Views of EESAI Sample Clauses

Views of EESAI. EESAI noted that the Board approved the Consultation Agreement dated November 23, 2000 in Decision 2001-87. The Consultation Agreement between provided for ongoing consultations between EESAI and the Consultation Parties in respect to both implementing the 2001-2005 Plan and amending and adjusting the energy prices enacted set up in the Plan from time to time. XXXXX stated that it had followed the process set out in the 2001-2005 Plan, which contemplated discussions between EESAI and the Consultation Parties – and no others for consideration of amendments to the Plan. It noted that such discussions had been undertaken for the 2002 Plan, which had been subsequently approved by the Board. XXXXX submitted that all such negotiations had been carried out in accordance with the Board’s Negotiated Settlement Guidelines. XXXXX noted that each of the Consultation Parties was given notice of and participated in discussions and received comprehensive information. XXXXX submitted that the Consultation Parties unanimously accepted the 2003 Settlement Agreement, and that EESAI therefore had nothing to report to the Board with regards to dissenting opinions regarding the Settlement. XXXXX submitted that, by definition arising in the 2001-2005 Plan, the Consultation Parties are the only parties with an interest in the discussions concerning possible amendments and adjustments to the Plan. EESAI noted that the Board in Decision 2000-74 approved the 2001- 2005 Plan. XXXXX argued that if SPPA wished to be included as a party with an interest in those discussions, it could have applied for a review and variation on Decision 2000-74. XXXXX noted that, in accordance with the 2002 Plan, it began discussions with the Consultation Parties prior to July 31, 2002. As required by the approved Plan, an independent advisor was retained to advise on energy acquisition. A Board observer was also present for all but the first consultation meeting. It stated that all discussions were conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Board’s Negotiated Settlement Guidelines. EESAI submitted that approval of the 2003 Plan was in the public interest. It stated that the 2003 Plan built on the extensive experience gained by EESAI, the Consultation Parties and the independent adviser from developing and implementing the 2001-2005 Plan and the 2002 Plan. It noted that the resulting rates would offer customers a high degree of stability. It stated that quarterly adjustments would reflect seasonal...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Views of EESAI

  • SUB-CONTRACTORS Transfer Agent may, without further consent on the part of Customer, subcontract with other subcontractors for telephone and mailing services as may be required from time to time; provided, however, that the Transfer Agent shall be as fully responsible to the Customer for the acts and omissions of any subcontractor as it is for its own acts and omissions.

  • Professional Growth and Improvement Plans A. Professional growth and improvement plans shall be developed as follows:

  • Respectful Workplace a. The Employer is committed to taking appropriate measures to create and maintain a workplace that is respectful and free from inappropriate workplace behavior for all Agency employees pursuant to the statewide policy titled ‘Maintaining a Professional Workplace Policy’ (50.010.03).

  • Professional Growth Plan A written plan, self-directed or jointly developed between the teacher and evaluator, designed for the sole purpose of continuing teacher growth focused on areas identified in the teacher’s observations and/or evaluation. The approved form for the Professional Growth Plan is found at Ohio ES.

  • HIRING CONTRACTORS The Owner hereby gives power to the Agent to contract, hire, supervise and/or discharge firms and persons, including utilities, required for the operation and maintenance of the Property. The Agent may perform any of the Agent’s duties through attorneys, agents, employees, or independent contractors and, except for persons working in the Agent’s firm, shall not be responsible for their acts, omissions, defaults, negligence and/or costs of same.

