Evaluation of Proposals and Bidders Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Proposals and Bidders. The evaluation of bidders and proposals will be done in accordance with the following subsequent steps: • Verification that the bidder fulfils the Exclusion Criteria in Section 5.1 and that it is not in one of the situations covered by the exclusion criteria listed in EU Directive 2014/24/EU. • Verification that the bidder has the appropriate capacities to perform the contract based on the Selection Criteria described in Section 5.2 (only for those bidders that were not excluded based on the Exclusion Criteria). • Evaluation of the bidder based on the Award Criteria described in Section 5.3 (only for those bidders that have met the Selection Criteria). • Where individual scoring is adopted, the Evaluation Committee shall discuss scores were there are significant discrepancies prior to computing the average score for each criterion. • At the Mini-competition stage, during financial evaluation, where there is a discrepancy between the amounts in figures and in words, the amount in words shall govern. Where there is a discrepancy between the unit rate and the line-item total resulting from multiplying the unit rate by the quantity, the unit rate shall govern, unless in the opinion of the Evaluation Committee there is an obviously gross misplacement of the decimal point in the unit rate, in which case the line-item total shall govern, and the unit rate shall be corrected. The proposal must comply with the GCA strategic requirements set in this RFP as a precondition to be assessed. In a case of non-compliance with the Eligibility criteria, the Bidder will be informed of the grounds for rejection without being given feedback on the content of the proposal other than on the non-compliant elements. The evaluation of proposals shall be carried out by an Evaluation Committee made up of representatives of GCA. Any attempt by a bidder to influence the evaluation committee in the process of examination, clarification, evaluation, due diligence checks, etc., to obtain information on how the procedure is progressing or to influence GCA in its decision concerning the award of the contract, will result in the immediate rejection of the bidder’s proposal. In the interests of transparency and equal treatment and without being able to modify their proposals, bidders may be required, at the sole written request of the evaluation committee, to provide clarifications within 48 hours. Requests for clarifications will only seek minor clarifications of information already submitted...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Proposals and Bidders. 10 5.1 Exclusion Criteria 11 5.2 Selection Criteria 11 5.3 Award Criteria 12 5.4 Content of the Technical Proposal 14 6. Additional Provisions 14 Annexes 15 Annex 1: Proposal Submission/Identification Form 16 Annex 2: Declaration on Honor Annex 3: Scope of Work/Terms of Reference (TORs) 21 Annex 4: Framework Agreement
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Proposals and Bidders

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx-Green, via e- mail at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxXXX.xxx no later than 5:00 p.m. Central, Wednesday, March 10, 2021.

  • Rejection of Proposals The County reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to accept the proposal or any part thereof which it determines to best serve the needs of the County and to waive any informalities or irregularities in the proposals. While cost is a factor in any contract award, it is not the only factor and may not be the determining factor.

  • Clarification of Proposals Evaluations will be in accordance with the selection criteria set forth in the proposal request. Upon completion of evaluations, the CO will issue a task order to the contractor whose proposal provides the best value to the Government.

  • Consideration of proposals 6. (1) In respect of each proposal pursuant to subclause (1) of Clause 5 the Minister shall —

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Order of proposals (2) Each of the proposals pursuant to subclause (1) may, with the approval of the Minister or if so required by him, be submitted separately and in any order as to the matter or matters mentioned in one or more of paragraphs (a) to (k) of subclause (1).

  • EVALUATION OF BIDS i) Bids submitted by the tenderer will be opened first and evaluated for fulfilling the Pre-qualification criteria and other conditions in NIT/Tender documents, based on documentary evidence submitted along with the offer.

  • Effect of non-approval of proposals (6) Notwithstanding that under subclause (1) any proposals of the Company are approved by the Minister or determined by arbitration award, unless each and every such proposal and matter is so approved or determined by 31 October 1992 or by such extended date or period if any as the Company shall be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement then the Minister may give to the Company 12 months notice of intention to determine this Agreement and unless before the expiration of the said 12 months period all the detailed proposals and matters are so approved or determined this Agreement shall cease and determine subject however to the provisions of Clause 35. Implementation of proposals

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.