E-System. (i) Each Borrower Party agrees that Administrative Agent may, but shall not be obligated to, make the Communications (as defined below) available to Lenders by posting the Communications on the Platform.
E-System. The Contractor gives its consent for the introduction during the duration of this Framework Contract of e-System, a platform (or multiple platforms) designed to allow electronic ordering and 3 Europol reserves the right to update the model Specific Contract and Purchase Order during contract implementation.
E-System. The Contractor gives its consent for the introduction during the duration of this Framework Contract of an e-System designed to allow electronic implementation of the Framework Contract, including ordering and invoicing. The application may extend electronic procurement best practice to other areas of contract implementation. It is recognised by both parties that the introduction of such mechanisms implies the need to modify certain implementation and payment provisions of the Framework Contract and both parties shall co-operate in good faith and at no additional cost to achieve this.
E-System. In Year 1 of the CoAg, APHL partnered with the CDC's Division of Laboratory Systems (DLS) to design a new centralized M&E system for the OE20-2001 CoAg for all nine focus areas. In Year 2 of the CoAg, personnel from CDC and APHL prioritized performance measures towards lower reporting effort while sustaining high impact. Original measures were reduced by 65% to 1,152 annually, with 216 narrative (19%), 229 program-specific (20%) and 707 cross-cutting (61%). With 3,010 data points reported across the CoAg by December 2022, six-month and one-year evaluation briefs were produced, co-branded and published to CDC's website (FA A). • Data Modernization Initiative: APHL continued to lead the support of the CDC Data Modernization Initiative, resulting in $1.275 billion in federal funding to improve data management efforts both for CDC and for external partners, including PHLs (FA A). strategies in laboratory capacity and capabilities for public health response workshop” report (FA G). HIGHLIGHTS: SUCCESSES FROM PERFORMANCE MEASURE NARRATIVES Strategy 2: Policy, Partnerships, and Communications • Critical Gaps in Laboratory Capacity and Capabilities: Three feedback sessions were conducted with over 70 Public Health participants to explore critical laboratory gaps. 22 priority laboratory gaps were identified and the results informed CDC and APHL priorities and activities. The sessions guided the development of the “Exploring critical gaps and solution • Data Science: APHL managed 45 needs assessment surveys to support all FAs across the CoAg and oversaw ongoing surveys to support PHLs for reagent and supply allocation, as well as training needs assessments, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. XXXX also responded to 68 data requests and fulfilled 84%. The remaining 16% were not completed because they did not meet APHL's Data Sharing Policy or data were unavailable for dissemination (FA A).
