Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance Sample Clauses

Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance a. The Board shall not dismiss an employee except where the Board has received three (3) consecutive reports written by not fewer than two (2) evaluators indicating less than satisfactory performance. The three (3) reports shall be issued in a period of not less than ten (10) teaching months and not more than twenty
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. An employee on a continuing contract shall not be dismissed for less than satisfactory performance unless:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. The following applies with respect to teachers who are not placed on a probationary appointment.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board may dismiss a teacher under this article if:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. (a) The test of just and reasonable cause for dismissal shall be a test of suitability of the employee for continued employment to the position appointed.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board shall not dismiss a teacher other than a teacher-teaching-on-call on the basis of “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article C.22 (Teacher Evaluation) of this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. The test of just and reasonable cause for dismissal will be a test of suitability of the teacher for continued employment to the position appointed. If the Society intends to dismiss a teacher pursuant to this article, the teacher and the appropriate union representative will be provided with written notification prior to such action. The decision to dismiss a teacher for less than satisfactory performance will be based on a minimum of three less than satisfactory reports prepared in accordance with this article. The reports will be prepared by at least two different evaluators. Where a teacher is dismissed pursuant to this article, any salary that has accrued and is scheduled to be paid during the following summer vacation period will be paid to the teacher. Disputes resulting from dismissal under this article will be subject to Step 3 of the grievance procedure. If the matter is not resolved at Step 3, the dispute may be referred to arbitration under Article 11 of this agreement. In the event that the Arbitrator determines that the evaluation was not conducted honestly and in good faith, the Arbitrator may grant as a remedy in substitution for reinstatement to the teacher a severance amount based on applicable judicial guidelines.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. 1. The Board shall not dismiss a teacher other than a Teacher Teaching on Call (TTOC) on the basis of “less than satisfactory” performance of teaching duties except where the board has received at least three (3) consecutive reports pursuant to Article C.22 (Teacher Evaluation) of this agreement indicating that the learning situation in the class or classes of the teacher is less than satisfactory.
Sample 1Sample 2
Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance. (a) The test of just and reasonable cause for dismissal based on less than satisfactory evaluation reports shall include a consideration of the required competency levels for teachers at Southpointe Academy.
Sample 1

Related to Dismissal for Less Than Satisfactory Performance

  • Satisfactory Performance Subject to the provisions of the Payment Security Requirements Section above, the Payment Security will be returned within ninety (90) days following the expiration of the Term of this Agreement, subject to the satisfactory performance by Company of all terms, conditions, and covenants contained herein.

  • Unsatisfactory Performance All work performed by the Contractor is expected to be done in the most expeditious and professional manner as specified in Section 5 of this document, while also complying with the workmanlike standard clause contained at Section 5.4.1.

  • Continuing Contract Performance Pending final resolution of a Claim including litigation, unless otherwise agreed in writing the Contractor shall proceed diligently with performance of the Contract and the Owner shall continue to make payments in accordance with the Contract Documents.

  • Excuse for Nonperformance or Delayed Performance Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, Contractor/Vendor shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure by Contractor/Vendor to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if Contractor/Vendor has notified the Commission or designee within 15 days after the cause of the delay and the failure arises out of causes such as: acts of God; acts of the public enemy; acts of the State and any other governmental entity in its sovereign or contractual capacity; fires; floods; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; strikes or other labor disputes; freight embargoes; or unusually severe weather. If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor to perform or to make progress, and if such failure arises out of causes similar to those set forth above, Contractor/Vendor shall not be deemed to be in default, unless the services to be furnished by the subcontractor were reasonably obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit Contractor to meet the contract requirements. Upon request of Contractor, the Commission or designee shall ascertain the facts and extent of such failure, and, if such officer determines that any failure to perform was occasioned by any one or more of the excusable causes, and that, but for the excusable cause, Contractor’s progress and performance would have met the terms of the contract, the delivery schedule shall be revised accordingly, subject to the rights of the State under the clause entitled (in fixed-price contracts, “Termination for Convenience,” in cost-reimbursement contracts, “Termination”). (As used in this Paragraph of this clause, the term “subcontractor” means subcontractor at any tier).

  • Excused Performance 6.1 Notwithstanding the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event, in which case Clause 17 will govern, BT will not be liable for any failure or delay to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement (including any of its obligations to meet any Service Levels) to the extent that BT’s failure or delay in performing arises as a result of:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.