Punishments Sample Clauses

Punishments. The submissive and the Dominant agree that appropriate punishments are necessary for the growth of the submissive. Punishments are dependent on the severity of the infraction. Punishments will be used to change the behavior and remind the submissive of this agreement. Dominant will inform submissive that she is being punished when punishment occurs. He will explain the reason for punishment either before, during, or following punishment. The Dominant agrees to discipline only out of a desire to better the submissive, and further agrees to never punish out of, or during, feelings of anger.

Punishments. 1. For minor offenses: a). - Verbal reprimand.

Punishments. 1. For minor misdemeanours: a).- Verbal reprimand.

Punishments. Mild Punishments can include: slapping, ear or nipple pinching, cropping, hair pulling, going to bed early, time-outs Medium Punishments can include multiple slapping, genital pinching, intense bondage time, clamps and weights. Severe Punishments can include panty or ball gags, leg chains and/or handcuffs, caning. Drinking and Drugs The slave is allowed to drink alcohol or use _ drugs only with explicit permission from the Owner, when and where and how much [he/she] permits. Drinking [will/will not] be permitted when going out to eat, [limited to 1 or 2 drinks with permission]. The slave may attend bars, etc., only with Owner, or with [his/her] permission to go with anyone else. The slave must ask permission for each and every drink.

Punishments. Even if ▇▇▇▇▇▇ declined to scrutinize carefully the draft’s illusory improvements, he did attempt to take ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to task on the law’s austere disciplinary regime. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ first singled out the draft’s system of double punishments. In the ordinance, an immi- grant’s term of indenture could be extended not just for length of deser- tion, but also for the time spent in prison to punish that desertion.102 For example, if an Indian was convicted of deserting her plantation for two weeks, and for that violation was required to serve a two-week prison term, her indenture could be extended for four weeks. Compare this to British Guiana’s 1873 ordinance, under which indenture could be ex- tended only for the period of time an immigrant deserted her plantation, or for the period she spent in prison as punishment for a crime that was not a violation of the indenture law.103 Using the same example, only a two-week extension would be allowed. Where British Guiana prior to 1873 permitted an extension scheme of the kind ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ proposed, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ explained that the inquiry commissioners denounced that provi- sion as excessive punishment.104 Realizing that ▇▇▇▇▇▇ was again invoking the British Guiana inquiry to corner him, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ wrote: “[I]t may appear strange that . . . I have not strictly adhered to the recommendation of the Commissioners.”105 He explained his change of heart — it would be unfair to planters to lose labor as their “incorrigible” laborer served time in prison.106 “Discipline must be maintained,” he continued, “and an example must now and again be made of some constant offender even on the best regulated plantations.”107 To tailor the law for these repeat offenders, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ revised the draft by adding a provision granting the magistrate discretion to determine the punishment for desertion.108 So too did he alter the extension clause, cabining double-punishment extensions to only desertions109 and the catchall labor penalty, which allowed the planter to punish his laborer for failing “to show ordinary diligence” on the job.110 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ persisted to argue that employers just as often abused 102 Id. 103 Id. 104 Id. 105 Letter from Agent-Gen. of Immigr. for Fiji to Officiating Sec’y to the Gov’t of India (Dec. 27, 1877) [hereinafter Dec. 27, 1877 Letter], ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇ [https:// ▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇]. 106 Id. 107 Id. 108 Id. 109 Id. 110 An Ordinance with Regard to Immigration, 1877, § 68 ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/ view...