Repeat Infringer Policy. Publisher may terminate a user’s access to the Publisher’s App(s) if, under appropriate circumstances, the user is determined to be a repeat infringer.
Repeat Infringer Policy. Current’s intellectual property policy is to (i) remove or disable access to material that Current believes in good faith or upon notice from an intellectual property owner or his or her agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Service; (ii) remove any User Content uploaded to the Service by “repeat infringers”; and
Repeat Infringer Policy. 4SPACES LTD’s intellectual property policy is to (i) remove or disable access, to the extent of 4SPACES LTD’s ability and control, material that 4SPACES LTD believes in good faith, upon notice from an intellectual property owner or their agent, is infringing the intellectual property of a third party by being made available through the Services, and (ii) remove or disable access to any User Content posted to or made available through the Services by “repeat infringers.” 4SPACES LTD considers a “repeat infringer” to be any user that has uploaded User Content to or through the Services and for whom 4SPACES LTD has received more than two takedown notices compliant with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) with respect to such User Content. 4SPACES LTD has discretion, however, to terminate the account of any user, to the extent 4SPACES LTD has such ability, after receipt of a single notification of claimed infringement or upon 4SPACES LTD’s own determination. Note, however, that 4SPACES LTD may not have an ongoing relationship with Uniqorn App Users following the download of the Application to a mobile device that enables 4SPACES LTD to block a user from uploading a Uniqorn Video to a Third Party Site.
Repeat Infringer Policy. The class plaintiffs briefly argue that YouTube failed to comply with the requirements of § 512(i), which conditions safe harbor eligibility on the service provider having "adopted and reasonably implemented . . . a policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscribers and account holders of the service provider's system or network who are repeat infringers." 17 U.S.C. § 512(i)(1)(A). Specifically, the class plaintiffs allege that YouTube "deliberately set up its identification tools to try to avoid identifying infringements of class plaintiffs' works." This allegation rests primarily on the assertion that YouTube permitted only designated "partners" to gain access to content identification tools by which YouTube would conduct network searches and identify infringing material.14
Repeat Infringer Policy. In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) and other applicable law, Mother has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at our discretion, account holders who are deemed to be repeat infringers. We also may, at our discretion, limit access to our Services and terminate the accounts of any users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
Repeat Infringer Policy. In accordance with the Copyright Act and other applicable law (as may be amended from time to time), Piiva has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at Piiva's sole discretion, users who are deemed to be repeat infringers. Piiva may also at its sole discretion limit access to the Service and/or terminate the memberships of any users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
Repeat Infringer Policy. IAC may terminate a user's access to the “Screen Recorder with Audio” App(s) if, under appropriate circumstances, the user is determined to be a repeat infringer.
Repeat Infringer Policy. In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and other applicable law, the Company has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at the Company's sole discretion, the memberships of members who are deemed to be repeat infringers. The Company may also at its sole discretion limit access to the Site and/or terminate the memberships of any Users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
Repeat Infringer Policy. We will terminate an account holder’s access to the Services if that user is determined by Plauzzable to be a “repeat infringer” of copyrighted works on the service – under our policy, a user will be considered a repeat infringer if they accrue three copyright strikes. Furthermore, we may in appropriate cases and at our sole discretion, limit access to the Services and/or terminate the accounts of any users who blatantly and egregiously infringe the intellectual property rights of others, whether or not repeat infringement has occurred. Account holders generally earn a strike when Plauzzable receives a complete notification of infringement and does not receive a complete counter-notification regarding the alleged infringement or a retraction of the notification. Strikes are not permanent, but rather are associated with an account for enough time for Plauzzable to determine whether the account holder is engaging in repeated, actual infringement such that termination is necessary under this Policy. When determining whether account holders are repeat infringers under this policy, we take into consideration complete notifications of claimed infringement from rights holders, complete counter-notifications from account holders, retractions from rights holders, and other relevant factors and circumstances, such as whether the claimant is frivolous or vexatious. Plauzzable may also ask the complainant and/or account holder for more information where we think it is necessary to fairly apply our Repeat Infringer Policy. If a relevant court rules that an account holder is an “infringer” or “repeat infringer” on Plauzzable, we will take that ruling as conclusive under our Repeat Infringer Policy. To provide judicial determinations showing that an account holder is an infringer, or a repeat infringer, on the Services, please forward it to our Designated Copyright Agent (see below) with “court ruling regarding infringer/repeat infringer” in the subject line. Plauzzable personnel will review the submission and may contact the complainant and/or account holder to verify the court ruling and understand its scope.
Repeat Infringer Policy. Reflectivv has adopted a policy of terminating, in appropriate circumstances and at Reflectivv's sole discretion, Users who are deemed to be repeat infringers. Reflectivv may also at its sole discretion limit access to the Service and/or terminate the Accounts of any Users who infringe any intellectual property rights of others, whether or not there is any repeat infringement.
