Activity Levels Sample Clauses

Activity Levels. The agreed indicative level of activity for this service is: Interventional cardiology procedures Diagnostic‌‌ Interventional Electrophysiology lists 120 60‌ 60‌ 12‌ Surgical procedures 120-130 Cardiac MRIs (reviews, follow up and diagnostics) 650 Pulmonary hypertension patients 45 Consultations (assessment and follow up) Obstetrics (new and return patients)‌ Transition - (this does not represent the transition population and it is likely that this number may increase) 1400 172‌ 64*‌ *It is noted that this number represents the number of appointments, but does not represent the target population which is significantly higher; numbers could increase over time.‌ NSD in partnership with the Provider will continually review the services’ ability to meet indicated levels and consider and agree variations required. This will include any associated changes to the financial profile.‌

Activity Levels. The agreed indicative levels of activity for this service demonstrate the incremental increase in activity over recent years: New appointments AHF Clinic: includes new outpatient assessment‌‌ 65 Return appointments: includes AHF outpatients‌ 490 Routine inpatient assessment‌‌ - patients being worked up for transplant - patient that needs e.g. biopsy 100 Post Heart transplant follow up appointments‌‌ 1170 Short term ventricular assist devices as bridge to cardiac transplant Impella devices‌‌ Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to cardiac transplant‌‌ 3 5‌‌ 35 Long term ventricular assist devices as bridge to cardiac transplant 1‌ Actual activity should be reported monthly to NSD via the Teams Channel.‌‌ NSD in partnership with the Provider will continually review the services’ ability to meet indicated levels and consider and agree variations required. This may include changes to the financial profile.‌‌

Activity Levels. 2.5.1 Activity

Activity Levels. If the institutions described in this paper primarily matter because of their influence on error, then all else equal, those circuits which have adopted them should make fewer mistakes in panel cases and thus have reduced demand for en banc review. By contrast, if the institutions matter because they influence conflict on the Courts of Appeals, the effects on en banc review should be mixed, with some specific institutions making review more likely and others making it less likely.