Blocking. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict either Party from offering to its end user customers the ability to block the completion of information service traffic.
Blocking. Employees exercising banking rights under 'G' 10.03.2 and 'G' 10.03.3 above may block Statutory Holiday lieu days in groups of five (5) days or less subject to staffing requirements as determined by the Employer and wherever possible will be tied to the employee's regular days off or annual vacation.
Blocking o To ensure the equal and fair use of the Shared Assets Area capacity by its parent companies, the following car classification requirements will govern: - Each parent company will be required to block inbound trains for the Shared Assets Areas. Each parent will make the number of blocks called for in the split-date Operating Plan. Failure to comply with inbound blocking requirements and execute appropriate setoffs (unless otherwise directed by Shared Assets management) within the Shared Assets Area will result in an assessment of $50.00 per loaded or empty car. - Management of the Shared Assets Areas will be required to block outbound trains. Parent companies will receive the number of blocks at each Shared Assets Area terminal that is called for in the split-date Operating Plan. - Changes to the number of blocks made by or delivered to a Shared Asset terminal may be made only by mutual consent of all three parties. - Parent companies, except by joint agreement, may not compel the Shared Assets Areas management to make a greater number of blocks at any terminal, beyond the number of called for in the split-date Operating Plan. - Each parent may change the definition of its own specific blocks originating at a Shared Assets Area terminal. Hours of Service and Recrews o Train crews on parent trains approaching a Shared Assets Area must have sufficient time to terminate in or exit the Shared Assets Areas before hours-of-service laws require them to rest. Sufficient time is considered the trains scheduled elapsed time to terminate in or pass through the Shared Assets Area. The Shared Assets Areas management may grant an exception if the train can make it to its destination without undue disruption.
Blocking. Provide blocking in walls at all locations that require additional wall support, such as for fire extinguishers, grab bars, mirrors, lavatories, toilet accessories, finish hardware, etc. In addition, one row of 2x6 continuous wood blocking shall be required for the perimeter wall unit fixtures, installed at 72” above finished floor to top of blocking.
Blocking. 7.1 Airwallet ApS's blocking of Airwallet Airwallet ApS is entitled, without notice, to block your access to use the Airwallet for security reasons and / or suspected unauthorized use, including if: · the card (s) or account associated with the Airwallet is closed or blocked · the conditions for Airwallet are not met and this entails a risk to security or to unauthorized use. · The mobile number associated with Airwallet has been abused or allegedly abused. · Airwallet has been abused or allegedly abused by third parties. In addition, we can block access to Airwallet without notice if the Airwallet user is wholly or partly covered by sanctions from the Danish authorities, the EU or the UN, cf. the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' overview of sanctions, or the like (e.g. US authorities such as Office of Foreign Assets Control). Furthermore, we can block access to Airwallet without notice if the Airwallet user does not provide Airwallet ApS with the information that Airwallet ApS is required to obtain from the Airwallet user under the law, for example under the Money Laundering Act (Hvidvaskloven) or the Tax Control Act (Skattekontrolloven). When we block access to Airwallet, we will notify you in advance of the reason and date and time of the block. If a pre-notice will damage the security, we will notify you immediately after the blocking.
Blocking. 2. Nailers.
Blocking. The dissimilation cases (Poser 1993:137, XxXxxxxx 2007) do not pose any issue for the analysis. The dissimilation is between two adjacent root-nodes in the assimilation. In our model, it means it can be targeted by a markedness constraint that refers to the precedence relation. As in the case for Basque, I postulate a generic markedness constraint that targets the banned sequence of adjacent root nodes. Also notice that the previous analysis is unaffected by the introduction of this constraint because it can only be violated for /sn/ sequences, and in the examples above that was never the case. Derived sibilants do not undergo, but trigger harmony. Let us consider the two cases separately. Recall that in Chumash, harmony is from right-to-left. In the tableau below, the [+anterior] sibilant would normally induce regressive assimilation of all preceding sibilants. However, this requirement conflicts with the effect of local assimilation, which prefers candidates with the [−anterior] sibilant. ERC Input Winner Loser *sn ID-IO(+sib) RELATE-[+sib] ID-[+sib](ant) ALIGN([+sib], R) ID-IO(+sib-head) ID-IO(-ant) ID-IO(+ant) 8 sn…s ʃn…s sxn…(s)x W L L X X 9 sn…s ʃn…s (ʃ)xn…ʃx W L L W X X Derived sibilants, instead, trigger harmony. This is because in this case, local assimilation is not in conflict with long-distance agreement, in fact, it feeds it. Since there is no longer a conflict to be resolved, the optimal candidate is the one that displays both local and long-distance agreement. ERC Input Winner Loser *sn ID-IO(+sib) RELATE-[+sib] ID-[+sib](ant) ALIGN([+sib], R) ID-IO(+sib-head) ID-IO(-ant) ID-IO(+ant)
Blocking. The Interconnection of all networks will be based upon accepted industry/national guidelines for transmission standards and traffic blocking criteria. 3.2.1
Blocking freezing and closing of accounts:
Blocking. Manual and automatic blocking of IP's (Blacklisting and whitelisting included).
