Basis of Claims. (1) The Provider may claim a payment from Te Whatu Ora if the Provider has provided the Services and Dispensed the Pharmaceuticals in accordance with:
Basis of Claims. Subject to the provisions related to the applicability of OMB Circular A-87, all claims for HAVA funds under this program must be based on invoices submitted by County. All invoices or agreements that are the subject of any claims must relate directly to expenditures authorized pursuant to Exhibit A – SOW, Paragraph E –
Basis of Claims. Subject to the provisions related to the applicability of 2 CFR 200, all claims for HAVA funds under this program must be based on invoices submitted by County. All invoices or agreements that are the subject of any claims must relate directly to expenditures authorized pursuant to Paragraph D (‘Uses of Funds’) of Exhibit A ‘Scope of Work’.
Basis of Claims. The provisions of this Agreement constitute the sole procedure for the processing and settlement of any claim by an Employee or the Union of a violation by the Company of this Agreement. As the representative of the Employees, the Union may process complaints and grievances through the complaint and grievance procedure, including arbitration, in accordance with this Agreement or adjust or settle the same.
Basis of Claims. Claiming procedures
Basis of Claims. 1.1 For the avoidance of doubt, the parties agree that the basis for all Claims and Tax Claims brought by any of the parties will, in accordance with ordinary contractual principles, arise in respect of the acquisition by the Purchaser of the Shares pursuant to this Agreement.
Basis of Claims. On September 18, 2009, HLBE filed a Demand in the arbitration captioned Heron Lake BioEnergy, LLC, Claimant x. Xxxxx, Inc., Respondent, American Arbitration Association Case No. 65 110 J 00190 09 (the “Arbitration”). In the Arbitration, HLBE asserts breach of contract, warranty claims and other claims against Xxxxx for alleged design defects, warranty failures and other alleged problems relating to the Project (collectively, the “HLBE Claims”) and seeks to recover $22,800,000 in damages plus interest thereon, plus its costs and disbursements and reasonable attorneys’ fees (collectively, the “HLBE Claimed Damages”). On January 4, 2010, Xxxxx filed a request that ICM be joined as a party to the Arbitration, asserting that ICM was a subcontractor on the Project and performed the work that is the subject of the Arbitration, and that the Contract Documents included in the Design-Build Contract as well as contract documents between Xxxxx and ICM require ICM to defend and indemnify Xxxxx for the HLBE Claims deriving from ICM’s work. On May 14, 2010, as revised on June 3, 2010, the R-7 Arbitrator appointed to determine the joinder request ordered joinder of ICM in the Arbitration. On June 22, 2010, the Case Manager in the Arbitration confirmed the agreement of HLBE, Xxxxx, and ICM to extend the due dates for Xxxxx to file its third party demand against ICM to July 16, 2010 and for ICM answer to the third party demand to August 2, 2010, and therefore no third party demands or answers have been made in connection with the ICM joinder to the Arbitration. On January 5, 2010, Xxxxx filed an answer that denied liability for the HLBE Claims and denied responsibility for the HLBE Claimed Damages. In addition, Xxxxx asserted counterclaims against HLBE for breach of contract and unjust enrichment/quantum meruit (the “Xxxxx Claims”) and sought to recover $3,834,319.00 in retainage held by HLBE under Design-Build Contract, $2,162,236.36 in additional costs related to work and/or materials it has provided to HLBE, plus its costs and disbursements and reasonable attorneys’ fees (collectively, the “Xxxxx Claimed Damages”).
Basis of Claims. (1) The Provider may claim a payment from the DHB if the Provider has provided the Services and Supplied the Pharmaceuticals in accordance with:
