Supervisor’s recommendation Sample Clauses

Supervisor’s recommendation. The immediate supervisor shall provide a proposed promotion recommendation to the faculty member. After receipt of a proposed negative recommendation, the faculty member shall be given the opportunity to meet with the immediate supervisor. The final recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member. The faculty member may submit a written response to the Vice President regarding the immediate supervisor’s recommendation. This response becomes part of the applicant’s promotion file.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Supervisor’s recommendation. If the probationary employee has not been previously removed from probation, the evaluator shall submit a written report to the Superintendent not later than May 1. The written report shall indicate the employee's performance during the probationary period and contain a recommended course of action to be taken by the Superintendent. The probationary employee shall be given a copy of the report.
Supervisor’s recommendation. The immediate supervisor shall provide the faculty member a written assessment in accordance with Article 22. , Section D, In addition, the immediate supervisor and subsequently shall provide a proposed tenure recommendation to the faculty member. supervising Vice President. After receipt of a proposed negative recommendation, the faculty member shall be given the opportunity to meet with the immediate supervisor. The final recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member. The recommendation of the immediate supervisor shall be sent to the faculty member in accordance with Article 5, Section A. The faculty member may submit a written response to the Vice President regarding the immediate supervisor’s recommendation. This response becomes part of the applicant’s tenure file. The faculty member is entitled to attach comments to the recommendation.
Supervisor’s recommendation. The above named officer is / is not recommended for ORSP. I certify that his/her performance is satisfactory and that he/she is not in an internship or initial residency program. (Signature) (Printed Name) DATE The above named officer is / is not recommended for ORSP payment. (Signature) (Printed Name) DATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Commissioned Corps Privacy Act Statement for Public Health Service Commissioned Corps "Optometrist Retention Special Pay (ORSP) Agreement Form PHS-7040 (08/2004) Authority: This statement is provided pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). Our authority to collect this information is 42 U.S.C. 202 et seq. and Executive Order 9397, "Numbering System for Federal Accounts Relating to Individual Persons." Principal Purpose: This information is used by the Department of Health and Human Services to record a Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps officer’s eligibility to receive ORSP. If you are selected for award of ORSP, the information collected will be used for issuance of personnel orders to authorize payment. These records, or information therefrom, may also be provided to other Federal Agencies to which Corps optometry officers are assigned. The information also may be used for study purposes and/or collection of statistical data for reports to other Federal Agencies and the Congress. It may also be used for other lawful purposes including collection of a debt owed the Federal Government, law enforcement, and litigation. Routine Uses: Information may be provided to the Internal Revenue Service to resolve matters relating to an individual’s tax withholding; to the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board to establish eligibility for contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan for Uniformed Service personnel; and to the Department of Justice or State and local governments when a question of conflicting interest is raised concerning a member’s eligibility for and payment of bonuses. Information Regarding Disclosure of Your Social Security Number (SSN): Under Executive Order 9397, Agencies are required to use the SSN as a means of identifying individuals in Agency personnel information systems. Solicitation of your SSN is authorized by this order so that Agencies, by being able to identify you, can ensure that the data furnished is accurately recorded for each employee in the personnel system. It will be used for this purpose only.

Related to Supervisor’s recommendation

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) The Company hereby consents to the Offer and represents, as of the date of this Agreement, that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, has unanimously made the Company Board Recommendation. Subject in each case to Section 6.1(b), the Company hereby consents to the inclusion of a description of the Company Board Recommendation in the Offer Documents and, during the Pre-Closing Period, neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) (A) fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), or publicly propose to fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), the Company Board Recommendation or (B) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, recommend, endorse or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 when disseminated to the Company’s stockholders (any action described in clause (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Company Adverse Change Recommendation”), (iii) publicly make any recommendation in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer (other than the Offer) other than a recommendation against such offer or (iv) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable, or allow the Company to execute or enter into any Contract (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal requiring, or reasonably expected to cause, the Company to abandon, terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or that would otherwise materially impede, interfere with or be inconsistent with, the Transactions.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The literature review (see Appendix C) indicates a range of buffer width recommendations for protecting the shade function. Based on the XXXXX curve reported in this section of the report, approximately 1 SPTH (estimated at 61 meters or 200 ft) will provide nearly 100 percent effectiveness of the buffer to protect the intertidal from desiccation, elevated temperatures, and other shade-related functions. Of course, in nonforested community types (e.g., prairie and grasslands) the shade function from overstory trees may be unattainable. To maximize the buffer’s effectiveness to provide the shade function, the following actions are recommended: • Avoid disturbance to native vegetation in riparian areas, especially nearer the water’s edge. • Retain, restore, and enhance mature trees and a multi-layered canopy and understory of native vegetation at sites that support these types of plant communities. • Ensure that riparian areas can be maintained in mature, native vegetation through time. • Prevent modifications to banks and bluffs (e.g., armoring) that could disrupt natural processes (such as soil creep, development of backshore and overhanging vegetation, recruitment of wood and other organic matter to riparian area including beaches and banks.) • Prohibit cutting and topping of trees and avoid “limbing” (selective branch cutting to enhance views) of trees for view corridors and other purposes within buffers.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

  • Recommendations This matter has been reviewed and approved by the Medical School Conflict of Interest Board. In light of this disclosure and our finding that the Agreement was negotiated in conformance with standard University practices, I recommend that the Board of Regents approve the University’s entering into this Agreement with The Hope Foundation. Respectfully submitted, X. Xxxx Xx

  • No Government Recommendation or Approval The Subscriber understands that no federal or state agency has passed upon or made any recommendation or endorsement of the offering of the Shares.

  • Recommendation The Sheriff recommends approval of the Board Order. The County Administrator concurs with the recommendation of the Sheriff. Should the Board of Commissioners concur with their recommendations, approval of the Board Order will implement that action. Respectfully submitted, /s/ XXXXX XXXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx County Administrator

  • Removal from any Boards and Positions Upon Executive’s termination of employment for any reason under this Agreement, Executive shall be deemed to resign (i) if a member, from the Board and the board of directors of any Affiliate and any other board to which Executive has been appointed or nominated by or on behalf of the Company or an Affiliate, (ii) from each position with the Company and any Affiliate, including as an officer of the Company or an Affiliate and (iii) as a fiduciary of any employee benefit plan of the Company and any Affiliate.

  • Authority Relative to this Agreement; Recommendation The Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by the Board and no other corporate proceedings on the part of the Company are necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby except, if required by law, the approval and adoption of this Agreement and the Merger by the holders of the outstanding Shares. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by the Company and constitutes a valid, legal and binding agreement of the Company enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally, and except as the availability of equitable remedies may be limited by the application of general principles of equity (regardless of whether such equitable principle is applied in a proceeding at law or in equity). The Board has duly and validly approved, and taken all corporate actions required to be taken by the Board (including but not limited to all actions the Board reasonably believes to be required to render the provisions of Title 3, Subtitles 2, 6 and 7 of the MGCL, "Special Voting Requirements" and "Voting Rights of Certain Control Shares", respectively, inapplicable to Parent and Acquisition) for the consummation of, the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Offer and the acquisition of the Shares pursuant thereto, the Preferred Stock Issuance and the Merger.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.