OUTLIERS Sample Clauses
OUTLIERS. Employees who are earning more base salary than the amount of the base salary assigned to the step where the employee belongs. The District shall provide a list of all outliers to the Association annually including their name, SAP number, pay grade, step and/or years of experience as appropriate, and base salary. Employees transferring into the unit will be placed at the pay grade and experience level commensurate with the position and the employee’s years of qualified experience. No new outliers will be created unless specifically agreed upon by the bargaining teams of both the District and the Association. Should such an agreement be made, a list of the affected employees shall be made including the name of the affected employee and their category prior to reaching tentative agreement.
OUTLIERS. Further discussion regarding the outliers will occur in the spring 2017 semester. APPENDIX E Pursuant to the Education Employment Relations Act, the Napa Valley Community College District (District) and the Napa Valley College Faculty Association (Association) agree as follows: The MOU for Program/Department Coordinators, which was signed on October 20 and October 21, 2016 is incorporated into this MOU by reference and hereinafter referred to as the October 2016 Program/Department Coordinator MOU. The October 2016 Program/Department Coordinator MOU states: “Program/Department coordinator stipends and reassigned time percentages for spring 2017 and the 2017-2018 academic year will be documented in an MOU signed by the District and Association. Each spring the District and Association will document the program/department coordinator annual stipends based on step 8 of the existing CBA salary schedule as indicated below. Annual stipends will be incorporated into the corresponding year’s Contract/Regular Academic Faculty Salary Schedule.” The Association and District agree the program/department coordinator annual stipends and reassigned percentages beginning with the Spring 2017 semester are documented on Appendix A, which is attached. All other terms and conditions of the October 2016 Program/Department Coordinator MOU are incorporated into this MOU by reference. This agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by both parties. The parties further agree to continue to bargain the successor contract to the 2012-2015 collective bargaining agreement and will incorporate into it whatever language results from that negotiation. By signing this MOU, without waiving or limiting any legal or contractual rights the parties may have:
A. This agreement does not preclude the negotiation of additional terms or compensation as part of the successor agreement.
B. This agreement will be incorporated into the successor agreement as an Appendix. APPENDIX E (Continued) PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR COMPENSATION MOU APPENDIX A Program / Department Annual Stipend* % Accounting (ACCT) $4,355.63 10% Administration of Justice (ADMJ) $10,889.08 25% Business (BUSI) $8,711.26 20% Child and Family Studies and Education (CFS, EDU, LGBT) $10,889.08 25% Computer Studies (COMP, COMS) $8,711.26 20% Counseling (COUN) $13,066.89 30% Digital Design and Graphics Technology (DDGT) $4,355.63 10% Emergency Medical Services (EMS, EMT) $17,422.52 40% English (ENGL) $17,422.52 40% ESL ...
OUTLIERS. Having established a large sample of potential ▇▇▇▇▇ break analogue candidates, we performed an initial visual inspection of the SDSS images for each source in order to identify any obvious outliers whose photometry was unsatisfactory for the purposes of the planned analysis. We also inspected all candidates again to confirm that their visible features confirmed them to be suitable candidates. Five sources (shown in Fig 2.3), which had passed the initial inspection, were identified in the second inspection and subsequently excluded from the analysis. One possible reason why these sources passed the initial selection process is that their SDSS-recorded sizes were in agreement with the compactness required of the candidate objects. However, it is likely that due to the SDSS spectroscopic fibre size of 3 arcseconds, only the brightest knots of star formation were catalogued. Hence, through visual inspection it was possible to determine that the actual size of these objects was larger, making them unsuitable analogue candidates. Another reason is likely to be that several of the outliers have very nearby neighbours or are undergoing merging processes. Since we initially selected based on the GALEX -determined location and due to this survey’s larger point spread function, confusion may have arisen between the sources and their neighbouring systems. Hence, while these objects fulfil the photometric and spectroscopic selection criteria, they are clearly unsuitable analogues to high-redshift ▇▇▇▇▇ break galaxies as they form part of larger systems, which in some cases appear to be undergoing merger-driven starburst events. It is therefore important to conduct a visual inspection to ensure such systems are excluded from further analysis.
OUTLIERS. Analysis result characterized as deviation from the other results in a study.