EPRI. “Case Study: Transportation Refrigeration Units”. December 2004. <xxx.xxxx.xxx>. 17 Americas Commercial Transportation Research Company, LLC. State of the Industry Series III: U.S. Trailers. Columbus: ACT Research, 2003. 18 Bald, Xxx. “Hot reefers for cold loads.” Overdrive. June 1997. <xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxx.xxx?xxxxx=1>. result, electric standby equipped TRUs have not achieved significant market penetration in the United States. eTRUs have sufficient cooling capacity to perform temperature pull-downs while operating on a grid-connected power source. These units offer the benefit of maintenance costs that are reduced by roughly 30% as a result of the design using 66% fewer, high reliability electric components19. Similar eTRUs are commonly being used in Europe with much success. A major factor for this success is due to the strict control on noise pollution, more so than because of exhaust emission regulations. The units operate much quieter when operating on grid-connected electricity than on diesel, which eliminates the noise concerns. Shore power connections are rarely, if ever, available at truck stops in Europe. However, many warehouses and distribution centers are powered by 3-phase grid electricity, which is needed to power eTRUs. Additionally, many trucks are partially transported by ferry, and while aboard the TRU engines are not permitted to operate. As a result, electrical connections are available on these ferries. At least 40-50% of European TRUs are capable of being driven electrically.20 Current indicators suggest this figure may be over 70%.21 While the market in the United States consists of approximately 90% trailer transport, only 60% of the European market is trailer-based. Carrier Transicold is the only manufacturer currently offering an eTRU in the United States. The units are currently only available by special order. The environmental benefits of eTRU systems are difficult to quantify to fleet operators. The units are quieter than traditional TRUs and have no on-site emissions while operating on electricity. Unfortunately; these environmental benefits have little influence on truck operators purchasing decisions due to the thin profit margins. At this time, particularly due to a lack of an electrical infrastructure to plug into, truck operators and fleets will find it difficult to recapture the incremental purchase cost of eTRUs. The emissions and noise benefits will not benefit the fleets economically unless they operations are ...
EPRI. Data collected and technology developed under EPRI contracts while employed at Apogee Scientific or EMC Engineering. Technology includes: Mercury Control by Adsorption Processes (MerCAPTM) Chemical additives for enhanced mercury oxidation that have been evaluated during EPRI-funded programs in which employee participated Quick SEM time averaging mercury monitor design Data includes results from tests conducted during EPRI-funded evaluations
EPRI. TE 114126, “The Surface Composition and Solubility of Irradiated Boraflex and Silica Treated in Metal Ion Solutions,” dated November 1999.
EPRI. EPRI is free to promote the Code provided that it does not claim or publish any statements that indicate the NRC’s approval or endorsement of the Code unless approved by the NRC as specified in the Subarticle 1.3, Paragraph (f) of the MOU.
EPRI. Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxx. Xxxx Xxxx, XX 00000 By: Name: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Title: Associate General Counsel Date: April 20, 2020 NRC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 Digitally signed by Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx By: Date: 2020.04.20 06:50:18 -04'00' Name: Title: _Deputy Office Director, NRC/RES Date:
EPRI. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx SPAR Model Development, Level 1 Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 00000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx, XX X0X00 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (301) 415-6857 XXX@xxx.xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Program Manager, Risk and Asset Management Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. 0000 Xxxx X.X. Harris Blvd. Charlotte, NC 00000 (000) 000-0000 xxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx Senior Reliability and Risk Analyst U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 00000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx, XX X00X00 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 (301) 415-6560 XXX0@xxx.xxx
EPRI. Amount of Year Increase From To Reference FY 1982 $550,000.00 $3,282,000.00 $3,832,000.00 EPRI Letter of January 12, , 1982 FY 1982 $290,000.00 $3,832.00.00 $4,122,000.00 EPRI Letter of February 26, 1982
EPRI does not represent or warrant that the use of the Intellectual Property licensed hereunder will be free of infringement of the right of other parties.
EPRI. LICENSEE: Manager, Intellectual Property Ramesh Ratan Electric Power Research American Superconductor Institute Corporation P.O. Box 10412 Two Technology Drive Palo Alto, CA 94303 Westxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 00000 xx to such other address as the addressee shall have last furnished in writing to the addressor.
EPRI com or telephoxx 000-000-4882. The xxectronic files shall be virus checked and accompanied by a hard copy printout that will be used by EPRIsolutions for verification purposes only. Failure to comply with report preparation requirements shall be corrected by CONTRACTOR at its sole expense.
