Manufacturing Patents Sample Clauses

Manufacturing Patents. [**] shall file all patent applications with the appropriate patent authorities worldwide for any Arising IP (other than [**]) that claim the [**] Licensed Antibody or Licensed Product (“Arising Manufacturing Patent”) [**]. [**] shall consult with [**] through the JIPC on such Arising Manufacturing Patents, and shall consider in good faith [**] reasonable comments with respect to such Arising Manufacturing Patents.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Manufacturing Patents. All provisions relating to Manufacturing Patents shall be governed by the Manufacturing Services Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Manufacturing Patents. [ *** ] [ *** ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended. SUPPLY AGREEMENT
Sample 1
Manufacturing Patents. Restoragen shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to file, prosecute and maintain all patent applications and patents included in the Manufacturing Patents. Restoragen shall provide Amylin with an opportunity to review and discuss with Restoragen prosecution strategy and to consult with Restoragen on the content of such patent filings, and Restoragen shall consider in good faith Amylin’s reasonable suggestions regarding such patent filings. Restoragen shall be responsible for all costs, fees and expenses incurred from and after the Closing in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of the patent applications and patents included in the Manufacturing Patents. Restoragen agrees to notify Amylin in writing in a timely manner if it does not desire to support the continued prosecution or appeals or maintenance of any of the patent applications and patents included in the Manufacturing Patents.
Sample 1
Manufacturing Patents. With respect to any infringement of any patent included in the Manufacturing Patents, Restoragen shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to bring and control any action or proceeding with respect to such infringement at its own expense and by counsel of its own choice, and Amylin shall have the right, at its own expense, to be represented in any such action by counsel of its own choice. If Restoragen fails to bring an action or proceeding within (A) sixty (60) days following the notice of alleged infringement or (B) ten (10) days before the time limit, if any, set forth in the applicable laws and regulations for the filing of such actions, whichever comes first, Amylin shall have the right to bring and control any action or proceeding with respect to such infringement at its own expense and by counsel of its own choice, and Restoragen shall have the right, at its own expense, to be represented in any such action by counsel of its own choice.
Sample 1
Manufacturing Patents. Seller shall have the first right, responsibility and discretion to Prosecute and Maintain the Manufacturing Patents at its sole cost and expense. If Seller determines to abandon or not to Prosecute and Maintain any Manufacturing Patent in any country or jurisdiction, then Seller will provide Purchaser with written notice promptly after any such determination to allow Purchaser a reasonable period of time to determine, on a country-by-country basis in its sole discretion, its interest in Prosecuting and Maintaining such Manufacturing Patent (which notice by Seller will be given at least [**] days prior to the abandonment of Seller’s Prosecution and Maintenance of such Manufacturing Patent by Seller). If Purchaser provides written notice to Seller expressing its interest in maintaining such Manufacturing Patent then, with respect to such Manufacturing Patent in such country, (i) Purchaser may, in its sole discretion and at Purchaser’s cost and expense, Prosecute and Maintain or abandon such Manufacturing Patent; (ii) Seller will promptly provide to Purchaser or counsel designated by Purchaser all files related to Prosecuting and Maintaining such Manufacturing Patent; and (iii) Seller will provide to Purchaser a report detailing the status of all Manufacturing Patents that Seller is Prosecuting and Maintaining as of the applicable date of such notice by Seller.
Sample 1
Manufacturing Patents. The Party that is not responsible for the Prosecution and Maintenance of the Manufacturing Patents (the “Non-Prosecuting Party”) agrees to cooperate with the Party that is responsible for the Prosecution and Maintenance of the Manufacturing Patents (the “Prosecuting Party”) with respect to the Prosecuting Party’s efforts to Prosecute and Maintain, and enforce, the Manufacturing Patents, and provide additional information and execute any documents necessary or desirable in connection with the Prosecution and Maintenance, and enforcement, of the Manufacturing Patents. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, with respect to the Manufacturing Patents, the Prosecuting Party shall (i) provide to the Non-Prosecuting Party copies of all correspondence with patent authorities in a jurisdiction; (ii) provide to the Non-Prosecuting Party copies of all material correspondence with patent counsel for such jurisdiction; (iii) provide to the Non-Prosecuting Party copies of, and reasonable time (but in no event less than [**] days, except where such document or submission to such patent authority must be provided in fewer than [**] days under requirements of such patent authority, in which case no less than [**] days) to review and comment upon any documents intended for submission to any patent authority in a jurisdiction, including any patent applications, prior to submission; (iv) furnish to the Non-Prosecuting Party copies of documents related to any filing, prosecution, and maintenance of such Manufacturing Patents; (v) provide the Non-Prosecuting Party copies of each patent application as filed, together with notice of its filing date and serial number; (vi) incorporate in good faith all comments and requests of the Non-Prosecuting Party on documents to be filed with any patent authority in a jurisdiction that would affect such Non-Prosecuting Party’s rights in such Manufacturing Patent hereunder unless the Prosecuting Party reasonably determines in good faith that such comments or requests would adversely affect such Prosecuting Party’s rights hereunder; and (vii) keep the other Party reasonably informed in writing of progress regarding such Manufacturing Patents.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Manufacturing Patents

