Investigation Outcome. Any member who has been under investigation and after being informed of the investigation may, not less than twenty-eight (28) days after notification, forward a written inquiry to the responsible Deputy Chief as to the status of the investigation. In response to the member's inquiry, the member shall be advised of the status of the investigation and, if known, the estimated time necessary to complete the investigation. The investigation of citizen complaints shall be concluded within ninety (90) days after the date the complaint was received by the City. This deadline may be extended by the Lodge upon written request from the City. Such request will set forth rationale for the City’s inability to meet the ninety (90) day deadline and include an estimated time of completion. An agreement to extend an investigation beyond the ninety (90) days will not be unreasonably withheld by the Lodge. An investigation will be considered concluded on the date it is initially forwarded to the chain of command for review. If the applicable time limit is not met, or the investigation otherwise exceeds one-hundred eighty (180) days, no member will be disciplined arising out of the investigation of such citizen complaint. The ninety (90) day limit shall be held in abeyance pending determination by the chain of command to investigate criminal activity and during any on-going criminal investigation. Further, the ninety (90) day limit shall not apply to any chain of command review. At the conclusion of any investigation, the member shall be informed in writing of the outcome.
Investigation Outcome. (A) Any member who has been under investigation and has been interviewed may, not less than twenty-eight (28) days after the interview, forward a written inquiry to the responsible Deputy Chief as to the status of the investigation. In response to the member's inquiry, the member shall be advised of the status of the investigation and, if known, the estimated time necessary to complete the investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, the member shall be informed in writing of the outcome of the case. All investigations shall be completed within fifty-six (56) days from when the department first became aware of the incident causing the investigation.
Investigation Outcome. Any member who has been under investigation and after being informed of the investigation may, not less than twenty-eight (28) days after notification, forward a written inquiry to the responsible Deputy Chief as to the status of the investigation. In response to the member's inquiry, the member shall be advised of the status of the investigation and, if known, the estimated time necessary to complete the investigation. The investigation of citizen complaints shall be concluded within ninety (90) days after the date the complaint was received by the City. This deadline may be extended by the Lodge upon written request from the City. Such request will set forth rationale for the City’s inability to meet the ninety (90) day deadline and include an estimated time of completion. An agreement to extend an investigation beyond the ninety (90) days will not be unreasonably withheld by the Lodge. An investigation will be considered concluded on the date it is initially forwarded to the chain of command for review. An arbitrator shall consider the result of the applicable time limit not being met, or if the investigation otherwise exceeds one-hundred eighty (180) days, as part of his/her analysis related to any discipline arising out of the investigation of such citizen complaint. The ninety (90) day limit shall be held in abeyance pending determination by the chain of command to investigate criminal activity and during any on-going criminal investigation. Further, the ninety (90) day limit shall not apply to any chain of command review. At the conclusion of any investigation, the member shall be informed in writing of the outcome.
Investigation Outcome. At the conclusion of an investigation into a complaint by and/or against a member of the USW bargaining unit, any Complainant and any Respondent who are members of the USW bargaining unit will be advised of the following: what allegations were investigated; what allegations (if any) were not investigated and the reason(s) why; names of witnesses interviewed during the investigation (unless there are specific reasons not to name one or more witnesses in a particular case); a summary of the evidence on each allegation; the investigator’s finding on each allegation; and the basis of the finding and steps to prevent reoccurrence, in compliance with applicable legislation and University policy. In non-USW/USW investigations, one representative of the Union will be given an opportunity to meet with the investigator at the conclusion of the investigation in order to discuss the outcome of the investigation. The University reserves the right to have a management representative present at this meeting. The parties will endeavour to meet before the outcome is provided to the Complainant and Respondent; however, the University reserves the right to convey the outcome to the Complainant and the Respondent before meeting with the Union. The Union shall be provided with an advance copy of any letters provided to USW members informing them of the outcome of the investigation. The University in all cases reserves the sole right to determine what measures will be put in place following an investigation, including but not limited to the appropriate penalty for any misconduct that is found during an investigation.
Investigation Outcome. At the conclusion of an investigation into a complaint by and/or against a member of the USW bargaining unit, any Complainant and any Respondent who are members of the USW bargaining unit will be advised of the following: what allegations were investigated; what allegations (if any) were not investigated and the reason(s) why; names of witnesses interviewed during the investigation (unless there are specific reasons not to name one or more witnesses in a particular case); a summary of the evidence on each allegation; the investigator’s finding on each allegation; and the basis of the finding. In non-USW/USW investigations, one representative of the Union will be given an opportunity to meet with the investigator at the conclusion of the investigation in order to discuss the outcome of the investigation. The University reserves the right to have a management representative present at this meeting. The parties will endeavour to meet before the outcome is provided to the Complainant and Respondent; however, the University reserves the right to convey the outcome to the Complainant and the Respondent before meeting with the Union. The University in all cases reserves the sole right to determine what measures will be put in place following an investigation, including but not limited to the appropriate penalty for any misconduct that is found during an investigation.
Investigation Outcome. Any member who has been under investigation and after being informed of the investigation may, not less than twenty-eight (28) days after notification, forward a written inquiry to the responsible Deputy Chief as to the status of the investigation. In response to the member’s inquiry, the member shall be advised of the status of the investigation and, if known, the estimated time necessary to complete the investigation. The investigation of citizen complaints shall be concluded within ninety (90) days after the date the complaint was received by the City. This deadline may be extended by the Lodge upon written request from the City. Such request will set forth rationale for the City’s inability to meet the ninety (90) day deadline and include an estimated time of completion. An agreement to extend an investigation beyond the ninety (90) days will not be unreasonably withheld by the Lodge. An investigation will be considered concluded on the date it is initially forwarded to the chain of command for review. An arbitrator shall consider the result of the applicable time limit not being met, or if the investigation otherwise exceeds one-hundred eighty (180) days, as part of his/her analysis related to any discipline arising out of the investigation of such citizen complaint. The ninety (90) day limit shall be held in abeyance pending determination by the chain of command to investigate criminal activity and during any on-going criminal investigation. Further, the ninety (90) day limit shall not apply to any chain of command review. At the conclusion of any investigation, the member shall be informed in writing of the outcome. [Note: This is a potentially problematic provision if 90 days is not a reasonable period in which to complete an investigation, and the Union is not granting requested extensions. This will depend on input from people on the ground in Columbus.] 40 ACLU of Ohio
Investigation Outcome. Any member who has been under investigation and has been interviewed may, not less than twenty-eight (28) days after the interview, forward a written inquiry to the responsible Deputy Chief as to the status of the investigation. In response to the member's inquiry, the member shall be advised of the status of the investigation and, if known, the estimated time necessary to complete the investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation, the member shall be informed in writing of the outcome of the case.
Investigation Outcome. 6.71 The nominated officer is responsible for deciding if there is a case to answer at a disciplinary hearing after receiving the investigating officer’s report.
Investigation Outcome a. The Investigative Team will come to one of the following outcomes at the completion of their investigation, based on a balance of probabilities and civil standard:
