxxxx erase your Personal Information when Dakim no longer needs such data.
Right to be forgotten. As discussed in Section 2.4.1, recent legislation regarding privacy are being enforced in Europe and soon from other parts of the world. In Europe, GDPR and UK's new Data Protection Bill include, among other aspects, the right to be forgotten. The right to be forgotten or the right to erasure gives individuals the power to request the removal of their personal data when there is no compelling justification for its continued processing by an organization. For example, Article 17 of the EU regulation1 outlines the circumstances under which citizens can exercise the right to be forgotten: ● It should be granted if the data is no longer necessary to serve the purposes for which it was originally processed; ● if the subject withdraws consent or has a rightful objection to the processing and there are no overriding legitimate grounds for it to continue; ● if it has been unlawfully processed; ● if it needs to be erased for compliance with a legal obligation; ● if it was collected in relation to the offer of certain information society services; ● in the case of personal data of children, if they may not have fully understood the risks at the time they gave consent. Personal data made public by a data controller also need to be erased. The data controller must provide ways to inform anyone else processing the data that the erasure has been requested. The exceptions are when the data is necessary for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information, for use in legal claims, for complying with legal obligations, is in the public interest, or for some archiving that is part of scientific or historical research or statistical purposes. Failing to meet these obligations may incur in a fine of €20 million or up to four per cent of worldwide revenue, whichever one is higher. The complete implementation of the right to be forgotten requires cooperation of different layers and WPs in the project. In Section 4.2.1, we describe how Lemonade platform could be used as a traceability tool in order to help identifying data sets and models that could contain data for users aiming to exert their rights.
