Site Reviews Sample Clauses

Site Reviews. 2.9.10.1. In addition to the requirements of this Contract, the Contractor shall allow the Department or its designee to conduct site reviews at least annually, or more frequently as determined by the Department.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Site Reviews. 2.6.4.2.1. The Department may conduct Site Reviews of the Contractor’s, Subcontractors’ or Participating Providers’ locations on an annual basis or more frequently if the Department determines more frequent reviews to be necessary in its sole discretion. The Department will conduct these Site Reviews for the purpose of determining compliance by the Contractor with applicable Department regulations and the requirements of this Contract. In the event that right of access is requested under this section, the Contractor and/or its Subcontractors or Participating Providers shall, provide and make available staff to assist in the audit or inspection effort. They shall provide adequate space on the premises to reasonably accommodate Department, state or federal personnel conducting the audit or inspection effort. All inspections or audits shall be conducted in a manner that will not unduly interfere with the performance of the Contractor's, Subcontractor's or Participating Providers’ provision of care.
Site Reviews. DSHS reserves the right to conduct reviews of the service location sites at regular intervals. The Contractor agrees to make available to DSHS all client files, billing documentation, and staff information as requested by DSHS.
Site Reviews. The Department may conduct Site Reviews of the Contractor’s, Subcontractors’ or Participating Providers’ locations on an annual basis or more frequently if the Department determines more frequent reviews to be necessary in its sole discretion. The Department will conduct these Site Reviews for the purpose of determining compliance by the Contractor with applicable Department regulations and the requirements of this Contract. In the event that right of access is requested under this section, the Contractor and/or its Subcontractors or Participating Providers shall, provide and make available staff to assist in the audit or inspection effort. They shall provide adequate space on the premises to reasonably accommodate Department, state or federal personnel conducting the audit or inspection effort. All inspections or audits shall be conducted in a manner that will not unduly interfere with the performance of the Contractor's, Subcontractor's or Participating Providers’ provision of care. An emergency or unannounced review may be required in instances where Member safety, quality of medical care, potential fraud or financial viability is at risk. The Department may determine when an emergency review is required in its sole discretion. For non-emergency Site Reviews, the Contractor shall participate in the preview of the monitoring instrument to be used as part of the assessment and shall be contacted for mutually agreed upon dates for a Site Review. Final notice of the Site Review schedule and a copy of the monitoring instrument will be mailed to the Contractor at least three
Site Reviews. During the term of this Agreement, DealerTrack also shall allow Lender and its external auditors on Lender's behalf to perform periodic on-site reviews of DealerTrack's physical site as Lender deems reasonably appropriate for the purpose of determining DealerTrack's compliance with
Site Reviews. Upon execution of this Agreement, but in no event later than within six (6) months of execution of this Agreement and annually thereafter, Contractor shall perform security site reviews of specific County security locations, as specified below, and shall provide County with a written report of said security assessments, to include specific findings and recommendations regarding security officer deployment and services, using standard industry practices. Site reviews shall be performed by qualified Contractor senior management personnel, at the following County sites/locations: • Court Security locations, including Hall of Justice, Northern Courts, Central Courts, Traffic Court and the Youth Services CenterSan Mateo Medical Center, including existing hospital key security sites (PES, ER, lobbies and service entrances) • San Xxxxxx Airport facilities and grounds • Coyote Point Marina facilities and docks • Human Services Agency service locations served under this Agreement. Site reviews at the San Mateo Medical Center must conform to State standards for hospitals. In compliance with AB 1083, the security site review and security plan must be updated annually.

Related to Site Reviews

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Site Visits ‌ The Commission may visit the School at any time and may, at its discretion, conduct site visits and monitoring. When appropriate, the Commission shall make reasonable efforts to provide notice of visits. Such site visits may include any activities reasonably related to fulfillment of the Commission’s oversight responsibilities including, but not limited to, inspection of the facilities; audit of financial books and records; inspection of records maintained by the School; interviews and observations of the principal, staff, school families, staff of an affiliated nonprofit or educational service provider and community members; and observation of classroom instruction.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Environmental Review (a) Buyer shall have the right to conduct or cause a consultant (“Buyer’s Environmental Consultant”) to conduct an environmental review of the Assets and Seller’s records pertaining to the Assets (as set forth in Section 3.01) prior to the expiration of the Examination Period (“Buyer’s Environmental Review”). The cost and expense of Buyer’s Environmental Review, if any, shall be borne solely by Buyer. The scope of work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review shall not include any intrusive test or procedure without the prior written consent of Seller. Buyer shall (and shall cause Buyer’s Environmental Consultant to): (i) consult with Seller before conducting any work comprising Buyer’s Environmental Review, (ii) perform all such work in a safe and workmanlike manner and so as to not unreasonably interfere with Seller’s operations and (iii) comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any Third Party consents and otherwise cooperate with Buyer in conducting Buyer’s Environmental Review and any activities related thereto. Seller shall have the right to have a representative or representatives accompany Buyer and Buyer’s Environmental Consultant at all times during Buyer’s Environmental Review. With respect to any samples taken in connection with Buyer’s Environmental Review, Buyer shall take split samples, providing one of each such sample, properly labeled and identified, to Seller. The Parties shall execute a “common undertaking” letter regarding the confidentiality for the Environmental Review where appropriate. Buyer hereby agrees to release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Seller from and against all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, causes of action and judgments of any kind or character (INCLUDING THOSE RESULTING FROM SELLER’S SOLE, JOINT, COMPARATIVE OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY) to the extent arising out of Buyer’s Environmental Review. Buyer hereby covenants and agrees that it will have at least $2,000,000 of general liability insurance to cover its indemnification hereunder prior to the commencement of the Environmental Review.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Vendor must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.