Corr Sample Clauses

Corr. 1). Depending on the time available, this usually takes between two and four months. This first draft is then circulated to the workshop participants as well as those government representatives and national experts that were invited but not able to attend. This first consultation round is meant to ensure that all the necessary substantive details as well as actions for the species are reflected as discussed at the workshop. Following the feedback from the workshop participants, the lead compiler prepares a new draft which is submitted to the AEWA Technical Committee for comments by the Secretariat. A revised draft is then again prepared by the lead compiler and submitted by the Secretariat to all Focal Points and Contact Points in the relevant range states for official government consultation. The timeframe for the official consultation is ideally three months. Within the framework of the official consultation the Focal Points and Contact Points are expected to circulate the draft to all relevant national bodies and stakeholders for comments in accordance with their respective established national procedures and to submit the consolidated national comments to the Secretariat by the given deadline. If no comments are submitted by the deadline, the Secretariat assumes that range states are in agreement with the Plan. Possible extensions of the deadline for submitting national comments can be requested of the Secretariat. The Secretariat is responsible for the overall final editing (both language and layout) of the draft plan. In order to avoid unnecessary delays throughout the drafting process, this task is usually carried out towards the end of the consultation process.

Corr. 1), in order to make future Action and Management Plans more streamlined and to accommodate for multi-species Action and Management plans as well as to make AEWA Plans more implementable, accessible and practical for policy-makers and implementing agencies. As such and following the subsequent request of the 6th Session of the Meeting of the Parties to AEWA in November 2015 (Resolution 6.8), the AEWA Technical Committee has undertaken a revision of the format for AEWA Action Plans – including improved guidance for the preparation and consultation of such Plans - so that the same format now caters for all species Plans envisaged to be developed and adopted under the Agreement (International Single Species as well as Multi-Species Action and Management Plans). It should be noted that the suggested format in section A of the document is final, however, the guidance included in section B of the document will still be further developed and completed by the Technical Committee before submission to the Meeting of the Parties in 2018. It is foreseen that the new and revised AEWA International Single Species Action and Management Plans which are being developed during this triennium (2016-2018) to be submitted for approval by the 7th Session of the Meeting of the AEWA Parties in 2018, will all follow this revised format. Action Requested from the Standing Committee The Standing Committee is requested to review the revised format for AEWA International Action, Management and Multi-Species Plans as proposed by the Technical Committee and to approve it for further use, on an interim basis subject to final approval by Meeting of the Parties. REVISED FORMAT AND GUIDELINES FOR AEWA INTERNATIONAL SPECIES ACTION AND MANAGEMENT PLANS Prepared by: Wetlands International With contributions from: BirdLife International, Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Rubicon Foundation, Wetlands International Waterbird Harvest Specialist Group For the Secretariat of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds January 2017 Introduction to the Revised AEWA International Action and Management Plan Format AEWA International Species Action and Management Plans remain one of most vital and practical tools under the Agreement for the coordinated international conservation and sustainable use of migratory waterbirds. These Plans represent the quintessence of AEWA: cooperation across flyways for a common defined goal. Although good progress has been made with regard to the de...

Corr. CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation, formerly known as Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation, and its successors and assigns. CORR Change of Control. A transaction in which any “person” or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), directly or indirectly, of a sufficient number of shares of all classes of stock then outstanding of CORR ordinarily entitled to vote in the election of directors, empowering such “person” or “group” to elect a majority of the Board of Directors of CORR, who did not have such power before such transaction.

Corr. CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation, formerly known as Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation, and its successors and assigns.

Corr. 1) regarding its activities since MOP6.

Corr. Author has obtained all the necessary permissions for the use in the Abstract of the materials, the copyright holder (s) of which his does not own the copyright.

Corr. Author on behalf of all coauthors has the right to:

Corr. Author fully representing all coauthors is committed to:

Corr. 1). The Secretariat will introduce the proposed revised list of IITs for 2012-2015/2016 (Doc. AEWA/MOP5 DR3 Corr.1) and the Meeting will be invited to consider and adopt the draft resolution.