Concluding Clause Samples

Concluding. To summarise, we presented techniques for stepwise decomposition of control systems involving coordination by a controller of a number of devices. The key techniques are:

Concluding. We agree that the Collaborative Process will conclude upon (a) resolution of the Matter as evidenced by a record signed by both of us; (b) resolution of a part of the Matter, evidenced by a record signed by both of us, in which we agree that the remaining parts of the Matter will not be resolved in the Process; or (c) termination of the Process.

Concluding. Many of the Rodin extensions outlined above will be implemented as part of the DEPLOY project. However, we welcome support from other researchers and tool de- velopers in elaborating and realising the roadmap. Furthermore, we anticipate that researchers will investigate and implement Rodin extensions that are not identified in our roadmap. 1. ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Thai ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇: An open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/130/, 2009. 2. ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. An open extensible tool environment for Event-B. In ▇. ▇▇▇ and ▇. ▇▇, editors, ICFEM 2006, volume 4260, pages 588–605. Springer, 2006. 3. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. Contributing to Eclipse. Addison ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2003. We would like to thank the many contributors to the Rodin platform and plug-ins including ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇¨rst, Thai ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇- iasov, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇´▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. In addition, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ provided valuable feedback on the de- sign of the tool. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Systerel, Aix-en-Provence, France ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Abstract. This paper outlines past and foreseen challenges in applying both classical B and event B to design safety related systems in an SME.

Concluding remarks References

Concluding. May – June 2007 • Final discussions and adoption of text of a new Agreement by the Board and Council • Definitive text of Agreement prepared by the Secretariat deposited with the UN, and circulated to Members with procedures for signature

Concluding provisions (1) Amendments and supplements to the present agreement must be in written form. Consequently, these changes of the present agreement shall only be effective if they have been agreed on in writing and have been designated as amendment or supplement of the partnership agreement (the exchange of letters, whereby one project participant proposes the changes to be made and all other project participants expressly agree via postal services, fax and e-mail, is sufficient). The LP shall notify to the MA and the JS any envisaged amendment or supplement of the present agreement in advance to ensure that these modifications are carried out in line with the programme provisions. Modifications to the project that are approved by the responsible programme bodies (programme committee or MA, as appropriate) shall be effective as alterations of the present agreement, also without adherence to the above mentioned formal requirement. (2) Should any provision in this agreement be wholly or partly ineffective, the remaining provisions remain binding for the parties. The parties agree to replace the ineffective provision by one serving the purpose of the agreement as closely as possible. (3) In case of differences that are not ruled by this agreement, the parties agree to find a joint solution. (4) In case of any disputes among themselves, the project participants will endeavour to work towards an amicable settlement. Disputes will be referred to the PSG. Should efforts to achieve an amicable solution fail, the project participants will seek the support of the MA. In case a solution cannot be found, the parties herewith agree that Click here to enter text. shall be the venue for all legal disputes arising from this agreement. (5) Any dispute that, from any reason, fails to be solved by the Project Steering Group and which involves the Lead Partner shall be governed by the law applicable to the Lead Partner, while, if the Lead Partner does not take part in the dispute, the applicable law is the one of the petitioner. (6) One copy will be made of this agreement.

Concluding. May – September 2007 • Discussions and possible adoption of amendments by the Board and Council 2 • Extension for a further period by the Council June 2007 onwards • Contracting Parties notify the Secretary General of the UN of their acceptance of amendments, and the amendment becomes effective 100 days after requirements of number of parties and votes are met October 2007 • Extension of Agreement comes into effect 2 These discussions could continue after the extension enters into force, if necessary. ANNEX II OUTLINE SCHEDULE (for the option of renegotiation) September 2005 • World Coffee Conference – ideas for action put forward • Board and Council examine options for the future of the Agreement and decide that it should be renegotiated October – December 2005 • Preparation by Secretariat of report on progress on achieving the objectives of the Agreement since 2001 January 2006 • Preliminary statements by Members setting out views and expectations • Executive Board examines the report on progress and results of the survey of Members, and agrees on working procedures and a schedule of work • Establishment of a Working Group and Terms of Reference (if required) February – April 2006 • Survey/ED document circulated to Members, the PSCB and relevant international organizations inviting comments on the Agreement and proposals for renegotiation • Circulation of working papers and proposals by Members May 2006 • Proposals and working papers reviewed and discussed by the Executive Board/ Working Group • Report and recommendations to the Council June – August 2006 • Draft working text (containing proposals for a new Agreement) prepared by the Secretariat and circulated for discussion September 2006 • Draft text reviewed by the Executive Board/Working Group. • Report and recommendations to the Council • Progress reviewed and schedule of work for the next coffee year agreed by the Council October – December 2006 • The Secretariat consults Members and provides further clarifications and briefings as needed • Additional meetings of the Executive Board/Working Group if required January 2007 • Discussions on draft text continue by the Board/Working Group February – April 2007 • Further clarifications/revised texts provided by the Secretariat as needed • Additional meetings of Board/Working Group if required

Concluding. Provisions Each participating student shall be responsible for obtaining a visa and necessary travel documents. Furthermore, the Parties shall provide assistance, wherever necessary, in order to meet the relevant visa requirements, as well as finalize other necessary formalities. The Parties’ obligations under this Agreement do not extend to the spouses or family members of participating students. The expenses of accompanying spouses and family members must be borne by the persons mentioned above. The Parties hereby guarantee that they will request and process personal data (hereinafter “PD”), including PD transmitted verbally, only to the extent considered necessary to properly exercising the provisions of this Agreement and as per applicable laws. The Parties hereby agree that any failure to provide the necessary PD can make it partially or completely impossible to fulfil the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Only data that has undergone anonymization can be processed for statistical purposes and consequently disclosed to public authorities, legal entities and individuals with respect to those cases established by relevant legislation. Anonymization hereby implies the modification of PD, whereby the details of personal or actual circumstances can no longer be assigned to a specific or identifiable natural person, or only with expenditure of time, costs and labour effort disproportionate to the results. The Parties shall inform each other about the contact details of contact persons responsible for the processing of PD, including their telephone numbers and e-mail addresses. The terms for PD processing shall be provided in the Annex 3 hereto. The Parties adhere to the assumption that any action under this Agreement shall not infringe upon the powers and rights of either Party. In all cases, this Agreement only applies to the extent in which it does not contradict the national legislation of the Parties. To resolve doubts that may arise in the execution and interpretation of this agreement, the Parties will make every effort to seek a consensual solution. In the impossibility of consensus, the contracting parties will indicate, by joint agreement, a third party, an individual, to act as a mediator. This Agreement is drawn up in English and Russian in 2 (two) original copies. In case of discrepancies in the text, the English version shall prevail. Annexes 1 and 2 form an integral part of the Agreement. Annexes 1, 2 and 3 form an integral part of the A...

Concluding local agreements