  • Patent Rights The term “

  • Licensed Patents Immune Design, at its expense, shall have the first right to file, prosecute and maintain all Licensed Patents for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights under this Agreement using patent counsel reasonably approved by IDRI, including conducting any interferences, reexaminations, reissues, oppositions, or request for patent term extension relating thereto. Immune Design shall conduct such filing, prosecution and maintenance in good faith, taking into consideration IDRI’s retained rights hereunder, and consistent with reasonable business judgment, provide IDRI with all relevant or material documentation and proposed filing in the Territory so that IDRI may be concurrently and promptly informed of the continuing prosecution, and consult with IDRI with regards to Immune Design’s patent strategy with the Licensed Patents for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights under this Agreement. Licensed Patents in the name of IDRI shall remain in the name of IDRI. Immune Design shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ***, as applicable. To the extent such ***, Immune Design shall provide IDRI reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such prosecution efforts regarding such Licensed Patents in the Territory, and any IDRI comments will be reasonably considered in such prosecution efforts, and included to the extent affecting the IDRI Exclusive Field or IDRI Territory, as the case may be. If Immune Design determines in its sole discretion to abandon or not maintain any Licensed Patent for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights under this Agreement in the Territory, then Immune Design shall promptly provide IDRI with written notice of such determination at least sixty (60) days before any deadline for taking action to avoid abandonment and shall provide IDRI with the right, opportunity and reasonable assistance to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain such Licensed Patent in the applicable jurisdiction in IDRI’s sole discretion and at IDRI’s expense, provided that Immune Design shall provide such reasonable assistance at its *** INDICATES MATERIAL THAT WAS OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL WAS FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. own costs and expenses. If IDRI elects to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain such Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights, then Immune Design’s license rights to such Licensed Patent in such country will become nonexclusive in such country under such Licensed Patent (and/or patent application). If IDRI desires Immune Design to file, in a particular jurisdiction, a Licensed Patent for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights under this Agreement that claims priority to another Licensed Patent for which Immune Design has any exclusive rights under this Agreement, IDRI shall provide written notice to Immune Design requesting that Immune Design file such patent application in such jurisdiction. If IDRI provides such written notice to Immune Design, Immune Design shall either (i) file and prosecute such patent application and maintain any patent issuing thereon in such jurisdiction and the Parties shall share the related costs and expenses (A) in countries *** on the basis of *** percent (***%) Immune Design: *** percent (***%) IDRI or (B) in countries within the IDRI Territory equally; or (ii) notify IDRI that Immune Design does not desire to file such patent application in such jurisdiction and provide IDRI with the opportunity to file and prosecute such patent application, provided that if IDRI files and prosecutes such patent application in such jurisdiction, then Immune Design’s license rights to such License Patent in such country will become nonexclusive in such country under such Licensed GLA Patent (and/or patent application). Immune Design shall be responsible for the costs and expenses incurred in connection with its own activities for filing, prosecuting and maintaining the Licensed Patents; IDRI shall be responsible for monitoring of such activities by IDRI.

  • Licensed Patent Rights The term “Licensed Patent Rights” shall mean rights arising out of or resulting from:

  • Manufacturing Technology Transfer With respect to each Technology Transfer Product, upon AbbVie’s written request after the Inclusion Date for the Included Target to which such Technology Transfer Product is Directed, Morphic shall effect a full transfer to AbbVie or its designee (which designee may be an Affiliate or a Third Party manufacturer) of all Morphic Know-How and Joint Know-How relating to the then-current process for the Manufacture of such Technology Transfer Product (the “Manufacturing Process”) and to implement the Manufacturing Process at facilities designated by AbbVie (such transfer and implementation, as more fully described in this Section 5.3, the “Manufacturing Technology Transfer”). To assist with the Manufacturing Technology Transfer, Morphic will make its personnel reasonably available to AbbVie during normal business hours for up to [***] FTE hours with respect to each Included Target (in each case, free of charge to AbbVie) to transfer and implement the Manufacturing Process under this Section 5.3. Thereafter, if requested by AbbVie, Morphic shall continue to perform such obligations; provided, that AbbVie will reimburse Morphic for its full-time equivalent (FTE) costs (for clarity, in excess of [***] FTE hours) and any reasonable and verifiable out-of-pocket costs incurred in providing such assistance. CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

