PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS Sample Clauses

PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. There have been no specific Commission actions or briefings related to the Bio-Barge Research Project.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. December 10, 2013 – the Commission adopted the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy 2013 Update. • December 3, 2013 – the Commission was briefed on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy 2013 Update. • June 25, 2013 – the Commission was briefed on the draft 2013 update to the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy. • December 4, 2012 – the Commission was briefed on the results of the 2011 Puget Sound Maritime Air Emissions Inventory and options for accelerating the NWPCAS truck goals. • May 1, 2012 – the Commission authorized to sign agreement 20090046 Amendment 5 with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to transfer $1,050,000 in funds to support the implementation of the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy. Amendment 5 increased the total amount transferred from the Port to PSCAA since 2009 to $5,216,250. • February 7, 2012 – the Commission was briefed on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy and on the Port’s current air quality program effort, and draft recommendations on options for accelerating Seaport Clean Air Strategy goals. • July 12, 2011 – the Commission was briefed on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy 2010 Implementation Report and interim report on Accelerating Clean Air Goals. • February 1, 2011 – the Commission authorized to sign agreement 20090046 Amendment 4 with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to transfer $1,160,250 in funds to support the implementation of the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy, and to extend the end date from June 30, 2011, to June 30, 2013. Amendment 4 increased the total amount transferred from the Port to PSCAA since 2009 to $4,166,250. • January 4, 2011 – the Commission adopted the “Motion to Accelerate Seaport Clean Air Goals to 2015.” • December 7, 2010 – the Commission was briefed on the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Status. • November 9, 2010 – the Commission authorized to increase the amount of the At-Berth Clean Fuels Vessel Incentive Program by $110,250, for a total 2010 annual program budget of $951,750, to cover participation by the projected number of qualifying vessel visits for the remainder of the year. • June 8, 2010 – the Commission authorized to supplement the value of the At-Berth Clean Fuels Vessel Incentive Program by $541,500, for a total 2010 annual program budget of $841,500. Within the $541,500, $135,000 represents funds that were originally approved in 2009, but were not used until 2010. • January 12, 2010 – the Commission was briefed on the Seaport’s Air Quality Program. • A...
Sample 1
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. March 12, 2019 –The Commission approved a three-year IDIQ contract in the amount of $1,000,000 for similar services. June 28, 2016 – The Commission approved a three-year IDIQ contract in the amount of
Sample 1
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. June 22, 2021 – The Commission authorized the Executive Director to (1) execute a Tenant Reimbursement Agreement in the amount of $7,245,000 with Delta Air Lines Inc. for both design and construction of a new passenger boarding gate at Gate A12A at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and (2) expend $2,093,000 of non-tenant reimbursement Port costs associated with this project. The total project cost is $9,338,000. (CIP #C801160)
Sample 1
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. On August 9, 2011, the Commission authorized entering into a lease termination agreement for the former Borders bookstore location at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, including the payment of $70,000 to the Borders Group, Inc., bankruptcy estate in consideration for the lease termination and release of the Airport lease from the bankruptcy liquidation proceedings.
Sample 1
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. May 13, 2008, the Commission authorized execution of Lease Agreements with the majority of the existing rental car companies.
Sample 1
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS. December 4, 2012 – the Port Commission authorized the Chief Executive Officer to execute a contract with the FAA for relocation of the Airport Surface Detection Equipment Model X Remote Unit Number 7 (ASDE-X RU No. 7) antenna at Seattle- Tacoma International Airport, at a cost not to exceed $300,000.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Community Engagement Integration Activities The SP will support the HSP to engage the community of diverse persons and entities in the area where it provides health services when setting priorities for the delivery of health services and when developing plans for submission to the LHIN including but not limited to CAPS and integration proposals.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS COMMITTEE Section 1. The Employer and the Federation agree to the establishment of Labor- Management Relations Committees for Divisions represented by the Federation. The purpose of these Committees is to discuss any item of concern, including safety, to either party and to improve communications between the Employer and the members of the bargaining unit.

  • Labour Management Relations Committee 20.01 The parties recognize that a forum for ongoing discussions during the term of the Agreement can promote more harmonious labour relations between them.

  • Negotiations Committee H.3 At all negotiations meetings with the Employer representatives for a renewal of this Agreement, the Union may be represented by a negotiations committee composed of five (5) bargaining unit members. No deduction from the regular pay of such Employees will be made for attendance at such meetings with the Employer’s representatives held during the Employee's regular working hours. The Union has the right to have up to an additional five (5) members, including Union Officers, on the Negotiating Committee at no cost to the Employer.

  • CENTRAL LABOUR RELATIONS COMMITTEE C4.1 OPSBA, the Crown and OSSTF agree to establish a joint Central Labour Relations Committee to promote and facilitate communication between rounds of bargaining on issues of joint interest.

  • Trustee’s Good Faith Action, Expert Advice, No Bond or Surety The exercise by the Trustees of their powers hereunder shall be binding upon everyone interested in or dealing with the Trust. A Trustee shall be liable to the Trust and to any Shareholder solely for his or her own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of the office of Trustee, and shall not be liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law. The Trustees may take advice of counsel or other experts with respect to the meaning and operation of this Declaration of Trust, and shall be under no liability for any act or omission in accordance with such advice nor for failing to follow such advice. The Trustees shall not be required to give any bond as such, nor any surety if a bond is required.

  • CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment - Continued If you answered "No, Vendor does not certify - Lobbying to Report" to the above attribute question, you must download, read, execute, and upload the attachment entitled "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL", as instructed, to report the lobbying activities you performed or paid others to perform. 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Federal Rule Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (Contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000) Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members requires the proposer certify that in performance of the contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $250,000, the vendor will be in compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). Does vendor certify compliance? Yes 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Procurement of Recovered Materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include: (1) procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; (2) procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. Does vendor certify that it is in compliance with these provisions? Yes 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Rights to Inventions If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR §401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. Pursuant to the above, when the foregoing applies to ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that during the term of an award resulting from this procurement process, Vendor agrees to comply with all applicable requirements as referenced in the Federal rule above. Does vendor certify? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.