GRANT REVIEW Sample Clauses

GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. DWP will review the Grant during the Funding Period. DWP will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the agreed outputs set out in Annex 4.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will review the Grant during the delivery of the Project Activities and at the conclusion of a Project. The Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will take into account the Project Deliverer’s delivery of the Project Activities against the agreed outputs set out for the Project in Annex 2 in accordance with paragraph 7 of these Conditions.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Department will review the Grant annually. It will take into account the Grantee’s delivery of the Project against the Agreed Outputs and the Project Timetable. As part of each annual review the Department will review the reports produced by the Grantee in accordance with Condition 7.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
GRANT REVIEW. 16.1 The Authority will review the Grant at the end of each Financial Year during the Funding Period. The review will include a financial reconciliation and will take into account the Recipient’s delivery of the Activities and its achievement of the Outcomes.
Sample 1Sample 2
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1 Periodic review The Secretary of State will periodically (and, as a minimum, annually) review the Grant and will take into account the Grant Recipient's delivery of the Funded Activities against the Deliverables.
Sample 1
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Authority will review the Grant every 3 months of the Grant period (being a “Review Period”). The Authority will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the agreed outputs set out in Annex 6 of these Conditions by the Grant Recipient in accordance with paragraph 7.2 of these Conditions.
Sample 1
GRANT REVIEW. Grantee will permit representatives of Grantor to visit Xxxxxxx’s premises and review Xxxxxxx’s activities with respect to the Project, and will permit Grantor, at its own expense, to conduct an independent financial and/or programmatic audit of the expenditure of this grant.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
GRANT REVIEW. The Authority must review the Grant annually after the end of each financial year. The review must take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities. As part of the annual review the Authority must review the reports produced by the Grant Recipient in accordance with paragraph 9.2. Following the review carried out under paragraph 8.1, the Authority may, taking into account any representations made by the Grant Representative in the course of the review, choose to do any of the following:
Sample 1
GRANT REVIEW. Xx. Xxxxx added this to the agenda to discuss the upcoming grant awarding. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated the next meeting is May 18 and there is a following meeting on June 15. Grants are due at the end of the day on May 4. Mr. Xxxxxx suggested that in between May 4 and May 18 that the Board Members can score the grants and bring them with them to the meeting for presentations, more discussion can be made on May 18 as well and possibly award then. He stated that there may be a need for a follow up meeting after the May 18 meeting, but June 15 could be too late if the Board is not in agreement. The scoring matrix will be sent out to the Board. The agencies will present on May 18 and Xx. Xxxxx will work with Xx. Xxxxxxx to create a schedule for agencies presenting. Mr. Xxxxxx suggested the Board can even create the framework for what they expect to hear in those presentations. Xx. Xxxxx suggested this be an in-person meeting and be two hours.
Sample 1

Related to GRANT REVIEW

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Committee Determination Any adjustments or other action pursuant to this Section 4 shall be made by the Committee, and the Committee's determination as to what adjustments shall be made or actions taken, and the extent thereof, shall be final and binding.

  • Questions About Review The Asset Representations Reviewer will make appropriate personnel available to respond in writing to written questions or requests for clarification of any Review Report from the Indenture Trustee or the Servicer until the earlier of (i) the payment in full of the Notes and (ii) one year after the delivery of the Review Report. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to respond to questions or requests for clarification from a Noteholder or any other Person and will direct such Persons to submit written questions or requests to the Indenture Trustee.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance of Reviews The RIRs shall send a request for review to the Operator per email, where they shall specify the areas they request a review for. The Operator must comply with the request by providing the requested information within five working days. The review may include an onsite inspection. In this case the RIRs and the Operator must agree on a specific date for the inspection to take place, which may not be later than sixty calendar days from the date of the request.

  • Performance and Salary Review Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis. Adjustments to salary or other compensation, if any, will be made by Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.