  • Joint Patent Rights If not already established under the Research Collaboration Agreement, prior to either Party filing any Patent Right disclosing Joint Program Technology or Joint TAP Platform Improvements, the Parties shall establish a patent committee (the “Patent Committee”) comprised of at least one (1) representative of each Party for the purpose of facilitating the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance and defense of Joint Patent Rights. As agreed upon by the Parties, meetings of the Patent Committee may be face-to-face or may be conducted by teleconferences or videoconferences, from time to time as needed. The Patent Committee will be the forum through which the Parties coordinate their respective obligations to each other described in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 hereof and in this Section. In the event the Parties conceive or generate any Joint Program [***] Certain information contained herein has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. Confidential Treatment Requested by CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. Technology or Joint TAP Platform Improvements, the Parties shall promptly meet to discuss and determine, based on mutual consent, whether to seek patent protection thereon, which Party will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents and how to pay for the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents. It is presumed that CytomX will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Program Technology or Joint Unconjugated Probody Platform Improvements, and that ImmunoGen will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint TAP Platform Improvements or Joint Conjugation Probody Platform Improvements. Neither Party will file any Joint Patent Right without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Party controlling filing and prosecution of any such Joint Patent Right (a) shall keep the other Party informed regarding each Patent Right, (b) shall consider in good faith any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to the filing, prosecution or maintenance of any such Patent Right and (c) shall not unreasonably refuse to incorporate any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to such filing, prosecution or maintenance.

  • Licensed Technology The term "Licensed Technology" shall mean the ------------------- Licensed Patents, plus all improvements thereto developed by Licensor, and all related data, know-how and technology.

  • Joint Patents Neither Party shall have any obligation to file or prosecute any Joint Patent. To the extent a Party wishes to prosecute a Joint Patent, the Parties will mutually agree upon which Party will have the first right to prosecute such Joint Patent, based on the contribution of each Party to such invention and each Party’s potential interest in products based upon such invention. If the Party having such first right does not wish to prosecute such Joint Patent, it shall inform the other Party promptly, but in any event no later than [***] after the Parties have agreed upon which Party had the first right to prosecute such Joint Patent. If the Party having such first right does not wish to prosecute such Joint Patent, the other Party may, upon written notice to such Party, prosecute such Joint Patent. The Party that prosecutes a Joint Patent pursuant to this Section 5.2(b) (the “prosecuting Party”) will solely bear its own internal costs for such prosecution and will solely bear the external costs for such prosecution (e.g., outside counsel, filing fees, etc.). Licensee will have the first right, but not the obligation, to prosecute infringement of any Joint Patents that is related to the Exclusively Licensed Know-How or a product competitive, or potentially competitive, with a Licensed Product; and Licensor will have the first right, but not the obligation, to prosecute infringement of any Joint Patents in all other cases. The Parties shall first confer and mutually agree regarding any such prosecution of infringement; provided, however, that Licensee shall have the right, without the consent of Licensor, to assert a Joint Patent against a Third Party in a defense of or counterclaim to any claim or assertion of infringement of a Patent or misappropriation of Know-How Controlled by such Third Party.

  • Manufacturing License Subject to the terms of this Agreement, including without limitation Section 2.2, Theravance grants to GSK an exclusive license under the Theravance Patents and Theravance Know-How to make and have made API Compound or formulated Alliance Product in the Territory.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

  • Third Party Patent Rights If either Party desires to bring an opposition, action for declaratory judgment, nullity action, interference, declaration for non-infringement, reexamination or other attack upon the validity, title or enforceability of a Patent Right owned or controlled by a Third Party and having one or more claims that Cover the Compound or Product, or the use, sale, offer for sale or importation of the Compound or Product (except insofar as such action is a counterclaim to or defense of, or accompanies a defense of, a Third Party’s claim or assertion of infringement under Section 7.6, in which case the provisions of Section 7.6 shall govern), such Party shall so notify the other Party and the Parties shall promptly confer to determine whether to bring such action or the manner in which to settle such action. Provention shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to bring, at its own expense and in its sole control, such action in the Territory. If Provention does not bring such an action in the Territory, within ninety (90) days of notification thereof pursuant to this Section 7.7(a) (or earlier, if required by the nature of the proceeding), MacroGenics shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring, at MacroGenics’ own expense, such action. The Party not bringing an action under this Section 7.7(a) shall be entitled to separate representation in such proceeding by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, and shall cooperate fully with the Party bringing such action. Any awards or amounts received in bringing any such action shall be first allocated to reimburse the initiating Party’s expenses in such action, and any remaining amounts shall be allocated between the Parties as provided in Section 7.5(e).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.