Fish and Wildlife. Coordination Act (FWCA) (This scope is for the corresponding section(s) as listed in the Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences section of the EA.) The Engineer shall identify water body modifications and impacts to wildlife. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) applies to projects that would result in the control or modification of a natural stream or body of water and would require a Section 404 Individual Permit.
Fish and Wildlife. 6.2.2 A Yukon Indian Person has and a Yukon First Nation has a right of access without the consent of Government to cross and make necessary stops on Crown Land to reach adjacent Settlement Land for commercial purposes if:
Fish and Wildlife. Except as provided in section 539m–6(b)(2)(B) of this title, nothing in sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title shall be construed as affecting the responsibilities of the State of New Mexico with respect to fish and wildlife, including the regula- tion of hunting, fishing, or trapping within the Area. (Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title IV, § 411, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 291.)
Fish and Wildlife. Except as provided in section 539m–6(b)(2)(B) of this title, nothing in sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title shall be construed as affecting the responsibilities of the State of New Mexico with respect to fish and wildlife, including the regula- tion of hunting, fishing, or trapping within the Area. (Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title IV, § 411, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 291.) 1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘subsections’’. References in Text Sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original ‘‘this title’’, meaning title IV of div. F of Pub. L. 108–7, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 279, which is classified generally to sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 539m of this title and Tables. Codification Section is comprised of section 411 of div. F of Pub.
Fish and Wildlife. Coordination Act, 16 U.S.C. 661-667(e) Proposed FY 2011 Budget Request: $189,000
Fish and Wildlife. (a) Grants of Federal funds.
Fish and Wildlife. Service efforts via the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission in reducing sea lamprey abundance to levels agreed upon by the Commission, and
Fish and Wildlife. An Access Permit from LA County Flood Control District may be needed for flood control easement. The permits will need annual renewal to ensure compliance. This task includes obtaining additional permits as needed. This task includes the Santa Xxxxx River Conservancy (SCRC), City of Santa Clarita and VCRCD working and collaborating with newly assigned staff on the history and breadth of the regional permits.
Fish and Wildlife. There will be short-term impacts from the construction of the levee repairs. The primary impact will be a temporary increase in turbidity due to fill placement. However, this impact will be minimized by using clean fill material. Because the work will be accomplished during the established work window (July 1 — August 31), the potential disruption to salmonids in the area will be minimized. Adult sockeye salmon and Chinook may be entering the river in late August in preparation for upstream migration to spawning areas. If present, adult and juvenile salmonids may be temporarily displaced from this area during the construction activity. However, this portion of the river is mainly used N PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT REHABILITATION OF FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Cedar River at Renton CED -1 -07 as a transportation corridor for anadromous fish; very limited sockeye spawning occurs in this reach of the river, and fish are not expected to linger in the area. The terrestrial environment is highly urbanized and provides limited wildlife habitat. Riparian vegetation in this reach is limited to a few overhanging willows and invasive species such as knotweed, xxxx canary grass, Scot's broom, and Himalayan blackberry. However, there are two known bald eagle nests located within one mile of the project. It is unlikely that construction activities will have any impact on eagle activity as the area is heavily urbanized. Noise, activity, and exhaust levels are generally high and wildlife that utilize the area (including eagles) are acclimated to these conditions. While it is possible that the presence and use of heavy construction equipment may temporarily displace some species at both the borrow pit and construction sites, adverse impacts to wildlife are expected to be minor. c.
Fish and Wildlife. Service organization, a participating agreement for prescribed burning assistance was not signed and so this agreement was committed but could not be obligated. This was a $100,000 agreement, so the Ouachita had $1,279,160 committed out of $1,304,639, or 98% of the total allocated. This amount should match the amount of CFLR/CFLN dollars obligated in the PAS expenditure report. Include prior year CFLN dollars expended in this Fiscal Year. Fund Source – (Funds expended from Washington Office funds (in addition to CFLR/CFLN) (please include a new row for each BLI)) Total Funds Expended in Fiscal Year 2017 NFTM17* $135,972 WFHF17 $606,193 * Due to late-in-the-FY approval of same-year CF job code to isolate these two allocations from same-year matching funds (CF9M1817 for NFTM; CF9F1817 for WFHF), $265,284 in NFTM was not able to be adjusted into these codes and was not picked up in gPAS. Total spending of the direct allocations for our CFLRP project was $401,256 in NFTM17 and $606,193 in WFHF17. This value (aka carryover funds or WO unobligated funds) should reflect the amount expended of the allocated funds as indicated in the program direction, but does not necessarily need to be in the same BLIs or budget fiscal year as indicated in the program direction. Fund Source – (FS Matching Funds (please include a new row for each BLI) Total Funds Expended in Fiscal Year 2017 CMRD $256,897 CWKV $418,446 NFTM $336,194 NFVW $76,920 NFWF $66,907 WFHF $526,296 This amount should match the amount of matching funds obligated in the gPAS expenditure report, minus the Washington Office funds listed in the box above and any partner funds contributed through agreements (such as NFEX, SPEX, WFEX, CMEX, and CWFS) listed in the box below. Fund Source – (Funds contributed through agreements) Total Funds Expended in Fiscal Year 2017 NA NA Please document any partner contributions to implementation and monitoring of the CFLR project through an income funds agreement (this should include partner funds captured through the gPAS job reports such as NFEX, SPEX, WFEX, CMEX, and CWFS). Please list the partner organizations involved in the agreement. Partner contributions for Fish, Wildlife, Watershed work can be found in WIT database. Fund Source – (Partner In-Kind Contributions) Total Funds Expended in Fiscal Year 2017 Arkansas State University (Wild Turkey monitoring analysis) $19,348 National Wild Turkey Federation (Wild Turkey monitoring $824 Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (Turke...
