STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS Sample Clauses

STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. ● See table above for Goal 1-4
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. Goal #1: Curriculum & Instruction
Sample 1Sample 2
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS a. Analysis of online curriculum and teacher resources via a Survey of Enacted Curriculum.
Sample 1Sample 2
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS a) Goal 1 - Recruit and retain certified teachers and provide incentives for them to stay. Recruiting at job fairs, posting on Indeed, intensive interview process, and mentoring new staff relationships from the initial hire. Professional development will last 9 days before the start of school with curriculum trainers. Professional development surveys, first year reflection journal, sign in sheets at all staff and committee meetings. Data meetings with all teaching staff twice a month to build our capacity level while ensuring mission and vision aligned to the Academy's goals.
Sample 1
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. A) Strategy 1: Instructional Practices (Goal 1 and 2) Through our focus on Instructional Practices, through curriculum training, bi- monthly trainings and increased accountability, we will create a systemic and comprehensive approach to instructional practice allowing teachers to collaborate and calibrate their instructional efforts for the benefit of student learning and improvement of instructional practice during bi-monthly PLC meetings. This effort will include the adaptation of ELA and math curricula including common benchmark assessments aligned to the Michigan State Common Core Standards.
Sample 1
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. 36 Month Goal 18-Month Benchmarks Strategies to Meet Goals and Benchmarks Goal 1 – Reading: There will be a 12% aggregate increase in the percentage of students identified as grade level proficient in Reading as measured by M-STEP (Grades 3-6) by June 30, 2021 Benchmarks aligned to Goal 1 - Reading: • Heggerty phonemic awareness process fully implemented in all K-3 classrooms, happening on a consistent basis • Workshop model components evident in every classroom where reading is taught • Four of the Literacy Essentials will be fully implemented within the workshop model • Model in place where Certified Teachers are serving kids furthest from benchmark • 4% aggregate increase in the percentage of students grade level proficient as measured by M-STEP (Grades 3-6) The strategies will be used interchangeably to support meeting the benchmarks and goals • Differentiated job embedded professional learning opportunities for teachers • Professional learning opportunities for support staff and academic interventionists • Developing and implementing a research based MTSS model of academic intervention where certified staff are teaching the students furthest from benchmark Goal 2 – Math: There will be a 9% aggregate increase in the percentage of students identified as grade level proficient in Math as measured by M-STEP (Grades 3-6) by June 30, 2021 Benchmarks aligned to Goal 2 - Mathematics: • Concrete and/or pictorial representation of every math standard/concept will be evident in each classroom, through the use of manipulatives when required • Eureka math problem sets are evident every day in every classroom where math is taught • Adopted curriculum is taught with fidelity—all units are taught in all classrooms, scope and sequence is consistent across classrooms and grade levels • Data meetings around math assessments are fully implemented – occurring at the middle and end of each module to check for progress/mastery • 3% aggregate increase in the percentage of students grade level proficient as measured by M-STEP (Grades 3-6) The strategies will be used interchangeably to support meeting the benchmarks and goals • Differentiated job embedded professional learning opportunities for teachers • Professional learning opportunities for support staff and academic interventionists • Developing and implementing a research based MTSS model of academic intervention where certified staff are teaching the students furthest from benchmark
Sample 1
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. Strategies for Goal 1: Teacher Professional Development in Guided Reading by August 31, 2018.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS o Strategies for Goal 1: Improving student achievement in ELA and Mathematics o Strategies for Goal 2: Improving student attendance o Strategies for Goal 3: Fully implementing ANet Data Process with fidelity o Strategies for Goal 4:
Sample 1
STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS. Goal #1: Curriculum & Instruction 100% of all instructional staff will be trained on the Curriculum Crafter Curriculum (District curriculum). All staff will deliver curriculum with efficacy and fidelity. Strategy 1: Create a partnership with the Curriculum Crafter PD (Professional Development) team. Create a calendar for district and embedded local school level training from the Curriculum Crafter team to develop clear instructional goals using the Curriculum Crafter Curriculum. Strategy 2: Create a partnership with the MI Excel Statewide field team to install the Blueprint to have a clear articulated curriculum that is consistently taught in the classroom with fidelity. Goal #2: School Culture & Climate A PBIS (Positive Behavior, Intervention and Support) System will be adopted and implemented school-wide. 100% of all instructional and supporting staff will be trained on identified PBIS system and implement with efficacy and fidelity. Discipline issues will be reduced by 10% as measured by suspensions reported in the Academy’s Pupil Accounting system (Mi-Star, Educators handbook & PowerSchool) discipline data platform.
Sample 1

Related to STRATEGIES TO MEET PARTNERSHIP GOALS AND BENCHMARKS

  • Non-Qualifying Operations 1. A good shall not be considered to be an originating good merely by reason of:

  • Skills and Abilities (i) Ability to communicate effectively both verbally and in writing.

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Targets a) Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Objectives The objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.