Cost Benefit Analysis. Section 18-2113 of the Act, further requires the Authority conduct a cost benefit analysis of the plan amendment in the event that Tax Increment Financing will be used. This analysis must address specific statutory issues.
Cost Benefit Analysis. This Plan when presented for recommendation and approval shall be accompanied by a cost benefit analysis. Such analysis is as follows:
Cost Benefit Analysis. Section 552a(u)(4) of the Privacy Act provides that a cost-benefit analysis must be completed prior to the approval of this Agreement. In addition to the computer matching program subject to this Agreement, CMS has computer matching agreements with other federal agencies and Administering Entities under which CMS receives data matches through the Hub from multiple source agencies, and CMS and Administering Entities access data matches for the purpose of making Eligibility Determinations related to enrollment in a Qualified Health Plan or Insurance Affordability Program. CMS has conducted one cost-benefit analysis covering these computer matching agreements. This cost-benefit analysis is attached as Attachment A.
Cost Benefit Analysis. Section 15(a) of the CEA 37 requires the Commission to consider the costs and benefits of its actions before issuing a rulemaking under the CEA. By its terms, section 15(a) does not require the Commission to quantify the costs and benefits of a new regulation or to determine whether the benefits of the rule outweigh its costs; rather, it requires that the Commission ‘‘consider’’ the costs and benefits of its actions.
Cost Benefit Analysis. Pursuant to Section 18-2113 of the Act, this Plan when presented for recommendation and approval shall be accompanied by a cost benefit analysis. The cost-benefit analysis is available for public inspection at the City of Lexington City Offices, 000 X 0xx, Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000. Such analysis is as follows:
Cost Benefit Analysis. A. Cost-Benefit Analysis As directed by the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. § 552a(u)(4)(A), the FCC has conducted a cost-benefit analysis of this matching program. This analysis, which is attached to this Agreement as Attachment 1, demonstrates that the Federal Programs are likely to be cost effective, and includes a specific estimate of any savings.
Cost Benefit Analysis. Section 15(a) of the Act requires the Commission to consider the costs and benefits of its action before issuing a new regulation under the Act. By its terms, section 15(a) does not require the Commission to quantify the costs and benefits of a new regulation or to determine whether the benefits of the proposed regulation outweigh its costs. Rather, section 15(a) simply requires the Commission to ‘‘consider the costs and possessions, or the applicant is otherwise able to benefits’’ of its action. Section 15(a) demonstrate that it has adopted appropriate procedures for producing its books and records in the United States expeditiously upon request, and the applicant can and does represent that it will comply with such procedures.’’ Staff Letter 87–10, [1987–1990 Transfer Binder] Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 23,999 (Dec. 9, 1987). (Emphasis in original.) 16 47 FR 18618–18621 (April 30, 1982). 17 Pub. L. 104–13 (May 13, 1995). further specifies that costs and benefits shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas of market and public concern: Protection of market participants and the public; efficiency, competitiveness, and financial integrity of futures markets; price discovery; sound risk management practices; and other public interest considerations. Accordingly, the Commission could in its discretion give greater weight to any one of the five enumerated areas and could in its discretion determine that, notwithstanding its costs, a particular rule was necessary or appropriate to protect the public interest or to effectuate any of the provisions or to accomplish any of the purposes of the Act. The Commission published an analysis of costs and benefits when it proposed the rule amendments that have now been adopted.18 It did not receive any public comments pertaining to the analysis. List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 30 Definitions, Foreign futures, Foreign options, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Registration requirements. ■ In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority contained in the Commodity Exchange Act and, in particular, sections 2(a)(1), 4(b), 4c and 8 thereof, 7 U.S.C. 2, 6(b), 6c and 12a, and pursuant to the authority contained in 5 U.S.C. 552 and 552b, the Commission hereby amends Chapter I of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
Cost Benefit Analysis. We will perform a cost analysis of procurement options for material and labor of construction and maintenance. Recommended partnership and ownership models will be included in this analysis. Finally, we will provide an analysis and guidance on recommended Broadband deployment options available to the county. We will also prepare a county resource plan for implementation and operation phases.
Cost Benefit Analysis. The cost benefit analysis (Attachment 2) conducted for the PARIS matching programs (including this matching program using DoD data, and a related matching program using Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) data) demonstrates their likelihood to be cost effective. In addition to certain qualitative benefits, the analysis reflects total federal and state agency costs of approximately $3,944,915.72 per year, and total state benefits savings of approximately $221,427,015.00 per year.1 1 The estimated state benefits of this matching program are based on a 2007 cost-benefit analysis undertaken by HHS/ACF to assess the potential impact of PARIS on state programs system-wide. Although a similar systemic study has not been conducted in recent years, ACF estimates the current benefits of PARIS are at least as large as the 2007 estimate. In the 2007 analysis there were 40 states participating in PARIS and today all 50 States, District of Columbia and Puerto Rico participate in PARIS.
Cost Benefit Analysis. Cost Benefit Analysis is required in Art; 157 §3 and 157 §4 of the IPA implementing regulation. In addition to the summary elements to be provided, the full cost-benefit analysis docu- ment shall be provided in support of this application as Annex
