Project Feasibility. Provide a proposed schedule detailing the steps necessary for executing the project and a description of how you as the applicant have the necessary technical, managerial, procurement, and financial capability and experience to execute on your proposed project. Click to enter text.
Project Feasibility. As discussed above, all aspects of this project have been demonstrated to be feasible.
Project Feasibility. Provide advice and assistance to District in determining the feasibility of the Project, analysis of the type and quality of materials and construction to be selected, the site location, and other initial planning matters, including, but not limited to, developing a building program identifying and confirming the facility functions, square footage requirements, adjacency relationships, flow diagrams and equipment needs (including a preliminary construction cost estimate based on area costs). Existing equipment needs, data and inventory to be provided by the District.
Project Feasibility. Crompton believes the Project is feasible. Crompton has the resources necessary to carry it out.
Project Feasibility. Provide advice and assistance to WestEd in determining the feasibility of the Project, analysis of the type and quality of materials and construction to be selected, the site location, and other initial planning matters.
Project Feasibility. Provide advice and assistance to City in determining the feasibility of the Project, analysis of the type and quality of materials and construction to be selected, the site location, and other initial planning matters.
Project Feasibility. Financial Cash Flow Analysis The discussion of sources, uses and Project Revenues in Section III above provides a static summary of total financing, total costs and total revenues for the full development of the Project. In actuality, these costs and revenues will be incurred over time from the inception of development planning through the buildout of the Project, and these timing issues have an enormous impact on the overall financial feasibility of the Project. Indeed, full build out of the Project is anticipated to take 15 years, depending on market conditions. As is often the case with large, complex, urban infill revitalization efforts, a large proportion of overall costs must be incurred in the initial years, and revenues follow much later. At Hunters Point Shipyard and Candlestick Point, this is particularly true as a result of the significant infrastructure and transportation improvements that must be made in the early phases to support development of the land. A cash flow proforma analysis (“Proforma”) has been developed based on the current land use plan, and is included as Attachment 3, to estimate the annual timing of the expected revenues and costs associated with the Project. At this stage of Project planning, the Proforma projects an internal rate of return (IRR) for the Project between 15% and 16%. The Developer, the City, and Redevelopment Agency staff agree that, the current IRR supports continued negotiations and private investment to secure entitlements for the Project. However, to achieve a market rate of return that reflects the complexity of the Project, the parties will work cooperatively to reduce risks and uncertainties as the Project progresses to the final agreements and entitlements and to find additional efficiencies or values in the Project.
Project Feasibility. This feasibility of this project is enhanced by the expertise of the group and its access to appropriate disease tissue. The three pronged approach for isolating AB ligands avoids relying on only one methodology. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL ISSUES: CONFIRMING THAT PROPOSED AB BINDING PROTEINS ARE PHYSIOLOGICALLY/PATHOLOGICALLY RELEVANT. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO-GO CRITERIA: NO IDENTIFIED AND VERIFIED (IN VITRO) BINDING PARTNER AFTER 18 MONTH IN VITRO VERIFICATION THAT THE BINDING PROTEIN IS NOT INVOLVED IN AB DEGRADATION (24 MONTH) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROJECT STATUS: (TO BE FILLED OUT BY SAG) Concept research with focus on target identification and validation. The target is a molecule involved in AB degradation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEFINITION OF PROJECT STATUS / PROJECT CRITERIA(S) NECESSARY FOR EXERCISING THE NEGOTIATION RIGHT: 1 The target should be validated: (see Milestone No. 4/no-go criteria) In vitro verification that the binding protein is involved in AB degradation after 24 month.
Project Feasibility. THE PROJECT'S FEASIBILITY IS GOVERNED BY THE EXPERTISE OF THE GROUP AND THEIR CLAIM TO HAVE SUITABLE IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO MODELS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL ISSUES: THE ABILITY OF THE COMPOUNDS TO CROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER. PATHOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BINDING-PRINCIPLE/STAINED STRUCTURES/LABELLED MOLECULES. IP-SITUATION WITH PRANA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO-GO CRITERIA: No proof of concept in vitro with one of the two compounds within 9 months (compound synthesis and blood-brain barrier passage).
