Superintendent Evaluation Sample Clauses

Superintendent Evaluation. The Board shall evaluate, in writing, the Superintendent’s performance at least once each year during the term of this contract. The evaluation format and procedure shall comply with the law and Board policy. Unless the Superintendent expressly requests otherwise, the Board shall conduct the evaluation of the Superintendent in closed session. In addition, the Board shall treat the completed evaluation instrument as confidential to the extent required or permitted by law. However, the Board and Superintendent may share the Superintendent’s completed evaluation instrument with their respective legal counsel.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Superintendent Evaluation. The BOARD shall evaluate the performance of the SUPERINTENDENT at least annually during the term of this contract. This evaluation shall take place prior to the BOARD’S regular July meeting of each year. Such evaluation shall be based on the duties and responsibilities of the SUPERINTENDENT as set forth by the laws of the State of Tennessee and this contract. The SUPERINTENDENT shall submit to the BOARD a recommended format for such evaluation hereinafter referred to as “Evaluation Format” on or before April 1 of each year of this contract. The BOARD shall meet to discuss the evaluation format with the SUPERINTENDENT and attempt in good faith to agree on the development and adoption of a mutually agreeable evaluation format. The evaluation shall include a recommendation for improvement in any areas where the BOARD deems the SUPERINTENDENT’s performance to be unsatisfactory or in need of improvement. A copy of the written evaluation shall be delivered to the SUPERINTENDENT on or before August 1 of each year of his employment. The SUPERINTENDENT shall have the right to make a written or oral response to the evaluation. Within thirty (30) days of delivery of the evaluation results of the SUPERINTENDENT, the BOARD shall meet with the SUPERINTENDENT to discuss the evaluation.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. (a) Within ninety (90) days after the date on which Xxxxxxx shall first report for duty, Xxxxxxx and the Board of Trustees will establish written guidelines with respect to the working relationship and communications between Xxxxxxx and the Board. During the first year of the Term of this Agreement, the Board of Trustees will provide at least two (2) early performance reviews of Xxxxxxx the first occurring four (4) months from the date on which Superintendent shall first report for duty and the second, ten (10) months after such date. Such reviews will be conducted in an informal setting (subject to the requirements of the Open Meetings Act) at which Xxxxxxx and members of the Board of Trustees will be present.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. 3.1 Not later than May 1, 2018, SUPERINTENDENT shall submit to BOARD a model evaluation instrument. On June 6, 2018, SUPERINTENDENT and BOARD shall meet to discuss and agree on the instrument to be used for SUPERINTENDENT’s evaluation.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. The BOARD shall evaluate the SUPERINTENDENT according to applicable BOARD Policy and State Law. In the event of conflict between Policy and Law, State Law shall govern. The SUPERINTENDENT's contractual status shall be reviewed at the time the evaluation is handled. No later than June 30 of each contract year, the BOARD will complete the written evaluation of the Superintendent.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. The Superintendent's performance shall be evaluated by the Board at least annually using multiple rating categories that take into account data on student growth as a significant factor, along with other readily definable objectives. The Board and Superintendent will comply with State Law on evaluation procedures and timelines. Once determined, the appropriate language will be inserted into this clause of the contract. No later than January 31 of each contract year, the Board will complete the written evaluation of the Superintendent. Once a written evaluation of the Superintendent has been completed, the renewal of another year will be determined no later than April 1 of the current year.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Superintendent Evaluation

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 11.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.