Resident Evaluation Sample Clauses

Resident Evaluation. The resulting discipline may include, but is not limited to: repeat rotation(s) or other directed educational experiences; letter(s) of counseling; failure to renew Resident’s contract; termination from FMRP; or other appropriate action.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Resident Evaluation. 4.3.1. Each residency program must demonstrate that it has an effective plan for assessing resident performance throughout the program and for utilizing the results to improve resident performance. This plan should include:
Sample 1Sample 2
Resident Evaluation. Xxxx agrees that at the end of the Resident(s) training experience or rotation, the site coordinator shall complete in a timely fashion any evaluation forms requested by School concerning Resident’s participation in the Program POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: The Resident(s) will abide by the policies and procedures of Xxxx concerning working/training conditions for the term of this Agreement. It is expressly understood that Resident(s) is limited to performing only such acts as may be prescribed by or incidental to his/her residency training program. Therefore, it is agreed that the Resident(s) shall only be permitted to perform those duties within the purview of this Letter of Agreement. It is the resident’s responsibility to obtain the appropriate license in the State of Illinois and to show proof of such license before the commencement of the rotation. School will abide by the policies and procedures as set by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education/(Other)/Not Applicable and Residency Review Committee program requirements. EXCLUDED ENTITY: School shall immediately notify Rush in the event that Facility becomes an excluded entity from a federal health care program. Should the terms and conditions set forth above meet with your approval, please so indicate by signing below where indicated and return one fully executed original to the attention of the undersigned. Agreed and accepted: RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER SCHOOL Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxx, MD (Insert) Associate Xxxx, Graduate Medical Education Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, MD (Insert) Associate Xxxx, Academic Affiliations As read and understood:
Sample 1
Resident Evaluation. In a timely manner, and in accordance with applicable accreditation standards, after completion of each resident’s rotation at the Participating Site, or as otherwise required by the applicable accreditation standards, the Participating Site shall provide the Sponsoring Institution with evaluations of each resident’s performance during the rotation, including completion of such forms as the Sponsoring Institution might provide or approve for such purpose.
Sample 1
Resident Evaluation. In a timely manner, and in accordance with specific CPME standards, after completion of each resident’s rotation to the Participating Institution, or as otherwise required by CPME standards, the Participating Institution shall provide Program evaluations of each resident’s performance during the rotation, including completion of such forms as the Sponsoring Institution might provide or approve for such purpose. Specific methods of resident evaluation for the Program, if any, are set forth in detail on the Program Letter of Agreement(s).
Sample 1
Resident Evaluation 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (15)

Related to Resident Evaluation

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.