Historic Preservation Review Sample Clauses

Historic Preservation Review. If the facility that is being renovated with state funds is fifty (50) years old or older, then in accordance with Sections 267.061(2)(a) and (b), Florida Statutes, the Grantee must submit information about the grant project to the Division of Historical Resources, Bureau of Historic Preservation (Bureau), so that it may determine whether the project has historic significance. Should the Bureau deem the facility to have historic significance, grant funds may only be released after the Bureau notifies the Division, in writing, that the Grantee has satisfied the Bureau's requirements. If the facility is not deemed to be of historic significance, grant funds will be released to Grantee in accordance with Section 4 of this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (32)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Historic Preservation Review. The Grantee shall not commence construction nor allow commencement of construction until all Project plans have been approved by the Vermont Division for Historic Preservation. Grantee shall construct the Project in accordance with the approved project plans. Any conditions to avoid adverse impact on any historic or archeological resources shall be met, as set forth by letter to Grantee from the Division for Historic Preservation on behalf of the Vermont Advisory Council for Historic Preservation. Any changes to the Project plans must be approved in advance by the Division of Historic Preservation.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Historic Preservation Review. The City’s Office of Historic Preservation is charged with reviewing the design plans for all structure constructed or installed on City property. The design plans for all Network Huts and fencing surrounding such structures will be subject to the review of the Office of Historic Preservation in order to satisfy that the design is compatible with the historic designation of the zone or character of the neighborhood in which City Sites are located. The Tenant commits to implement design concepts, and the use of materials and camouflage, as necessary in order to achieve compliance with historic preservation review, including following the City of San Antonio Historic Design Guidelines. B Xxxxxxx Aquifer Recharge Zone. Tenant will be required to comply with all environmental protection measures associated with installations and construction of Network Huts at any City Sites located over the Xxxxxxx Aquifer Recharge Zone.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Historic Preservation Review. For each project being funded in whole or in part through a Grant Agreement, a historic preservation review must first be completed by the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) or MEA’s historic preservation expert. This review ensures that no historic property is “adversely affected” through building improvements, equipment installations, and related property modifications proposed for Projects funded wholly or in-part by a Program. Prior to starting construction, the Grantee shall ensure that MEA has received documentation from MHT or MEA’s historic preservation expert indicating that the Project will have no adverse effect on a historic property.
Sample 1Sample 2
Historic Preservation Review. For each project being funded in whole or in part through this Agreement, a historic preservation review must first be completed by the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) or MEA’s historical preservation expert. This review ensures that no historical property is “adversely affected” through this Program. Prior to starting construction, College shall assure that MEA has received documentation from MHT or MEA’s historical preservation expert indicating that the Project will have no adverse effect on a historical property.
Sample 1
Historic Preservation Review. The Grantee must submit the confirmation received from the Bureau of Historic Preservation regarding the historical significance of the property. Applies if structures are 50 years or older. (See Section 22) f) Submit a copy of the Grantee’s Florida Substitute Form W-9. (See Section 7)
Sample 1

Related to Historic Preservation Review

  • Historic Preservation Subrecipient agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR 800, Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this Contract. In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a Federal, State, or local historic property list.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. Attachment G GLO Contract No. 19-097-041-B662 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Compliance Reviews The Department may conduct a compliance review of the Contractor’s security procedures before and during the Contract term to protect Confidential Information.

  • Development cooperation 1. The Parties recognise that development cooperation is a crucial element of their Partnership and an essential factor in the realisation of the objectives of this Agreement as laid down in Article 1. This cooperation can take financial and non-financial forms.

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.