COST ELIGIBILITY. To be eligible, the direct cost of the action must comply with the eligibility conditions set out in the Grant Agreement Article II.19, Article II.20, is applied to this Collaboration Agreement.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by TAM’s Strategic Plan policies. All costs incurred by RECIPIENT prior to the date of execution of this AGREEMENT shall be ineligible for reimbursement by XXX. Any waiver of cost eligibility policies must be included in RECIPIENT’s Exhibit A approved by TAM.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by TAM’s Expenditure Plan and Strategic Plan policies. Funds may be used for any local transportation need identified by the RECIPIENT’s Public Works Director, including streets and roads projects, local transit projects, bicycle pedestrian projects and other transportation uses, as approved by the RECIPIENT’s governing board. Where feasible, locally defined bicycle and pedestrian projects will be implemented in conjunction with a related roadway improvement. This could include safety improvements, pedestrian facilities including disabled access, or bicycle facilities such as bike lanes or signage.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by TAM’s Strategic Plan policies. All costs incurred by RECIPIENT prior to the date of execution of this AGREEMENT shall be ineligible for reimbursement by XXX, except projects identified in the Strategic Plan as programmatic. Such projects, which rely on ongoing annual funding, may incur costs either at the date of the authorizing Board resolution or the start of the fiscal year, whichever comes later. While these costs shall be eligible for reimbursement in the situations cited above, the timing and amount of reimbursement will be subject to a TAM allocation, based on available revenues, other anticipated project requests, and project category and subcategory limits established in the Expenditure Plan. Any waiver of cost eligibility policies must be included in the Measure B Allocation Request Form as approved by TAM.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by the TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY’S Strategic Plan policies. All costs incurred by RECIPIENT prior to the DATE OF EXECUTION of this AGREEMENT shall be ineligible for reimbursement by the TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, except as follows:
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by NVTA-TA based upon Recipient[City/Town/County]’s approved Project List. Funds may be expended only for streets and roads project(s) included on the Recipient[City/Town/County]’s approved Project List.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by TAM’s Strategic Plan policies. All costs incurred by RECIPIENT prior to the date of execution of this AGREEMENT shall be ineligible for reimbursement by TAM. While the costs of PROJECTS shall be eligible for reimbursement in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT, the timing and amount of reimbursement will be subject to a reimbursement schedule identified in Exhibit A, based on available revenues, other anticipated project requests, and project category and subcategory limits established in the Strategic Plan and Expenditure Plan. Any waiver of cost eligibility policies must be included in RECIPIENT’s Safe Pathway Project Information Sheets approved by TAM.
COST ELIGIBILITY. Cost eligibility shall be determined by the AUTHORITY’S Strategic Plan policies. All costs incurred by RECIPIENT prior to the date of execution of this AGREEMENT shall be ineligible for reimbursement by the AUTHORITY, except in the following situations:
COST ELIGIBILITY. The final component evaluated for eligibility, as shown in Figure 10, are the costs claimed by the Applicant. Not all costs incurred as a result of the incident are eligible. To be eligible, costs must be: Directly tied to the performance of eligible work; Adequately documented;78 78 2 CFR § 200.403(g).
COST ELIGIBILITY. Reduced by all applicable credits, such as insurance proceeds and salvage values;79 Authorized and not prohibited under Federal, State, Territorial, Tribal, or local government laws or regulations; Consistent with the Applicant s internal policies, regulations, and procedures that apply uniformly to both Federal awards and other activities of the Applicant; and Necessary and reasonable to accomplish the work properly and efficiently.80 A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the Applicant makes the decision to incur the cost.81 FEMA determines reasonableness by evaluating whether: The cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the type of facility or work.82 The cost is comparable to the current market price83 for similar goods or services based on: Historical documentation; Average costs in the area; or Published unit costs from national cost estimating databases. Any of the following factors caused escalation of costs: Shortages in equipment, materials, supplies, labor, or contractors. When escalating costs are due to shortages, FEMA considers whether the Applicant s work continued beyond the period of shortages and whether there was an opportunity for the Applicant to obtain more reasonable pricing; Project-specific complexities, such as environmental or historic issues, remote access or location, provision of a unique service with few providers, or elements requiring an extraordinary level of effort; or The Applicant deviated from its established practices.84 Exigent circumstances existed. If so, FEMA evaluates the length of time the circumstances existed compared to the length of time costs were incurred. The Applicant participated in ethical business practices, ensuring parties to a transaction are independent of each other, without familial ties or shared interests and on equal footing without one party having control of the other.85 The Applicant complied with procurement requirements (see Chapter 2:V.G.). The Applicant is responsible for providing documentation to demonstrate its claimed costs are reasonable. If FEMA determines any of the costs to be unreasonable based on its evaluation, 79 Xxxxxxxx Act § 312, 42 U.S.C. § 5155, and 2 CFR § 200.406. 80 2 CFR § 200.403.