  • Contractor’s Key Personnel The Contractor shall use adequate numbers of qualified individuals with suitable training, education, experience and skill to perform the Services. The Contractor has been selected to perform the Services herein, in part, because of the skills and expertise of the key individuals and/or firms (collectively “Contractor’s Key Personnel”) that are listed in Exhibit F. Substitution or replacement of the individuals and/or firms identified in Exhibit F is not allowed except with written approval of the AOC If the designated lead or key person fails to perform to the satisfaction of the AOC upon written notice, the Contractor will have fifteen (15) calendar days to remove that person from the Project and replace that person with one acceptable to the AOC. All lead or key personnel for any Subcontractor must also be designated by any Subcontractor and are subject to all conditions stated in this section. The Contractor shall be responsible for all costs associated with replacing any of Contractor’s Key Personnel, including the additional costs to familiarize replacement personnel with the Services. If the Contractor does not furnish replacement personnel acceptable to the AOC, the AOC may terminate this Agreement for cause. Prior to the authorization of any Phase of the Agreement, the parties will agree upon any Key Personnel applicable to that Phase. Said personnel shall be documented in Exhibit F. Standard of Care The Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, Subcontractors, consultants and any persons or entities for whom Contractor is responsible, shall provide all Services pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement and in a manner consistent with the standard of care under California law applicable to those who specialize in providing such services for projects of the type, scope, and complexity of the Project. The AOC’s Acceptance of any submittals, deliverables, or other work product of the Contractor shall not be construed as assent that Contractor has complied, nor in any way relieve the Contractor of, compliance with (i) the applicable standard of care or (ii) applicable statutes, regulations, rules, guidelines, and requirements. AOC’s Quality Assurance Plan The AOC or its agent may evaluate Contractor’s performance under this Agreement. Such evaluation may include assessing Contractor’s compliance with all Agreement terms and performance standards. Any deficiencies in the Contractor’s performance that the AOC determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Agreement in jeopardy if not corrected, will be reported to the Contractor’s principal. The report may include recommended improvements and corrective measures to be taken by the Contractor. If the Contractor’s performance remains unsatisfactory, the AOC may, without limitation, terminate this Agreement for cause or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. Any evaluation of Contractor’s performance conducted by the AOC shall not be construed as an Acceptance of the Contractor’s work product or methods of performance. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the work product that Contractor and its Subcontractors deliver under this Agreement. Contractor shall not rely on AOC to perform any quality control review of Contractor’s work product, as such review shall be conducted by Contractor.

  • Vendor Encouraging Members to bypass TIPS agreement Encouraging entities to purchase directly from the Vendor or through another agreement, when the Member has requested using the TIPS cooperative Agreement or price, and thereby bypassing the TIPS Agreement is a violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and will result in removal of the Vendor from the TIPS Program.

  • CONTRACTOR’S PRE-EXISTING WORKS A. To the extent that Contractor incorporates into the Work Product any works of Contractor that were created by Contractor or that Contractor acquired rights in prior to the Effective Date of this Contract (“Incorporated Pre-existing Works”), Contractor retains ownership of such Incorporated Pre-existing Works.

  • Contractor’s Documents Any licensing and maintenance agreement, or any order-specific agreement or document, including any pre-installation, linked or “click through” agreement that is allowed by, referenced within or incorporated within the Contract whenever the Contract is used for a State procurement, whether directly by the Contractor or through a Contractor’s agent, subcontractor or reseller, is agreed to only to the extent the terms within any such agreement or document do not conflict with the Contract or applicable Minnesota or Federal law, and only to the extent that the terms do not modify, diminish or derogate the terms of the Contract or create an additional financial obligation to the State. Any such agreement or document must not be construed to deprive the State of its sovereign immunity, or of any legal requirements, prohibitions, protections, exclusions or limitations of liability applicable to this Contract or afforded to the State by Minnesota law. A State employee’s decision to choose “accept” or an equivalent option associated with a “click- through” agreement does not constitute the State’s concurrence or acceptance of terms, if such terms are in conflict with this section. State Audits.

  • Audit of Existing Content and Functionality By May 1, 2017, the District will propose for OCR’s review and approval the identity and bona fides of an Auditor (corporation or individual) to audit all content and functionality on its website, including, but not limited to, the home page, all subordinate pages, and intranet pages and sites, to identify any online content or functionality that is inaccessible to persons with disabilities, including online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third party vendor or an open source. The Auditor will have sufficient knowledge and experience in website accessibility for people with disabilities to carry out all related tasks, including developing a Proposed Corrective Action Plan. The Audit will use the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set out above, unless the District receives prior permission from OCR to use a different standard as a benchmark. During the Audit, the District will also seek input from members of the public with disabilities, including parents, students, employees, and others associated with the District, and other persons knowledgeable about website accessibility, regarding the accessibility of its online content and functionality.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.