FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. [(1) As in the Agreement with the following changes:
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. There will be a zero based pooled fund for this schedule. The CCG will be charged on a cost per case basis on a quarterly basis in arrears following completion of the activity. Audit Arrangements The Public Health department within the local authority will provide: Quarterly performance report detailing the number of IUS fits, reviews and removals by individual provider, the split of the cost (i.e. 100% or 50% CCG depending if also for contraception) Quarterly invoice for the activity in the previous quarter Annual LARC audit summary report for CBS service providers detailing the number of LARC fitters, their qualifications, complication rates and action taken. (Dependent on timely submission of completed audits from CBS providers) These reports will be reported via the quarterly Integrated Finance and Performance meetings which are part of the Integration Executive’s governance arrangements.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. If during the course of monthly monitoring of activity and expenditure, a risk of overspend is identified in any of the Schemes, the Pooled Fund Manager will require a Remedial Action Plan to be produced by the provider and this will be presented to the Integrated Care Partnership within 21 days. Integrated Care Partnership, where appropriate in consultation with the Health and Well-being Board will then consider whether it needs to agree the action plan in order to reduce expenditure.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. The finance arrangements of the Host Partner apply. Where there are any issues of concern there is discussion and agreement between finance managers from both Partners. Any projected overspends and use of any under spends needs to be discussed between the Partners and agreed at the JSCG.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. (1) [(1) As in the Agreement with the following changes) Management of the Pooled Fund Are any amendments required to the Agreement in relation to the management of Pooled Fund Has the budget been agreed? How will changes to the budget level be implemented? Have eligibility criteria been established? What are the rules about access to the pooled budget? Does the scheme's budget manager require training? Have the scheme managers' delegated powers been determined?
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. Management of the Pooled Fund A lead finance manager, appointed on behalf of the lead commissioning organisation, as the Pooled Fund Manager will oversee the implementation of spends for each scheme or core funding allocation, in accordance with the approved Business Cases or core funding agreements. Allocations to social care services are protected under the National Conditions, the Finance Manager will be the ASC nominated Pooled Fund Manager. Both Partners Finance teams will monitor spend and produce regular reports for the JSCG and FSG. In addition, performance indicators are established to monitor delivery of the Enhanced Health in Care Homes change scheme and the Luton Falls Pathway to measure the expected benefits. An annual report against the core funding will evidence the qualitative and quantitative impact of the investment into allocated services. The JSCG and FSG will both monitor spend and performance. The JSCG will recommend the jointly agreed allocations to the Health and Wellbeing Board for full approval. Allocation of any under spends are to be discussed and agreed between the Partners at the JSCG and the FSG, with unresolved issues escalated to the Health and Wellbeing Board.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. The Pooled Fund is managed by the Council. The contributions to the Pooled Fund for this schedule will be adjusted annually, usually at the start of the financial year, in line with changes to salary costs of the Joint Commissioning Team. A quarterly financial reconciliation will be carried out between the two finance departments of the Partners, to determine whether any recharges are needed between the Partners based on the agreed split of team costs. If any decisions arise related to potential redundancies, or other such events, the JCB will need to determine the agreed outcome. This should consider any financial implications such as redundancy payments and pension liabilities. Any non-salary costs such as recruitment, travel expenses, training, attendance at conferences etc. should be split between the Partners, based on the split in costs in the agreed structure. Spend should be within the agreed structure. Any variations to the agreed spend plan should be known in advance and will need to be agreed through a report to the Joint Commissioning Board.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. The total value of the Better Care Fund in Thurrock is £18,019,000 and the amount of the Better Care Fund described as ‘at risk’ is the performance element of £722,000. If during the course of monthly monitoring of activity and expenditure, a risk of overspend is identified in any of the Schemes, the Pooled Fund Manager will require a Remedial Action Plan to be produced by the provider and this will be presented to the Integrated Commissioning Executive within 21 days. The Integrated Commissioning Executive, where appropriate in consultation with the Health and Well-being Board will then consider whether it needs to agree the action plan in order to reduce expenditure.
FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. Management of the Pooled Fund A lead finance manager, appointed on behalf of the lead commissioning organisation, as the Pooled Fund Manager will oversee the implementation of spends for each scheme or enabler project, in accordance with the approved Business Cases. Allocations to social care services are protected under the National Conditions, the Finance Manager will be the ASC nominated Pooled Fund Manager. Both Partners Finance teams will monitor spend and produce regular reports for the JSCG and FSG. In addition, performance indicators are established to monitor delivery of the Enhanced Health in Care Homes change scheme and measure the expected benefits. A quarterly report against the core funding will evidence the qualitative and quantitative impact of the investment into allocated services. The JSCG and FSG will both monitor spend and performance. The JSCG will recommend the jointly agreed allocations to the Health and Wellbeing Board for full approval. Allocation of any under spends are to be discussed and agreed between the Partners at the JSCG and the FSG, with unresolved issues escalated to the Health and Wellbeing Board.
